* [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mailbox: imx-mu: add i.MX8ULP MU support
2021-05-07 10:19 [PATCH 0/4] mailbox: imx: add i.MX8ULP MU support Peng Fan (OSS)
@ 2021-05-07 10:19 ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2021-05-10 15:49 ` Rob Herring
2021-05-07 10:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] mailbox: imx: replace the xTR/xRR array with single register Peng Fan (OSS)
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan (OSS) @ 2021-05-07 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jassisinghbrar, robh+dt, shawnguo, s.hauer, o.rempel
Cc: kernel, festevam, aisheng.dong, linux-imx, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Peng Fan
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
The register layout and bits definition of i.MX8ULP MU is different
compared with others, let's add the compatible for the new MU.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml
index 1a3dff277e2b..675ad9de15bb 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ properties:
oneOf:
- const: fsl,imx6sx-mu
- const: fsl,imx7ulp-mu
+ - const: fsl,imx8ulp-mu
- const: fsl,imx8-mu-scu
- items:
- enum:
--
2.30.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mailbox: imx-mu: add i.MX8ULP MU support
2021-05-07 10:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mailbox: imx-mu: " Peng Fan (OSS)
@ 2021-05-10 15:49 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2021-05-10 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Fan (OSS)
Cc: Peng Fan, devicetree, festevam, aisheng.dong, s.hauer, robh+dt,
linux-imx, kernel, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
jassisinghbrar, o.rempel, shawnguo
On Fri, 07 May 2021 18:19:23 +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> The register layout and bits definition of i.MX8ULP MU is different
> compared with others, let's add the compatible for the new MU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/4] mailbox: imx: replace the xTR/xRR array with single register
2021-05-07 10:19 [PATCH 0/4] mailbox: imx: add i.MX8ULP MU support Peng Fan (OSS)
2021-05-07 10:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mailbox: imx-mu: " Peng Fan (OSS)
@ 2021-05-07 10:19 ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2021-05-26 6:58 ` Daniel Baluta
2021-05-07 10:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] mailbox: imx: add xSR/xCR register array Peng Fan (OSS)
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan (OSS) @ 2021-05-07 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jassisinghbrar, robh+dt, shawnguo, s.hauer, o.rempel
Cc: kernel, festevam, aisheng.dong, linux-imx, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Peng Fan
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
The xTR/xRR registers are using 4 bytes stride and continuous.
Considering we will support more TR and RR registers, use base + idx * 4
method to calculate register address, not hardcoding in driver.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
index 2543c7b6948b..bd7758c32a80 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
@@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ struct imx_mu_dcfg {
int (*tx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp, void *data);
int (*rx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp);
void (*init)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv);
- u32 xTR[4]; /* Transmit Registers */
- u32 xRR[4]; /* Receive Registers */
+ u32 xTR; /* Transmit Register0 */
+ u32 xRR; /* Receive Register0 */
u32 xSR; /* Status Register */
u32 xCR; /* Control Register */
};
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
switch (cp->type) {
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
- imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR[cp->idx]);
+ imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR + cp->idx * 4);
imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
break;
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB:
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
{
u32 dat;
- dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[cp->idx]);
+ dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (cp->idx) * 4);
mbox_chan_received_data(cp->chan, (void *)&dat);
return 0;
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
}
for (i = 0; i < 4 && i < msg->hdr.size; i++)
- imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR[i % 4]);
+ imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR + (i % 4) * 4);
for (; i < msg->hdr.size; i++) {
ret = readl_poll_timeout(priv->base + priv->dcfg->xSR,
xsr,
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
dev_err(priv->dev, "Send data index: %d timeout\n", i);
return ret;
}
- imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR[i % 4]);
+ imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR + (i % 4) * 4);
}
imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
u32 xsr;
imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0));
- *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[0]);
+ *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR);
if (msg.hdr.size > sizeof(msg) / 4) {
dev_err(priv->dev, "Maximal message size (%zu bytes) exceeded on RX; got: %i bytes\n", sizeof(msg), msg.hdr.size << 2);
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
dev_err(priv->dev, "timeout read idx %d\n", i);
return ret;
}
- *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[i % 4]);
+ *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (i % 4) * 4);
}
imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0), 0);
@@ -564,8 +564,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx = {
.tx = imx_mu_generic_tx,
.rx = imx_mu_generic_rx,
.init = imx_mu_init_generic,
- .xTR = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
- .xRR = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
+ .xTR = 0x0,
+ .xRR = 0x10,
.xSR = 0x20,
.xCR = 0x24,
};
@@ -574,8 +574,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
.tx = imx_mu_generic_tx,
.rx = imx_mu_generic_rx,
.init = imx_mu_init_generic,
- .xTR = {0x20, 0x24, 0x28, 0x2c},
- .xRR = {0x40, 0x44, 0x48, 0x4c},
+ .xTR = 0x20,
+ .xRR = 0x40,
.xSR = 0x60,
.xCR = 0x64,
};
@@ -584,8 +584,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu = {
.tx = imx_mu_scu_tx,
.rx = imx_mu_scu_rx,
.init = imx_mu_init_scu,
- .xTR = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
- .xRR = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
+ .xTR = 0x0
+ .xRR = 0x10
.xSR = 0x20,
.xCR = 0x24,
};
--
2.30.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/4] mailbox: imx: replace the xTR/xRR array with single register
2021-05-07 10:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] mailbox: imx: replace the xTR/xRR array with single register Peng Fan (OSS)
@ 2021-05-26 6:58 ` Daniel Baluta
2021-05-27 0:36 ` Peng Fan (OSS)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Baluta @ 2021-05-26 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Fan (OSS)
Cc: Jassi Brar, Rob Herring, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer, Oleksij Rempel,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Aisheng Dong,
dl-linux-imx, Devicetree List, linux-arm-kernel,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Peng Fan
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 3:33 PM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> wrote:
>
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> The xTR/xRR registers are using 4 bytes stride and continuous.
> Considering we will support more TR and RR registers, use base + idx * 4
> method to calculate register address, not hardcoding in driver.
>
Peng, this means that for imx8ul the Tx registers are not continuous
right? Please make this clear in
the commit message.
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> index 2543c7b6948b..bd7758c32a80 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> @@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ struct imx_mu_dcfg {
> int (*tx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp, void *data);
> int (*rx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp);
> void (*init)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv);
> - u32 xTR[4]; /* Transmit Registers */
> - u32 xRR[4]; /* Receive Registers */
> + u32 xTR; /* Transmit Register0 */
> + u32 xRR; /* Receive Register0 */
> u32 xSR; /* Status Register */
> u32 xCR; /* Control Register */
> };
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
>
> switch (cp->type) {
> case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
> - imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR[cp->idx]);
> + imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR + cp->idx * 4);
> imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
> break;
> case IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB:
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
> {
> u32 dat;
>
> - dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[cp->idx]);
> + dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (cp->idx) * 4);
> mbox_chan_received_data(cp->chan, (void *)&dat);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < 4 && i < msg->hdr.size; i++)
> - imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR[i % 4]);
> + imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR + (i % 4) * 4);
> for (; i < msg->hdr.size; i++) {
> ret = readl_poll_timeout(priv->base + priv->dcfg->xSR,
> xsr,
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
> dev_err(priv->dev, "Send data index: %d timeout\n", i);
> return ret;
> }
> - imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR[i % 4]);
> + imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR + (i % 4) * 4);
> }
>
> imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
> u32 xsr;
>
> imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0));
> - *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[0]);
> + *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR);
>
> if (msg.hdr.size > sizeof(msg) / 4) {
> dev_err(priv->dev, "Maximal message size (%zu bytes) exceeded on RX; got: %i bytes\n", sizeof(msg), msg.hdr.size << 2);
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
> dev_err(priv->dev, "timeout read idx %d\n", i);
> return ret;
> }
> - *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[i % 4]);
> + *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (i % 4) * 4);
> }
>
> imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0), 0);
> @@ -564,8 +564,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx = {
> .tx = imx_mu_generic_tx,
> .rx = imx_mu_generic_rx,
> .init = imx_mu_init_generic,
> - .xTR = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
> - .xRR = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
> + .xTR = 0x0,
> + .xRR = 0x10,
> .xSR = 0x20,
> .xCR = 0x24,
> };
> @@ -574,8 +574,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
> .tx = imx_mu_generic_tx,
> .rx = imx_mu_generic_rx,
> .init = imx_mu_init_generic,
> - .xTR = {0x20, 0x24, 0x28, 0x2c},
> - .xRR = {0x40, 0x44, 0x48, 0x4c},
> + .xTR = 0x20,
> + .xRR = 0x40,
> .xSR = 0x60,
> .xCR = 0x64,
> };
> @@ -584,8 +584,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu = {
> .tx = imx_mu_scu_tx,
> .rx = imx_mu_scu_rx,
> .init = imx_mu_init_scu,
> - .xTR = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
> - .xRR = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
> + .xTR = 0x0
> + .xRR = 0x10
> .xSR = 0x20,
> .xCR = 0x24,
> };
> --
> 2.30.0
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/4] mailbox: imx: replace the xTR/xRR array with single register
2021-05-26 6:58 ` Daniel Baluta
@ 2021-05-27 0:36 ` Peng Fan (OSS)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan (OSS) @ 2021-05-27 0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Baluta
Cc: Jassi Brar, Rob Herring, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer, Oleksij Rempel,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Aisheng Dong,
dl-linux-imx, Devicetree List, linux-arm-kernel,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Peng Fan
On 2021/5/26 14:58, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 3:33 PM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>>
>> The xTR/xRR registers are using 4 bytes stride and continuous.
>> Considering we will support more TR and RR registers, use base + idx * 4
>> method to calculate register address, not hardcoding in driver.
>>
> Peng, this means that for imx8ul the Tx registers are not continuous
> right? Please make this clear in
> the commit message.
It is continuous, it support more than 4 registers, so we use idx * 4 to
calculate the address, not hardcoding in an array as before.
Thanks,
Peng.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
>> index 2543c7b6948b..bd7758c32a80 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
>> @@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ struct imx_mu_dcfg {
>> int (*tx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp, void *data);
>> int (*rx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp);
>> void (*init)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv);
>> - u32 xTR[4]; /* Transmit Registers */
>> - u32 xRR[4]; /* Receive Registers */
>> + u32 xTR; /* Transmit Register0 */
>> + u32 xRR; /* Receive Register0 */
>> u32 xSR; /* Status Register */
>> u32 xCR; /* Control Register */
>> };
>> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
>>
>> switch (cp->type) {
>> case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
>> - imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR[cp->idx]);
>> + imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR + cp->idx * 4);
>> imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
>> break;
>> case IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB:
>> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
>> {
>> u32 dat;
>>
>> - dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[cp->idx]);
>> + dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (cp->idx) * 4);
>> mbox_chan_received_data(cp->chan, (void *)&dat);
>>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
>> }
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < 4 && i < msg->hdr.size; i++)
>> - imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR[i % 4]);
>> + imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR + (i % 4) * 4);
>> for (; i < msg->hdr.size; i++) {
>> ret = readl_poll_timeout(priv->base + priv->dcfg->xSR,
>> xsr,
>> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
>> dev_err(priv->dev, "Send data index: %d timeout\n", i);
>> return ret;
>> }
>> - imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR[i % 4]);
>> + imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR + (i % 4) * 4);
>> }
>>
>> imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
>> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
>> u32 xsr;
>>
>> imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0));
>> - *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[0]);
>> + *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR);
>>
>> if (msg.hdr.size > sizeof(msg) / 4) {
>> dev_err(priv->dev, "Maximal message size (%zu bytes) exceeded on RX; got: %i bytes\n", sizeof(msg), msg.hdr.size << 2);
>> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
>> dev_err(priv->dev, "timeout read idx %d\n", i);
>> return ret;
>> }
>> - *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[i % 4]);
>> + *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (i % 4) * 4);
>> }
>>
>> imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0), 0);
>> @@ -564,8 +564,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx = {
>> .tx = imx_mu_generic_tx,
>> .rx = imx_mu_generic_rx,
>> .init = imx_mu_init_generic,
>> - .xTR = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
>> - .xRR = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
>> + .xTR = 0x0,
>> + .xRR = 0x10,
>> .xSR = 0x20,
>> .xCR = 0x24,
>> };
>> @@ -574,8 +574,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
>> .tx = imx_mu_generic_tx,
>> .rx = imx_mu_generic_rx,
>> .init = imx_mu_init_generic,
>> - .xTR = {0x20, 0x24, 0x28, 0x2c},
>> - .xRR = {0x40, 0x44, 0x48, 0x4c},
>> + .xTR = 0x20,
>> + .xRR = 0x40,
>> .xSR = 0x60,
>> .xCR = 0x64,
>> };
>> @@ -584,8 +584,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu = {
>> .tx = imx_mu_scu_tx,
>> .rx = imx_mu_scu_rx,
>> .init = imx_mu_init_scu,
>> - .xTR = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
>> - .xRR = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
>> + .xTR = 0x0
>> + .xRR = 0x10
>> .xSR = 0x20,
>> .xCR = 0x24,
>> };
>> --
>> 2.30.0
>>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4] mailbox: imx: add xSR/xCR register array
2021-05-07 10:19 [PATCH 0/4] mailbox: imx: add i.MX8ULP MU support Peng Fan (OSS)
2021-05-07 10:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mailbox: imx-mu: " Peng Fan (OSS)
2021-05-07 10:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] mailbox: imx: replace the xTR/xRR array with single register Peng Fan (OSS)
@ 2021-05-07 10:19 ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2021-05-07 10:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] mailbox: imx-mailbox: support i.MX8ULP MU Peng Fan (OSS)
2021-05-26 6:06 ` [PATCH 0/4] mailbox: imx: add i.MX8ULP MU support Peng Fan (OSS)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan (OSS) @ 2021-05-07 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jassisinghbrar, robh+dt, shawnguo, s.hauer, o.rempel
