* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the irqchip tree with the sunxi tree
[not found] <20210201144259.102ae6ab@canb.auug.org.au>
@ 2021-02-14 22:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-18 4:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-02-14 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Zyngier, Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM
Cc: Samuel Holland, Paul Kocialkowski, Maxime Ripard,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Chen-Yu Tsai, Linux Next Mailing List,
Maxime Ripard
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2156 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:42:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the irqchip tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
>
> between commit:
>
> 752b0aac99c7 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun7i-nmi: Add binding documentation for the V3s NMI")
>
> from the sunxi tree and commit:
>
> ad6b47cdef76 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun6i-r: Split the binding from sun7i-nmi")
>
> from the irqchip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> index 4fd1e2780026,f34ecc8c7093..000000000000
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> @@@ -25,17 -25,7 +25,10 @@@ properties
> - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-sc-nmi
> deprecated: true
> - const: allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi
> - - items:
> - - const: allwinner,sun8i-a83t-r-intc
> - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc
> + - items:
> + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-nmi
> + - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> - - items:
> - - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-r-intc
> - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc
> - items:
> - const: allwinner,sun50i-a100-nmi
> - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
conflict still exists. It is now between the arm-soc tree and the
irqchip tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the irqchip tree with the sunxi tree
2021-02-14 22:11 ` linux-next: manual merge of the irqchip tree with the sunxi tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2021-02-18 4:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-26 10:22 ` Paul Kocialkowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-02-18 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Samuel Holland, Marc Zyngier, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Maxime Ripard, Paul Kocialkowski, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Linux Next Mailing List, Maxime Ripard
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2409 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:11:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:42:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the irqchip tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 752b0aac99c7 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun7i-nmi: Add binding documentation for the V3s NMI")
> >
> > from the sunxi tree and commit:
> >
> > ad6b47cdef76 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun6i-r: Split the binding from sun7i-nmi")
> >
> > from the irqchip tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> > when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> > particularly complex conflicts.
> >
> > diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > index 4fd1e2780026,f34ecc8c7093..000000000000
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > @@@ -25,17 -25,7 +25,10 @@@ properties
> > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-sc-nmi
> > deprecated: true
> > - const: allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi
> > - - items:
> > - - const: allwinner,sun8i-a83t-r-intc
> > - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc
> > + - items:
> > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-nmi
> > + - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> > - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> > - - items:
> > - - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-r-intc
> > - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc
> > - items:
> > - const: allwinner,sun50i-a100-nmi
> > - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
>
> With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
> conflict still exists. It is now between the arm-soc tree and the
> irqchip tree.
This is now a conflict between the arm-soc tree and the tip tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the irqchip tree with the sunxi tree
2021-02-18 4:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2021-02-26 10:22 ` Paul Kocialkowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Kocialkowski @ 2021-02-26 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Samuel Holland, Peter Zijlstra, Marc Zyngier,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maxime Ripard, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Linux Next Mailing List, Maxime Ripard, H. Peter Anvin,
Olof Johansson, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, ARM
Hi,
On Thu 18 Feb 21, 15:48, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:11:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:42:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the irqchip tree got a conflict in:
> > >
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > >
> > > between commit:
> > >
> > > 752b0aac99c7 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun7i-nmi: Add binding documentation for the V3s NMI")
> > >
> > > from the sunxi tree and commit:
> > >
> > > ad6b47cdef76 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun6i-r: Split the binding from sun7i-nmi")
> > >
> > > from the irqchip tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> > > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> > > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> > > when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> > > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> > > particularly complex conflicts.
> > >
> > > diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > > index 4fd1e2780026,f34ecc8c7093..000000000000
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > > @@@ -25,17 -25,7 +25,10 @@@ properties
> > > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-sc-nmi
> > > deprecated: true
> > > - const: allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi
> > > - - items:
> > > - - const: allwinner,sun8i-a83t-r-intc
> > > - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc
> > > + - items:
> > > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-nmi
> > > + - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> > > - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> > > - - items:
> > > - - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-r-intc
> > > - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc
> > > - items:
> > > - const: allwinner,sun50i-a100-nmi
> > > - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> >
> > With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
> > conflict still exists. It is now between the arm-soc tree and the
> > irqchip tree.
>
> This is now a conflict between the arm-soc tree and the tip tree.
The resolution looks correct to me!
Cheers,
Paul
--
Developer of free digital technology and hardware support.
Website: https://www.paulk.fr/
Coding blog: https://code.paulk.fr/
Git repositories: https://git.paulk.fr/ https://git.code.paulk.fr/
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-26 10:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20210201144259.102ae6ab@canb.auug.org.au>
2021-02-14 22:11 ` linux-next: manual merge of the irqchip tree with the sunxi tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-18 4:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-26 10:22 ` Paul Kocialkowski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).