linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCHv3 04/50] arm/asm: Add loglvl to c_backtrace()
       [not found] <20200418201944.482088-1-dima@arista.com>
@ 2020-04-18 20:18 ` Dmitry Safonov
  2020-04-18 20:18 ` [PATCHv3 05/50] arm: Add loglvl to unwind_backtrace() Dmitry Safonov
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Safonov @ 2020-04-18 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Petr Mladek, Dmitry Safonov, Tetsuo Handa, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
	Dmitry Safonov, Russell King, Steven Rostedt, Sergey Senozhatsky,
	clang-built-linux, Jiri Slaby, Andrew Morton, Will Deacon,
	Ingo Molnar, linux-arm-kernel

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.

Add log level argument to c_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing
show_stack_loglvl().

Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h     |  3 ++-
 arch/arm/include/asm/traps.h   |  3 ++-
 arch/arm/kernel/traps.c        |  9 +++++----
 arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c       |  2 +-
 arch/arm/lib/backtrace-clang.S |  9 +++++++--
 arch/arm/lib/backtrace.S       | 14 ++++++++++----
 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h
index deef4d0cb3b5..673c7dd75ab9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h
@@ -82,7 +82,8 @@ void hook_ifault_code(int nr, int (*fn)(unsigned long, unsigned int,
 				       struct pt_regs *),
 		     int sig, int code, const char *name);
 
-extern asmlinkage void c_backtrace(unsigned long fp, int pmode);
+extern asmlinkage void c_backtrace(unsigned long fp, int pmode,
+				   const char *loglvl);
 
 struct mm_struct;
 void show_pte(const char *lvl, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr);
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/traps.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/traps.h
index 172b08ff3760..987fefb0a4db 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/traps.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/traps.h
@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ static inline int __in_irqentry_text(unsigned long ptr)
 }
 
 extern void __init early_trap_init(void *);
-extern void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, unsigned long from, unsigned long frame);
+extern void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, unsigned long from,
+				 unsigned long frame, const char *loglvl);
 extern void ptrace_break(struct pt_regs *regs);
 
 extern void *vectors_page;
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
index 1e70e7227f0f..2030611f22b8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ __setup("user_debug=", user_debug_setup);
 
 static void dump_mem(const char *, const char *, unsigned long, unsigned long);
 
-void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, unsigned long from, unsigned long frame)
+void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, unsigned long from,
+			  unsigned long frame, const char *loglvl)
 {
 	unsigned long end = frame + 4 + sizeof(struct pt_regs);
 
@@ -76,7 +77,7 @@ void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, unsigned long from, unsigned long
 		dump_mem("", "Exception stack", frame + 4, end);
 }
 
-void dump_backtrace_stm(u32 *stack, u32 instruction)
+void dump_backtrace_stm(u32 *stack, u32 instruction, const char *loglvl)
 {
 	char str[80], *p;
 	unsigned int x;
@@ -238,7 +239,7 @@ static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 	pr_cont("\n");
 
 	if (ok)
-		c_backtrace(fp, mode);
+		c_backtrace(fp, mode, NULL);
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -666,7 +667,7 @@ asmlinkage int arm_syscall(int no, struct pt_regs *regs)
 		dump_instr("", regs);
 		if (user_mode(regs)) {
 			__show_regs(regs);
-			c_backtrace(frame_pointer(regs), processor_mode(regs));
+			c_backtrace(frame_pointer(regs), processor_mode(regs), NULL);
 		}
 	}
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
index 11a964fd66f4..343cc27b36c4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 		urc = unwind_frame(&frame);
 		if (urc < 0)
 			break;
-		dump_backtrace_entry(where, frame.pc, frame.sp - 4);
+		dump_backtrace_entry(where, frame.pc, frame.sp - 4, NULL);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/backtrace-clang.S b/arch/arm/lib/backtrace-clang.S
index 2ff375144b55..6174c45f53a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/lib/backtrace-clang.S
+++ b/arch/arm/lib/backtrace-clang.S
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #define sv_pc	r6
 #define mask	r7
 #define sv_lr	r8
+#define loglvl	r9
 