Cc: kernel, festevam, aisheng.dong, linux-imx, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Peng Fan
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
We are going to add a new platform which has 4 status registers(SR, TSR,
RSR, GSR) and 4 control registers(CR, TCR, RCR, GCR), so extend xSR
and xCR to register array and adapt code to use it.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
index bd7758c32a80..f5dadcc827aa 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
@@ -41,6 +41,21 @@ enum imx_mu_chan_type {
IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB, /* Rx doorbell */
};
+enum imx_mu_xcr {
+ IMX_MU_CR,
+ IMX_MU_GCR,
+ IMX_MU_TCR,
+ IMX_MU_RCR,
+ IMX_MU_xCR_MAX,
+};
+
+enum imx_mu_xsr {
+ IMX_MU_SR,
+ IMX_MU_GSR,
+ IMX_MU_TSR,
+ IMX_MU_RSR,
+};
+
struct imx_sc_rpc_msg_max {
struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr;
u32 data[7];
@@ -67,7 +82,7 @@ struct imx_mu_priv {
struct clk *clk;
int irq;
- u32 xcr;
+ u32 xcr[4];
bool side_b;
};
@@ -78,8 +93,8 @@ struct imx_mu_dcfg {
void (*init)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv);
u32 xTR; /* Transmit Register0 */
u32 xRR; /* Receive Register0 */
- u32 xSR; /* Status Register */
- u32 xCR; /* Control Register */
+ u32 xSR[4]; /* Status Registers */
+ u32 xCR[4]; /* Control Registers */
};
static struct imx_mu_priv *to_imx_mu_priv(struct mbox_controller *mbox)
@@ -97,16 +112,16 @@ static u32 imx_mu_read(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, u32 offs)
return ioread32(priv->base + offs);
}
-static u32 imx_mu_xcr_rmw(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, u32 set, u32 clr)
+static u32 imx_mu_xcr_rmw(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, enum imx_mu_xcr type, u32 set, u32 clr)
{
unsigned long flags;
u32 val;
spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
- val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
+ val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR[type]);
val &= ~clr;
val |= set;
- imx_mu_write(priv, val, priv->dcfg->xCR);
+ imx_mu_write(priv, val, priv->dcfg->xCR[type]);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
return val;
@@ -121,10 +136,10 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
switch (cp->type) {
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR + cp->idx * 4);
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_TCR, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
break;
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB:
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_GIRn(cp->idx), 0);
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_GCR, IMX_MU_xCR_GIRn(cp->idx), 0);
tasklet_schedule(&cp->txdb_tasklet);
break;
default:
@@ -174,7 +189,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
for (i = 0; i < 4 && i < msg->hdr.size; i++)
imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR + (i % 4) * 4);
for (; i < msg->hdr.size; i++) {
- ret = readl_poll_timeout(priv->base + priv->dcfg->xSR,
+ ret = readl_poll_timeout(priv->base + priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_TSR],
xsr,
xsr & IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(i % 4),
0, 100);
@@ -185,7 +200,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR + (i % 4) * 4);
}
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_TCR, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
break;
default:
dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev, "Send data on wrong channel type: %d\n", cp->type);
@@ -203,7 +218,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
int i, ret;
u32 xsr;
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0));
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0));
*data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR);
if (msg.hdr.size > sizeof(msg) / 4) {
@@ -212,7 +227,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
}
for (i = 1; i < msg.hdr.size; i++) {
- ret = readl_poll_timeout(priv->base + priv->dcfg->xSR, xsr,
+ ret = readl_poll_timeout(priv->base + priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_RSR], xsr,
xsr & IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(i % 4), 0, 100);
if (ret) {
dev_err(priv->dev, "timeout read idx %d\n", i);
@@ -221,7 +236,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
*data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (i % 4) * 4);
}
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0), 0);
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0), 0);
mbox_chan_received_data(cp->chan, (void *)&msg);
return 0;
@@ -241,19 +256,22 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = chan->con_priv;
u32 val, ctrl;
- ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
- val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xSR);
-
switch (cp->type) {
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
+ ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR[IMX_MU_TCR]);
+ val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_TSR]);
val &= IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(cp->idx) &
(ctrl & IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
break;
case IMX_MU_TYPE_RX:
+ ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR[IMX_MU_RCR]);
+ val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_RSR]);
