[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 03/14] arm64: dts: rockchip: fix rk3399-puma vcc5v0-host gpio

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 03/14] arm64: dts: rockchip: fix rk3399-puma vcc5v0-host gpio

[Sasha Levin]

From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>

[ Upstream commit 7a7184f6cfa9279f1a1c10a1845d247d7fad54ff ]

The puma vcc5v0_host regulator node currently uses opposite active-values
for the enable pin. The gpio-declaration uses active-high while the
separate enable-active-low property marks the pin as active low.

While on the kernel side this works ok, other DT users may get
confused - as seen with uboot right now.

So bring this in line and make both properties match, similar to the
gmac fix.

Fixes: 2c66fc34e945 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200604091239.424318-1-heiko@sntech.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi
index 1fc5060d7027e..b08a998ca1024 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys {
 
 	vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
 		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
-		gpio = <&gpio4 RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		gpio = <&gpio4 RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
 		enable-active-low;
 		pinctrl-names = "default";
 		pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en>;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 04/14] arm64: dts: rockchip: fix rk3399-puma gmac reset gpio

[Sasha Levin]

From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>

[ Upstream commit 8a445086f8af0b7b9bd8d1901d6f306bb154f70d ]

The puma gmac node currently uses opposite active-values for the
gmac phy reset pin. The gpio-declaration uses active-high while the
separate snps,reset-active-low property marks the pin as active low.

While on the kernel side this works ok, other DT users may get
confused - as seen with uboot right now.

So bring this in line and make both properties match, similar to the
other Rockchip board.

Fixes: 2c66fc34e945 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200603132836.362519-1-heiko@sntech.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi
index b08a998ca1024..0d5679380b2a6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ &gmac {
 	phy-mode = "rgmii";
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
 	pinctrl-0 = <&rgmii_pins>;
-	snps,reset-gpio = <&gpio3 RK_PC0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+	snps,reset-gpio = <&gpio3 RK_PC0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
 	snps,reset-active-low;
 	snps,reset-delays-us = <0 10000 50000>;
 	tx_delay = <0x10>;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 07/14] arm64: dts: exynos: Fix silent hang after boot on Espresso

[Sasha Levin]

From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>

[ Upstream commit b072714bfc0e42c984b8fd6e069f3ca17de8137a ]

Once regulators are disabled after kernel boot, on Espresso board silent
hang observed because of LDO7 being disabled.  LDO7 actually provide
power to CPU cores and non-cpu blocks circuitries.  Keep this regulator
always-on to fix this hang.

Fixes: 9589f7721e16 ("arm64: dts: Add S2MPS15 PMIC node on exynos7-espresso")
Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7-espresso.dts | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7-espresso.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7-espresso.dts
index 4a8b1fb51243c..c8824b918693d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7-espresso.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7-espresso.dts
@@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ ldo7_reg: LDO7 {
 				regulator-min-microvolt = <700000>;
 				regulator-max-microvolt = <1150000>;
 				regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <125>;
+				regulator-always-on;
 			};
 
 			ldo8_reg: LDO8 {
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 12/14] ARM: at91: pm: add missing put_device() call in at91_pm_sram_init()

[Sasha Levin]

From: yu kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit f87a4f022c44e5b87e842a9f3e644fba87e8385f ]

if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, at91_pm_sram_init() doesn't have
a corresponding put_device(). Thus add a jump target to fix the exception
handling for this function implementation.

Fixes: d2e467905596 ("ARM: at91: pm: use the mmio-sram pool to access SRAM")
Signed-off-by: yu kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200604123301.3905837-1-yukuai3@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
index 849014c01cf4d..bebaa0b0aef40 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
@@ -456,13 +456,13 @@ static void __init at91_pm_sram_init(void)
 	sram_pool = gen_pool_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
 	if (!sram_pool) {
 		pr_warn("%s: sram pool unavailable!\n", __func__);
-		return;
+		goto out_put_device;
 	}
 
 	sram_base = gen_pool_alloc(sram_pool, at91_pm_suspend_in_sram_sz);
 	if (!sram_base) {
 		pr_warn("%s: unable to alloc sram!\n", __func__);
-		return;
+		goto out_put_device;
 	}
 
 	sram_pbase = gen_pool_virt_to_phys(sram_pool, sram_base);
@@ -470,12 +470,17 @@ static void __init at91_pm_sram_init(void)
 					at91_pm_suspend_in_sram_sz, false);
 	if (!at91_suspend_sram_fn) {
 		pr_warn("SRAM: Could not map\n");
-		return;
+		goto out_put_device;
 	}
 
 	/* Copy the pm suspend handler to SRAM */
 	at91_suspend_sram_fn = fncpy(at91_suspend_sram_fn,
 			&at91_pm_suspend_in_sram, at91_pm_suspend_in_sram_sz);
+	return;
+
+out_put_device:
+	put_device(&pdev->dev);
+	return;
 }
 
 static void __init at91_pm_backup_init(void)
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 14/14] ARM: socfpga: PM: add missing put_device() call in socfpga_setup_ocram_self_refresh()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit 3ad7b4e8f89d6bcc9887ca701cf2745a6aedb1a0 ]

if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, socfpga_setup_ocram_self_refresh
doesn't have a corresponding put_device(). Thus add a jump target to
fix the exception handling for this function implementation.

Fixes: 44fd8c7d4005 ("ARM: socfpga: support suspend to ram")
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/pm.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/pm.c
index c378ab0c24317..93f2245c97750 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/pm.c
@@ -60,14 +60,14 @@ static int socfpga_setup_ocram_self_refresh(void)
 	if (!ocram_pool) {
 		pr_warn("%s: ocram pool unavailable!\n", __func__);
 		ret = -ENODEV;
-		goto put_node;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 
 	ocram_base = gen_pool_alloc(ocram_pool, socfpga_sdram_self_refresh_sz);
 	if (!ocram_base) {
 		pr_warn("%s: unable to alloc ocram!\n", __func__);
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto put_node;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 
 	ocram_pbase = gen_pool_virt_to_phys(ocram_pool, ocram_base);
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static int socfpga_setup_ocram_self_refresh(void)
 	if (!suspend_ocram_base) {
 		pr_warn("%s: __arm_ioremap_exec failed!\n", __func__);
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto put_node;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 
 	/* Copy the code that puts DDR in self refresh to ocram */
@@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ static int socfpga_setup_ocram_self_refresh(void)
 	if (!socfpga_sdram_self_refresh_in_ocram)
 		ret = -EFAULT;
 
+put_device:
+	put_device(&pdev->dev);
 put_node:
 	of_node_put(np);
 
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel