linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:52:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200421025254.GK1868936@builder.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200417002036.24359-2-s-anna@ti.com>

On Thu 16 Apr 17:20 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:

> From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
> 
> On some SoC architecture, it is needed to enable HW like
> clock, bus, regulator, memory region... before loading
> co-processor firmware.
> 
> This patch introduces prepare and unprepare ops to execute
> platform specific function before firmware loading and after
> stop execution.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

Do we have an inbound user of these new oops?

Regards,
Bjorn

> ---
> v1:
>  - Make the direct ops into inline helper functions in line
>    with the comments on the MCU sync series (v1 comments).
>    No change in functionality.
>  - Picked up the Reviewed-by tags
> v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456383/
> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h               |  4 ++++
>  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index d681eeb962b6..e38f627059ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1394,12 +1394,19 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Prepare rproc for firmware loading if needed */
> +	ret = rproc_prepare_device(rproc);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "can't prepare rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
> +		goto disable_iommu;
> +	}
> +
>  	rproc->bootaddr = rproc_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
>  
>  	/* Load resource table, core dump segment list etc from the firmware */
>  	ret = rproc_parse_fw(rproc, fw);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto disable_iommu;
> +		goto unprepare_rproc;
>  
>  	/* reset max_notifyid */
>  	rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
> @@ -1433,6 +1440,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
>  	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
>  	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
> +unprepare_rproc:
> +	/* release HW resources if needed */
> +	rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
>  disable_iommu:
>  	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -1838,6 +1848,9 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	/* clean up all acquired resources */
>  	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
>  
> +	/* release HW resources if needed */
> +	rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
> +
>  	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
>  
>  	/* Free the copy of the resource table */
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> index b389dc79da81..101e6be8d240 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,22 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
>  struct rproc_mem_entry *
>  rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc, const char *name, ...);
>  
> +static inline int rproc_prepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	if (rproc->ops->prepare)
> +		return rproc->ops->prepare(rproc);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rproc_unprepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	if (rproc->ops->unprepare)
> +		return rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static inline
>  int rproc_fw_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index 38607107b7cb..b8481ac969f1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
>  
>  /**
>   * struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers
> + * @prepare:	prepare device for code loading
> + * @unprepare:	unprepare device after stop
>   * @start:	power on the device and boot it
>   * @stop:	power off the device
>   * @kick:	kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
> @@ -373,6 +375,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
>   *		panic at least the returned number of milliseconds
>   */
>  struct rproc_ops {
> +	int (*prepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
> +	int (*unprepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
>  	int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
>  	int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
>  	void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
> -- 
> 2.26.0
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-21  2:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-17  0:20 [PATCH 0/2] rproc core patches needed for TI K3 drivers Suman Anna
2020-04-17  0:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops Suman Anna
2020-04-21  2:52   ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2020-04-21 14:12     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-23  5:01       ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-17  0:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field Suman Anna
2020-04-17 17:04   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-20  4:59   ` Bjorn Andersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200421025254.GK1868936@builder.lan \
    --to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=s-anna@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).