val &= IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(cp->idx) &
(ctrl & IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(cp->idx));
break;
case IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB:
+ ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR[IMX_MU_GCR]);
+ val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_GSR]);
val &= IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx) &
(ctrl & IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(cp->idx));
break;
@@ -265,12 +283,12 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
return IRQ_NONE;
if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(cp->idx)) {
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_TCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
mbox_chan_txdone(chan, 0);
} else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(cp->idx)) {
priv->dcfg->rx(priv, cp);
} else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx)) {
- imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx), priv->dcfg->xSR);
+ imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx), priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_GSR]);
mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
} else {
dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev, "Not handled interrupt\n");
@@ -317,10 +335,10 @@ static int imx_mu_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
switch (cp->type) {
case IMX_MU_TYPE_RX:
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(cp->idx), 0);
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(cp->idx), 0);
break;
case IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB:
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(cp->idx), 0);
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_GCR, IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(cp->idx), 0);
break;
default:
break;
@@ -342,13 +360,13 @@ static void imx_mu_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
switch (cp->type) {
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_TCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
break;
case IMX_MU_TYPE_RX:
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(cp->idx));
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(cp->idx));
break;
case IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB:
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(cp->idx));
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_GCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(cp->idx));
break;
default:
break;
@@ -444,7 +462,8 @@ static void imx_mu_init_generic(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
return;
/* Set default MU configuration */
- imx_mu_write(priv, 0, priv->dcfg->xCR);
+ for (i = 0; i < IMX_MU_xCR_MAX; i++)
+ imx_mu_write(priv, 0, priv->dcfg->xCR[i]);
}
static void imx_mu_init_scu(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
@@ -466,7 +485,8 @@ static void imx_mu_init_scu(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
priv->mbox.of_xlate = imx_mu_scu_xlate;
/* Set default MU configuration */
- imx_mu_write(priv, 0, priv->dcfg->xCR);
+ for (i = 0; i < IMX_MU_xCR_MAX; i++)
+ imx_mu_write(priv, 0, priv->dcfg->xCR[i]);
}
static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -566,8 +586,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx = {
.init = imx_mu_init_generic,
.xTR = 0x0,
.xRR = 0x10,
- .xSR = 0x20,
- .xCR = 0x24,
+ .xSR = {0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20},
+ .xCR = {0x24, 0x24, 0x24, 0x24},
};
static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
@@ -576,8 +596,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
.init = imx_mu_init_generic,
.xTR = 0x20,
.xRR = 0x40,
- .xSR = 0x60,
- .xCR = 0x64,
+ .xSR = {0x60, 0x60, 0x60, 0x60},
+ .xCR = {0x64, 0x64, 0x64, 0x64},
};
static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu = {
@@ -586,8 +606,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu = {
.init = imx_mu_init_scu,
.xTR = 0x0
.xRR = 0x10
- .xSR = 0x20,
- .xCR = 0x24,
+ .xSR = {0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20},
+ .xCR = {0x24, 0x24, 0x24, 0x24},
};
static const struct of_device_id imx_mu_dt_ids[] = {
@@ -601,9 +621,12 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_mu_dt_ids);
static int __maybe_unused imx_mu_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
struct imx_mu_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int i;
- if (!priv->clk)
- priv->xcr = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
+ if (!priv->clk) {
+ for (i = 0; i < IMX_MU_xCR_MAX; i++)
+ priv->xcr[i] = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR[i]);
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -611,6 +634,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused imx_mu_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
static int __maybe_unused imx_mu_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
struct imx_mu_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int i;
/*
* ONLY restore MU when context lost, the TIE could
@@ -620,8 +644,10 @@ static int __maybe_unused imx_mu_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
* send failed, may lead to system freeze. This issue
* is observed by testing freeze mode suspend.