 ENTRY(c_backtrace)
 
@@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
 						@ to ensure 8 byte alignment
 		movs	frame, r0		@ if frame pointer is zero
 		beq	no_frame		@ we have no stack frames
+		mov	loglvl, r2
 		tst	r1, #0x10		@ 26 or 32-bit mode?
 		moveq	mask, #0xfc000003
 		movne	mask, #0		@ mask for 32-bit
@@ -167,6 +169,7 @@ finished_setup:
 		mov	r1, sv_lr
 		mov	r2, frame
 		bic	r1, r1, mask		@ mask PC/LR for the mode
+		mov	r3, loglvl
 		bl	dump_backtrace_entry
 
 /*
@@ -183,6 +186,7 @@ finished_setup:
 		ldr	r0, [frame]		@ locals are stored in
 						@ the preceding frame
 		subeq	r0, r0, #4
+		mov	r2, loglvl
 		bleq	dump_backtrace_stm	@ dump saved registers
 
 /*
@@ -196,7 +200,8 @@ finished_setup:
 		bhi	for_each_frame
 
 1006:		adr	r0, .Lbad
-		mov	r1, frame
+		mov	r1, loglvl
+		mov	r2, frame
 		bl	printk
 no_frame:	ldmfd	sp!, {r4 - r9, fp, pc}
 ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
@@ -209,7 +214,7 @@ ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
 		.long   1005b, 1006b
 		.popsection
 
-.Lbad:		.asciz	"Backtrace aborted due to bad frame pointer <%p>\n"
+.Lbad:		.asciz	"%sBacktrace aborted due to bad frame pointer <%p>\n"
 		.align
 .Lopcode:	.word	0xe92d4800 >> 11	@ stmfd sp!, {... fp, lr}
 		.word	0x0b000000		@ bl if these bits are set
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/backtrace.S b/arch/arm/lib/backtrace.S
index 582925238d65..872f658638d9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/lib/backtrace.S
+++ b/arch/arm/lib/backtrace.S
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 #define sv_pc	r6
 #define mask	r7
 #define offset	r8
+#define loglvl	r9
 
 ENTRY(c_backtrace)
 
@@ -25,9 +26,10 @@ ENTRY(c_backtrace)
 		ret	lr
 ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
 #else
-		stmfd	sp!, {r4 - r8, lr}	@ Save an extra register so we have a location...
+		stmfd	sp!, {r4 - r9, lr}	@ Save an extra register so we have a location...
 		movs	frame, r0		@ if frame pointer is zero
 		beq	no_frame		@ we have no stack frames
+		mov	loglvl, r2
 
 		tst	r1, #0x10		@ 26 or 32-bit mode?
  ARM(		moveq	mask, #0xfc000003	)
@@ -73,6 +75,7 @@ for_each_frame:	tst	frame, mask		@ Check for address exceptions
 		ldr	r1, [frame, #-4]	@ get saved lr
 		mov	r2, frame
 		bic	r1, r1, mask		@ mask PC/LR for the mode
+		mov	r3, loglvl
 		bl	dump_backtrace_entry
 
 		ldr	r1, [sv_pc, #-4]	@ if stmfd sp!, {args} exists,
@@ -80,12 +83,14 @@ for_each_frame:	tst	frame, mask		@ Check for address exceptions
 		teq	r3, r1, lsr #11
 		ldreq	r0, [frame, #-8]	@ get sp
 		subeq	r0, r0, #4		@ point at the last arg
+		mov	r2, loglvl
 		bleq	dump_backtrace_stm	@ dump saved registers
 
 1004:		ldr	r1, [sv_pc, #0]		@ if stmfd sp!, {..., fp, ip, lr, pc}
 		ldr	r3, .Ldsi		@ instruction exists,
 		teq	r3, r1, lsr #11
 		subeq	r0, frame, #16
+		mov	r2, loglvl
 		bleq	dump_backtrace_stm	@ dump saved registers
 
 		teq	sv_fp, #0		@ zero saved fp means
@@ -96,9 +101,10 @@ for_each_frame:	tst	frame, mask		@ Check for address exceptions
 		bhi	for_each_frame
 
