linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
	linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: allwinner: dts: a64: add DT for PineTab developer sample
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 11:38:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201128103827.d6sfc2eumli2betx@gilmour> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <009A22D9-AF20-45C4-9674-13334B3EFFBA@aosc.io>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1524 bytes --]

On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 09:10:38PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> >> > Okay. But I'm not satisfied with a non-public sample occupies
> >> >> > the pinetab name. Is rename it to pinetab-dev and add a
> >> >> > pinetab-retail okay?
> >> >>
> >> >> To me, naming the production version anything but "pinetab" isn't
> >> >> satisfying either.
> >> >
> >> >I understand where you're coming from, but the point I was making my
> >> >previous mail is precisely that it's not really possible.
> >> >
> >> >You want to name the early adopter version _the_ production
> >> >version. Let's assume the hardware changes again between the early
> >> >adopter and mass-production version. Which one will be _the_
> >> >production version? The early-adopter or the mass-produced one?
> >> >
> >> >There's really no good answer here, and both would suck in their
> >> >own way. The only way to deal with this is to simply avoid
> >> >defining one version as the one true board, and just loading the
> >> >proper DT in u-boot based on whatever clue we have of the hardware
> >> >revision.
> >
> > > Then will it be okay to rename current pinetab DT to
> > > pinetab-sample and then introduce new DTs all with suffixes?
> >
> > No. From my previous mail:
> 
> It can be seen as dropping the PineTab DT and introduce new DTs with
> suffix.
> 
> Do we have rule that we cannot drop boards?

Are you really arguing that removing a DT and then adding an identical
one under a different name is not renaming it?

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-28 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-07 12:49 [PATCH 0/3] Switch PineTab DT LCD panel to retail one Icenowy Zheng
2020-11-07 12:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: allwinner: dts: a64: pinetab: switch LCD panel to production one Icenowy Zheng
2020-11-07 12:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: add PineTab developer sample DT binding Icenowy Zheng
2020-11-09 22:02   ` Rob Herring
2020-11-07 12:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: allwinner: dts: a64: add DT for PineTab developer sample Icenowy Zheng
2020-11-10 10:39   ` Maxime Ripard
2020-11-10 10:41     ` Icenowy Zheng
2020-11-16 15:55       ` Maxime Ripard
2020-11-16 18:36         ` [linux-sunxi] " Icenowy Zheng
2020-11-20 15:59           ` Maxime Ripard
2020-11-20 23:30             ` Icenowy Zheng
2020-11-21  2:51               ` Samuel Holland
2020-11-23 11:15                 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-11-23 11:25                   ` Icenowy Zheng
2020-11-23 12:53                     ` Maxime Ripard
2020-11-23 13:10                       ` Icenowy Zheng
2020-11-28 10:38                         ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2020-11-28 11:28                           ` Icenowy Zheng
2020-11-28 11:54                             ` Clément Péron
2020-11-28 11:59                               ` Icenowy Zheng
2020-11-28 21:07                                 ` Clément Péron
2020-12-01 10:35                                   ` Maxime Ripard
2020-12-06 21:03                                     ` Clément Péron
2020-12-07 10:07                                       ` Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201128103827.d6sfc2eumli2betx@gilmour \
    --to=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=icenowy@aosc.io \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@siol.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=samuel@sholland.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).