linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/11] kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix MTE feature detection
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:53:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210319165334.29213-7-andre.przywara@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210319165334.29213-1-andre.przywara@arm.com>

To check whether the CPU and kernel support the MTE features we want
to test, we use an (emulated) CPU ID register read. However we only
check against a very particular feature version (0b0010), even though
the ARM ARM promises ID register features to be backwards compatible.

While this could be fixed by using ">=" instead of "==", we should
actually use the explicit HWCAP2_MTE hardware capability, exposed by the
kernel via the ELF auxiliary vectors.

That moves this responsibility to the kernel, and fixes running the
tests on machines with FEAT_MTE3 capability.

Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c | 13 ++-----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c
index 4e887dad762d..aa8a8a6b8b6d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c
@@ -291,22 +291,13 @@ int mte_switch_mode(int mte_option, unsigned long incl_mask)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#define ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT		8
-#define ID_AA64PFR1_MTE			2
-
 int mte_default_setup(void)
 {
-	unsigned long hwcaps = getauxval(AT_HWCAP);
+	unsigned long hwcaps2 = getauxval(AT_HWCAP2);
 	unsigned long en = 0;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!(hwcaps & HWCAP_CPUID)) {
-		ksft_print_msg("FAIL: CPUID registers unavailable\n");
-		return KSFT_FAIL;
-	}
-	/* Read ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 register */
-	asm volatile("mrs %0, id_aa64pfr1_el1" : "=r"(hwcaps) : : "memory");
-	if (((hwcaps >> ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT) & MT_TAG_MASK) != ID_AA64PFR1_MTE) {
+	if (!(hwcaps2 & HWCAP2_MTE)) {
 		ksft_print_msg("FAIL: MTE features unavailable\n");
 		return KSFT_SKIP;
 	}
-- 
2.17.5


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-19 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-19 16:53 [PATCH 00/11] kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix feature detection and compilation Andre Przywara
2021-03-19 16:53 ` [PATCH 01/11] kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix compilation with native compiler Andre Przywara
2021-03-19 17:29   ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-03-19 16:53 ` [PATCH 02/11] kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix pthread linking Andre Przywara
2021-03-19 16:53 ` [PATCH 03/11] kselftest/arm64: mte: ksm_options: Fix fscanf warning Andre Przywara
2021-03-19 16:53 ` [PATCH 04/11] kselftest/arm64: mte: user_mem: Fix write() warning Andre Przywara
2021-03-19 16:53 ` [PATCH 05/11] kselftest/arm64: mte: common: Fix write() warnings Andre Przywara
2021-03-19 16:53 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2021-03-19 16:53 ` [PATCH 07/11] kselftest/arm64: mte: Use cross-compiler if specified Andre Przywara
2021-03-19 16:53 ` [PATCH 08/11] kselftest/arm64: mte: Output warning about failing compiler Andre Przywara
2021-03-19 16:53 ` [PATCH 09/11] kselftest/arm64: mte: Makefile: Fix clang compilation Andre Przywara
2021-03-19 16:53 ` [PATCH 10/11] kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix clang warning Andre Przywara
2021-03-19 17:36   ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-03-19 16:53 ` [PATCH 11/11] kselftest/arm64: mte: Report filename on failing temp file creation Andre Przywara
2021-03-19 17:12 ` [PATCH 00/11] kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix feature detection and compilation Mark Brown
2021-03-23 17:54 ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210319165334.29213-7-andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).