*/
- if (!imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR) && !priv->clk)
- imx_mu_write(priv, priv->xcr, priv->dcfg->xCR);
+ if (!imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR[0]) && !priv->clk) {
+ for (i = 0; i < IMX_MU_xCR_MAX; i++)
+ imx_mu_write(priv, priv->xcr[i], priv->dcfg->xCR[i]);
+ }
return 0;
}
--
2.30.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] mailbox: imx-mailbox: support i.MX8ULP MU
2021-05-07 10:19 [PATCH 0/4] mailbox: imx: add i.MX8ULP MU support Peng Fan (OSS)
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-07 10:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] mailbox: imx: add xSR/xCR register array Peng Fan (OSS)
@ 2021-05-07 10:19 ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2021-05-26 6:06 ` [PATCH 0/4] mailbox: imx: add i.MX8ULP MU support Peng Fan (OSS)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan (OSS) @ 2021-05-07 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jassisinghbrar, robh+dt, shawnguo, s.hauer, o.rempel
Cc: kernel, festevam, aisheng.dong, linux-imx, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Peng Fan
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
i.MX8ULP MU has different register layout and bit layout compared
with i.MX6SX/7ULP/8.
So add enum imx_mu_type to show it is IMX_MU_V2 or IMX_MU_V1.
For IMX_MU_V2 mu hardware, check it when calculating bit offset to get
the correct offset.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
index f5dadcc827aa..7fc5b4c2d3af 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
@@ -15,20 +15,6 @@
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
-#define IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
-#define IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(x) BIT(24 + (3 - (x)))
-#define IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(x) BIT(20 + (3 - (x)))
-#define IMX_MU_xSR_BRDIP BIT(9)
-
-/* General Purpose Interrupt Enable */
-#define IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
-/* Receive Interrupt Enable */
-#define IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(x) BIT(24 + (3 - (x)))
-/* Transmit Interrupt Enable */
-#define IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(x) BIT(20 + (3 - (x)))
-/* General Purpose Interrupt Request */
-#define IMX_MU_xCR_GIRn(x) BIT(16 + (3 - (x)))
-
#define IMX_MU_CHANS 16
/* TX0/RX0/RXDB[0-3] */
#define IMX_MU_SCU_CHANS 6
@@ -87,16 +73,36 @@ struct imx_mu_priv {
bool side_b;
};
+enum imx_mu_type {
+ IMX_MU_V1,
+ IMX_MU_V2,
+};
+
struct imx_mu_dcfg {
int (*tx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp, void *data);
int (*rx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp);
void (*init)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv);
+ enum imx_mu_type type;
u32 xTR; /* Transmit Register0 */
u32 xRR; /* Receive Register0 */
u32 xSR[4]; /* Status Registers */
u32 xCR[4]; /* Control Registers */
};
+#define IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(type, x) (type == IMX_MU_V2 ? BIT(x) : BIT(28 + (3 - (x))))
+#define IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(type, x) (type == IMX_MU_V2 ? BIT(x) : BIT(24 + (3 - (x))))
+#define IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(type, x) (type == IMX_MU_V2 ? BIT(x) : BIT(20 + (3 - (x))))
+
+/* General Purpose Interrupt Enable */
+#define IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(type, x) (type == IMX_MU_V2 ? BIT(x) : BIT(28 + (3 - (x))))
+/* Receive Interrupt Enable */
+#define IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(type, x) (type == IMX_MU_V2 ? BIT(x) : BIT(24 + (3 - (x))))
+/* Transmit Interrupt Enable */
+#define IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(type, x) (type == IMX_MU_V2 ? BIT(x) : BIT(20 + (3 - (x))))
+/* General Purpose Interrupt Request */
+#define IMX_MU_xCR_GIRn(type, x) (type == IMX_MU_V2 ? BIT(x) : BIT(16 + (3 - (x))))
+
+
static struct imx_mu_priv *to_imx_mu_priv(struct mbox_controller *mbox)
{
return container_of(mbox, struct imx_mu_priv, mbox);
@@ -136,10 +142,10 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
switch (cp->type) {
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR + cp->idx * 4);
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_TCR, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_TCR, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx), 0);
break;
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB:
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_GCR, IMX_MU_xCR_GIRn(cp->idx), 0);
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_GCR, IMX_MU_xCR_GIRn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx), 0);
tasklet_schedule(&cp->txdb_tasklet);
break;
default:
@@ -191,7 +197,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
for (; i < msg->hdr.size; i++) {
ret = readl_poll_timeout(priv->base + priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_TSR],
xsr,
- xsr & IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(i % 4),
+ xsr & IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(priv->dcfg->type, i % 4),
0, 100);
if (ret) {
dev_err(priv->dev, "Send data index: %d timeout\n", i);
@@ -200,7 +206,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR + (i % 4) * 4);
}
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_TCR, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_TCR, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx), 0);
break;
default:
dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev, "Send data on wrong channel type: %d\n", cp->type);