 1006:		adr	r0, .Lbad
-		mov	r1, frame
+		mov	r1, loglvl
+		mov	r2, frame
 		bl	printk
-no_frame:	ldmfd	sp!, {r4 - r8, pc}
+no_frame:	ldmfd	sp!, {r4 - r9, pc}
 ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
 		
 		.pushsection __ex_table,"a"
@@ -109,7 +115,7 @@ ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
 		.long	1004b, 1006b
 		.popsection
 
-.Lbad:		.asciz	"Backtrace aborted due to bad frame pointer <%p>\n"
+.Lbad:		.asciz	"%sBacktrace aborted due to bad frame pointer <%p>\n"
 		.align
 .Ldsi:		.word	0xe92dd800 >> 11	@ stmfd sp!, {... fp, ip, lr, pc}
 		.word	0xe92d0000 >> 11	@ stmfd sp!, {}
-- 
2.26.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCHv3 05/50] arm: Add loglvl to unwind_backtrace()
       [not found] <20200418201944.482088-1-dima@arista.com>
  2020-04-18 20:18 ` [PATCHv3 04/50] arm/asm: Add loglvl to c_backtrace() Dmitry Safonov
@ 2020-04-18 20:18 ` Dmitry Safonov
  2020-04-18 20:19 ` [PATCHv3 06/50] arm: Add loglvl to dump_backtrace() Dmitry Safonov
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Safonov @ 2020-04-18 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Petr Mladek, Dmitry Safonov, Tetsuo Handa, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
	Dmitry Safonov, Russell King, Steven Rostedt, Sergey Senozhatsky,
	clang-built-linux, Jiri Slaby, Andrew Morton, Will Deacon,
	Ingo Molnar, linux-arm-kernel

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.

Add log level argument to unwind_backtrace() as a preparation for
introducing show_stack_loglvl().

As a good side-effect arm_syscall() is now printing errors with the same
log level as the backtrace.

Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/unwind.h | 3 ++-
 arch/arm/kernel/traps.c       | 6 +++---
 arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c      | 5 +++--
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/unwind.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/unwind.h
index 6e282c33126b..0f8a3439902d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/unwind.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/unwind.h
@@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ extern struct unwind_table *unwind_table_add(unsigned long start,
 					     unsigned long text_addr,
 					     unsigned long text_size);
 extern void unwind_table_del(struct unwind_table *tab);
-extern void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk);
+extern void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
+			     const char *loglvl);
 
 #endif	/* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
index 2030611f22b8..685e17c2e275 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND
 static inline void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
-	unwind_backtrace(regs, tsk);
+	unwind_backtrace(regs, tsk, KERN_DEFAULT);
 }
 #else
 static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
@@ -664,10 +664,10 @@ asmlinkage int arm_syscall(int no, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (user_debug & UDBG_SYSCALL) {
 		pr_err("[%d] %s: arm syscall %d\n",
 		       task_pid_nr(current), current->comm, no);
-		dump_instr("", regs);
+		dump_instr(KERN_ERR, regs);
 		if (user_mode(regs)) {
 			__show_regs(regs);
-			c_backtrace(frame_pointer(regs), processor_mode(regs), NULL);
+			c_backtrace(frame_pointer(regs), processor_mode(regs), KERN_ERR);
 		}
 	}
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
index 343cc27b36c4..d2bd0df2318d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
@@ -455,7 +455,8 @@ int unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame)
 	return URC_OK;
 }
 
-void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
+void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
+		      const char *loglvl)
 {
 	struct stackframe frame;
 
