From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Cc: Souvik Chakravarty <Souvik.Chakravarty@arm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] firmware: arm_scmi: fix transfer missing re-initialization
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:20:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201009152051.qjxdg3goqqmdtr74@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN5uoS9EGrzoaJ7tA__A=dPx2Y1Cp=v2THMm9YJTrOLUpkaggg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 02:38:16PM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 23:18, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 04:37:19PM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote:
> > > Implement helper function scmi_do_xfer_again() to process consecutive
> > > transfers that are initialized only once with scmi_xfer_get_init()
> > > and hence get the pool completion and responses message length not
> > > reloaded regarding last completed transfer.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 2 ++
> > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 2 +-
> > > 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c
> > > index 9853bd3c4d45..508f214baa1b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c
> > > @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int scmi_base_implementation_list_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
> > > /* Set the number of protocols to be skipped/already read */
> > > *num_skip = cpu_to_le32(tot_num_ret);
> > >
> > > - ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t);
> > > + ret = scmi_do_xfer_again(handle, t);
> > > if (ret)
> > > break;
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
> > > index c1cfe3ee3d55..9bb54c1a8d55 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
> > > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ scmi_clock_describe_rates_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 clk_id,
> > > /* Set the number of rates to be skipped/already read */
> > > clk_desc->rate_index = cpu_to_le32(tot_rate_cnt);
> > >
> > > - ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t);
> > > + ret = scmi_do_xfer_again(handle, t);
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto err;
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
> > > index 37fb583f1bf5..6d4eea7b0f3e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
> > > @@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ struct scmi_xfer {
> > >
> > > void scmi_xfer_put(const struct scmi_handle *h, struct scmi_xfer *xfer);
> > > int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *h, struct scmi_xfer *xfer);
> > > +int scmi_do_xfer_again(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
> > > + struct scmi_xfer *xfer);
> > > int scmi_do_xfer_with_response(const struct scmi_handle *h,
> > > struct scmi_xfer *xfer);
> > > int scmi_xfer_get_init(const struct scmi_handle *h, u8 msg_id, u8 prot_id,
> > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> > > index c5dea87edf8f..887cb8249db0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> > > @@ -402,6 +402,16 @@ int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +int scmi_do_xfer_again(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
> > > +{
> > > + struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle);
> > > +
> > > + xfer->rx.len = info->desc->max_msg_size;
> >
> > I am tempted to just have helper for above and use it where needed.
> > Or may be I just don't like the name of the function, how about
> > scmi_do_xfer_rxlen_reinit or anything else. Suggestions ?
>
> I think a smoother way would be that scmi_do_xfer() initializes
> both
> xfer->rx.len = info->desc->max_msg_size
Possibly
> and
> xfer->hdr.poll_completion = false
> instead of doing that from scmi_xfer_get_init().
>
> >
> > > + xfer->hdr.poll_completion = false;
> >
> > Do we really need the above ?
>
> I think so. Once a transfer is completed, poll_completion is true.
Where and how ? By default it is always false and it can be set to true
only by perf set/get calls. So I still see no need for this.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-09 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-08 14:37 [PATCH 1/5] firmware: arm_scmi: always initialize protocols Etienne Carriere
2020-10-08 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/5] firmware: arm_scmi: fix transfer missing re-initialization Etienne Carriere
2020-10-08 21:18 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-09 12:38 ` Etienne Carriere
2020-10-09 15:20 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-10-12 14:17 ` [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Add missing Rx size re-initialisation Sudeep Holla
2020-10-13 9:58 ` Etienne Carriere
2020-10-13 10:16 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-13 10:50 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-08 14:37 ` [PATCH 3/5] firmware: arm_scmi: add config dependency for smc transport Etienne Carriere
2020-10-08 21:08 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-09 12:33 ` Etienne Carriere
2020-10-09 15:58 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-12 10:11 ` Etienne Carriere
2020-10-08 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] firmware: arm_scmi: smc transport supports multi-message pool Etienne Carriere
2020-10-08 21:11 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-09 12:43 ` Etienne Carriere
2020-10-09 15:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-12 8:57 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-12 9:12 ` Etienne Carriere
2020-10-08 14:37 ` [PATCH 5/5] firmware: arm_scmi: fix ARCH_COLD_RESET Etienne Carriere
2020-10-08 21:16 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-08 19:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] firmware: arm_scmi: always initialize protocols Sudeep Holla
2020-10-09 12:31 ` Etienne Carriere
2020-10-09 16:31 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-12 9:32 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-13 10:45 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201009152051.qjxdg3goqqmdtr74@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Souvik.Chakravarty@arm.com \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).