[PATCH] soc: rockchip: ROCKCHIP_GRF should not default to y, unconditionally

[PATCH] soc: rockchip: ROCKCHIP_GRF should not default to y, unconditionally

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Merely enabling CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST should not enable additional code.
To fix this, restrict the automatic enabling of ROCKCHIP_GRF to
ARCH_ROCKCHIP, and ask the user in case of compile-testing.

Fixes: 4c58063d4258f6be ("soc: rockchip: add driver handling grf setup")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
 drivers/soc/rockchip/Kconfig | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/rockchip/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/rockchip/Kconfig
index 2c13bf4dd5dbee76..25eb2c1e31bb2a08 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/rockchip/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/soc/rockchip/Kconfig
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ if ARCH_ROCKCHIP || COMPILE_TEST
 #
 
 config ROCKCHIP_GRF
-	bool
-	default y
+	bool "Rockchip General Register Files support" if COMPILE_TEST
+	default y if ARCH_ROCKCHIP
 	help
 	  The General Register Files are a central component providing
 	  special additional settings registers for a lot of soc-components.
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] soc: rockchip: ROCKCHIP_GRF should not default to y, unconditionally

[Heiko Stuebner]

On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 15:38:55 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Merely enabling CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST should not enable additional code.
> To fix this, restrict the automatic enabling of ROCKCHIP_GRF to
> ARCH_ROCKCHIP, and ask the user in case of compile-testing.

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] soc: rockchip: ROCKCHIP_GRF should not default to y, unconditionally
      commit: 2a1c55d4762dd34a8b0f2e36fb01b7b16b60735b

I actually found the old one deep down in my inbox some days ago,
so had applied that one already. Hope nothing changed with your
RESEND.


Best regards,
-- 
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] soc: rockchip: ROCKCHIP_GRF should not default to y, unconditionally

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Heiko,

On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:42 AM Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 15:38:55 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Merely enabling CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST should not enable additional code.
> > To fix this, restrict the automatic enabling of ROCKCHIP_GRF to
> > ARCH_ROCKCHIP, and ask the user in case of compile-testing.
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
> [1/1] soc: rockchip: ROCKCHIP_GRF should not default to y, unconditionally
>       commit: 2a1c55d4762dd34a8b0f2e36fb01b7b16b60735b
>
> I actually found the old one deep down in my inbox some days ago,
> so had applied that one already. Hope nothing changed with your
> RESEND.

They're identical, thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel