linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] treewide: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
@ 2020-05-07 18:53 Gustavo A. R. Silva
  2020-05-22 21:24 ` Li Yang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2020-05-07 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Li Yang; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/fsl/bestcomm/bestcomm.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/fsl/bestcomm/bestcomm.h b/include/linux/fsl/bestcomm/bestcomm.h
index a0e2e6b19b57..154e541ce57e 100644
--- a/include/linux/fsl/bestcomm/bestcomm.h
+++ b/include/linux/fsl/bestcomm/bestcomm.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
  */
 struct bcom_bd {
 	u32	status;
-	u32	data[0];	/* variable payload size */
+	u32	data[];	/* variable payload size */
 };
 
 /* ======================================================================== */


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] treewide: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
  2020-05-07 18:53 [PATCH] treewide: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2020-05-22 21:24 ` Li Yang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Li Yang @ 2020-05-22 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gustavo A. R. Silva
  Cc: linuxppc-dev, lkml,
	moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 1:49 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavoars@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
>
> struct foo {
>         int stuff;
>         struct boo array[];
> };
>
> By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
>
> Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
> this change:
>
> "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
> may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
> zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
>
> sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
> members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
> which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
> zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
> some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
> help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
>
> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
> [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/fsl/bestcomm/bestcomm.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Applied for next.  Thanks.

Regards,
Leo

>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fsl/bestcomm/bestcomm.h b/include/linux/fsl/bestcomm/bestcomm.h
> index a0e2e6b19b57..154e541ce57e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fsl/bestcomm/bestcomm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fsl/bestcomm/bestcomm.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>   */
>  struct bcom_bd {
>         u32     status;
> -       u32     data[0];        /* variable payload size */
> +       u32     data[]; /* variable payload size */
>  };
>
>  /* ======================================================================== */
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-22 21:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-07 18:53 [PATCH] treewide: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-05-22 21:24 ` Li Yang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).