@@ -493,7 +494,7 @@ void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 		urc = unwind_frame(&frame);
 		if (urc < 0)
 			break;
-		dump_backtrace_entry(where, frame.pc, frame.sp - 4, NULL);
+		dump_backtrace_entry(where, frame.pc, frame.sp - 4, loglvl);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.26.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCHv3 06/50] arm: Add loglvl to dump_backtrace()
       [not found] <20200418201944.482088-1-dima@arista.com>
  2020-04-18 20:18 ` [PATCHv3 04/50] arm/asm: Add loglvl to c_backtrace() Dmitry Safonov
  2020-04-18 20:18 ` [PATCHv3 05/50] arm: Add loglvl to unwind_backtrace() Dmitry Safonov
@ 2020-04-18 20:19 ` Dmitry Safonov
  2020-04-18 20:19 ` [PATCHv3 07/50] arm: Wire up dump_backtrace_{entry,stm} Dmitry Safonov
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Safonov @ 2020-04-18 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Petr Mladek, Dmitry Safonov, Tetsuo Handa, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
	Dmitry Safonov, Russell King, Steven Rostedt, Sergey Senozhatsky,
	clang-built-linux, Jiri Slaby, Andrew Morton, Will Deacon,
	Ingo Molnar, linux-arm-kernel

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.

Add log level argument to dump_backtrace() as a preparation for
introducing show_stack_loglvl().

As a good side-effect __die() now prints not only "Stack:" header with
KERN_EMERG, but the backtrace itself.

Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
index 685e17c2e275..0f09ace18e6c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
@@ -202,17 +202,19 @@ static void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND
-static inline void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
+static inline void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
+				  const char *loglvl)
 {
-	unwind_backtrace(regs, tsk, KERN_DEFAULT);
+	unwind_backtrace(regs, tsk, loglvl);
 }
 #else
-static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
+static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
+			   const char *loglvl)
 {
 	unsigned int fp, mode;
 	int ok = 1;
 
-	printk("Backtrace: ");
+	printk("%sBacktrace: ", loglvl);
 
 	if (!tsk)
 		tsk = current;
@@ -239,13 +241,13 @@ static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 	pr_cont("\n");
 
 	if (ok)
-		c_backtrace(fp, mode, NULL);
+		c_backtrace(fp, mode, loglvl);
 }
 #endif
 
 void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp)
 {
-	dump_backtrace(NULL, tsk);
+	dump_backtrace(NULL, tsk, KERN_DEFAULT);
 	barrier();
 }
 
@@ -289,7 +291,7 @@ static int __die(const char *str, int err, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (!user_mode(regs) || in_interrupt()) {
 		dump_mem(KERN_EMERG, "Stack: ", regs->ARM_sp,
 			 THREAD_SIZE + (unsigned long)task_stack_page(tsk));
-		dump_backtrace(regs, tsk);
+		dump_backtrace(regs, tsk, KERN_EMERG);
 		dump_instr(KERN_EMERG, regs);
 	}
 
-- 
2.26.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCHv3 07/50] arm: Wire up dump_backtrace_{entry,stm}
       [not found] <20200418201944.482088-1-dima@arista.com>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-04-18 20:19 ` [PATCHv3 06/50] arm: Add loglvl to dump_backtrace() Dmitry Safonov
@ 2020-04-18 20:19 ` Dmitry Safonov
  2020-04-18 20:19 ` [PATCHv3 08/50] arm: Add show_stack_loglvl() Dmitry Safonov
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Safonov @ 2020-04-18 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Petr Mladek, Dmitry Safonov, Tetsuo Handa, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
	Dmitry Safonov, Russell King, Steven Rostedt, Sergey Senozhatsky,
	clang-built-linux, Jiri Slaby, Andrew Morton, Will Deacon,
	Ingo Molnar, linux-arm-kernel

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.

Now that c_backtrace() always emits correct loglvl, use it for printing.

Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
index 0f09ace18e6c..e1be6c85327c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
@@ -68,13 +68,15 @@ void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, unsigned long from,
 	unsigned long end = frame + 4 + sizeof(struct pt_regs);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KALLSYMS
-	printk("[<%08lx>] (%ps) from [<%08lx>] (%pS)\n", where, (void *)where, from, (void *)from);
+	printk("%s[<%08lx>] (%ps) from [<%08lx>] (%pS)\n",
+		loglvl, where, (void *)where, from, (void *)from);
 #else
-	printk("Function entered at [<%08lx>] from [<%08lx>]\n", where, from);
+	printk("%sFunction entered at [<%08lx>] from [<%08lx>]\n",
+		loglvl, where, from);
 #endif
 
 	if (in_entry_text(from) && end <= ALIGN(frame, THREAD_SIZE))
-		dump_mem("", "Exception stack", frame + 4, end);
+		dump_mem(loglvl, "Exception stack", frame + 4, end);
 }
 
 void dump_backtrace_stm(u32 *stack, u32 instruction, const char *loglvl)
@@ -89,12 +91,12 @@ void dump_backtrace_stm(u32 *stack, u32 instruction, const char *loglvl)
 			if (++x == 6) {
 				x = 0;
 				p = str;
-				printk("%s\n", str);
+				printk("%s%s\n", loglvl, str);
 			}
 		}
 	}
 	if (p != str)
-		printk("%s\n", str);
+		printk("%s%s\n", loglvl, str);
 }
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND
-- 
2.26.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCHv3 08/50] arm: Add show_stack_loglvl()
       [not found] <20200418201944.482088-1-dima@arista.com>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-04-18 20:19 ` [PATCHv3 07/50] arm: Wire up dump_backtrace_{entry,stm} Dmitry Safonov
@ 2020-04-18 20:19 ` Dmitry Safonov
  2020-04-18 20:19 ` [PATCHv3 09/50] arm64: Add loglvl to dump_backtrace() Dmitry Safonov
  2020-04-18 20:19 ` [PATCHv3 10/50] arm64: Add show_stack_loglvl() Dmitry Safonov
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Safonov @ 2020-04-18 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Petr Mladek, Dmitry Safonov, Tetsuo Handa, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
	Dmitry Safonov, Russell King, Steven Rostedt, Sergey Senozhatsky,
	clang-built-linux, Jiri Slaby, Andrew Morton, Will Deacon,
	Ingo Molnar, linux-arm-kernel

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.

Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().

Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
index e1be6c85327c..00455b5bbf8a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
@@ -247,12 +247,18 @@ static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
 }
 #endif
 
-void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp)
+void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp,
+		       const char *loglvl)
 {
-	dump_backtrace(NULL, tsk, KERN_DEFAULT);
+	dump_backtrace(NULL, tsk, loglvl);
 	barrier();
 }
 
+void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp)
+{
+	show_stack_loglvl(tsk, sp, KERN_DEFAULT);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
 #define S_PREEMPT " PREEMPT"
 #elif defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
-- 
2.26.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCHv3 09/50] arm64: Add loglvl to dump_backtrace()
       [not found] <20200418201944.482088-1-dima@arista.com>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-04-18 20:19 ` [PATCHv3 08/50] arm: Add show_stack_loglvl() Dmitry Safonov
@ 2020-04-18 20:19 ` Dmitry Safonov
  2020-04-18 20:19 ` [PATCHv3 10/50] arm64: Add show_stack_loglvl() Dmitry Safonov
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Safonov @ 2020-04-18 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Petr Mladek, Catalin Marinas, Dmitry Safonov, Tetsuo Handa,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, Dmitry Safonov, Russell King, Steven Rostedt,
	Sergey Senozhatsky, Jiri Slaby, Andrew Morton, Will Deacon,
	Ingo Molnar, linux-arm-kernel

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.

Add log level argument to dump_backtrace() as a preparation for
introducing show_stack_loglvl().

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h |  3 ++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c         |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c           | 15 ++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 4d9b1f48dc39..fdb913cc0bcb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ struct stackframe {
 extern int unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame);
 extern void walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame,
 			    int (*fn)(struct stackframe *, void *), void *data);
-extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk);
+extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
+			   const char *loglvl);
 
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long *, irq_stack_ptr);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 56be4cbf771f..360d3c8b9bb4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
 void show_regs(struct pt_regs * regs)
 {
 	__show_regs(regs);
-	dump_backtrace(regs, NULL);
+	dump_backtrace(regs, NULL, KERN_DEFAULT);
 }
 
 static void tls_thread_flush(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index cf402be5c573..6e777cbd4eb5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -53,9 +53,9 @@ static const char *handler[]= {
 
 int show_unhandled_signals = 0;
 
-static void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where)
+static void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, const char *loglvl)
 {
-	printk(" %pS\n", (void *)where);
+	printk("%s %pS\n", loglvl, (void *)where);
 }
 
 static void dump_kernel_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -83,7 +83,8 @@ static void dump_kernel_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	printk("%sCode: %s\n", lvl, str);
 }
 
-void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
+void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
+		    const char *loglvl)
 {
 	struct stackframe frame;
 	int skip = 0;
@@ -115,11 +116,11 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 				thread_saved_pc(tsk));
 	}
 
-	printk("Call trace:\n");
+	printk("%sCall trace:\n", loglvl);
 	do {
 		/* skip until specified stack frame */
 		if (!skip) {
-			dump_backtrace_entry(frame.pc);
+			dump_backtrace_entry(frame.pc, loglvl);
 		} else if (frame.fp == regs->regs[29]) {
 			skip = 0;
 			/*
@@ -129,7 +130,7 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 			 * at which an exception has taken place, use regs->pc
 			 * instead.
 			 */
-			dump_backtrace_entry(regs->pc);
+			dump_backtrace_entry(regs->pc, loglvl);
 		}
 	} while (!unwind_frame(tsk, &frame));
 
@@ -138,7 +139,7 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 
 void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp)
 {
-	dump_backtrace(NULL, tsk);
+	dump_backtrace(NULL, tsk, KERN_DEFAULT);
 	barrier();
 }
 
-- 
2.26.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCHv3 10/50] arm64: Add show_stack_loglvl()
       [not found] <20200418201944.482088-1-dima@arista.com>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-04-18 20:19 ` [PATCHv3 09/50] arm64: Add loglvl to dump_backtrace() Dmitry Safonov
@ 2020-04-18 20:19 ` Dmitry Safonov
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Safonov @ 2020-04-18 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Petr Mladek, Catalin Marinas, Dmitry Safonov, Tetsuo Handa,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, Dmitry Safonov, Russell King, Steven Rostedt,
	Sergey Senozhatsky, Jiri Slaby, Andrew Morton, Will Deacon,
	Ingo Molnar, linux-arm-kernel

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.

Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index 6e777cbd4eb5..516e92332fd0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -137,12 +137,18 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
 	put_task_stack(tsk);
 }
 
-void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp)
+void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp,
+		       const char *loglvl)
 {
-	dump_backtrace(NULL, tsk, KERN_DEFAULT);
+	dump_backtrace(NULL, tsk, loglvl);
 	barrier();
 }
 
+void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp)
+{
+	show_stack_loglvl(tsk, sp, KERN_DEFAULT);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
 #define S_PREEMPT " PREEMPT"
 #elif defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
-- 
2.26.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-18 20:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20200418201944.482088-1-dima@arista.com>
2020-04-18 20:18 ` [PATCHv3 04/50] arm/asm: Add loglvl to c_backtrace() Dmitry Safonov
2020-04-18 20:18 ` [PATCHv3 05/50] arm: Add loglvl to unwind_backtrace() Dmitry Safonov
2020-04-18 20:19 ` [PATCHv3 06/50] arm: Add loglvl to dump_backtrace() Dmitry Safonov
2020-04-18 20:19 ` [PATCHv3 07/50] arm: Wire up dump_backtrace_{entry,stm} Dmitry Safonov
2020-04-18 20:19 ` [PATCHv3 08/50] arm: Add show_stack_loglvl() Dmitry Safonov
2020-04-18 20:19 ` [PATCHv3 09/50] arm64: Add loglvl to dump_backtrace() Dmitry Safonov
2020-04-18 20:19 ` [PATCHv3 10/50] arm64: Add show_stack_loglvl() Dmitry Safonov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).