@@ -218,7 +224,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
int i, ret;
u32 xsr;
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0));
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv->dcfg->type, 0));
*data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR);
if (msg.hdr.size > sizeof(msg) / 4) {
@@ -228,7 +234,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
for (i = 1; i < msg.hdr.size; i++) {
ret = readl_poll_timeout(priv->base + priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_RSR], xsr,
- xsr & IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(i % 4), 0, 100);
+ xsr & IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(priv->dcfg->type, i % 4), 0, 100);
if (ret) {
dev_err(priv->dev, "timeout read idx %d\n", i);
return ret;
@@ -236,7 +242,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
*data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (i % 4) * 4);
}
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0), 0);
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv->dcfg->type, 0), 0);
mbox_chan_received_data(cp->chan, (void *)&msg);
return 0;
@@ -260,20 +266,20 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR[IMX_MU_TCR]);
val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_TSR]);
- val &= IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(cp->idx) &
- (ctrl & IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
+ val &= IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx) &
+ (ctrl & IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx));
break;
case IMX_MU_TYPE_RX:
ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR[IMX_MU_RCR]);
val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_RSR]);
- val &= IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(cp->idx) &
- (ctrl & IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(cp->idx));
+ val &= IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx) &
+ (ctrl & IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx));
break;
case IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB:
ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR[IMX_MU_GCR]);
val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_GSR]);
- val &= IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx) &
- (ctrl & IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(cp->idx));
+ val &= IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx) &
+ (ctrl & IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx));
break;
default:
break;
@@ -282,13 +288,17 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
if (!val)
return IRQ_NONE;
- if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(cp->idx)) {
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_TCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
+ if ((val == IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx)) &&
+ (cp->type == IMX_MU_TYPE_TX)) {
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_TCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx));
mbox_chan_txdone(chan, 0);
- } else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(cp->idx)) {
+ } else if ((val == IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx)) &&
+ (cp->type == IMX_MU_TYPE_RX)) {
priv->dcfg->rx(priv, cp);
- } else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx)) {
- imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx), priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_GSR]);
+ } else if ((val == IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx)) &&
+ (cp->type == IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB)) {
+ imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx),
+ priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_GSR]);
mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
} else {
dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev, "Not handled interrupt\n");
@@ -335,10 +345,10 @@ static int imx_mu_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
switch (cp->type) {
case IMX_MU_TYPE_RX:
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(cp->idx), 0);
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx), 0);
break;
case IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB:
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_GCR, IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(cp->idx), 0);
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_GCR, IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx), 0);
break;
default:
break;
@@ -360,13 +370,13 @@ static void imx_mu_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
switch (cp->type) {
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_TCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_TCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx));
break;
case IMX_MU_TYPE_RX:
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(cp->idx));
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx));
break;
case IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB:
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_GCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(cp->idx));
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_GCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx));
break;
default:
break;
@@ -600,12 +610,23 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
.xCR = {0x64, 0x64, 0x64, 0x64},
};
+static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx8ulp = {
+ .tx = imx_mu_generic_tx,
+ .rx = imx_mu_generic_rx,
+ .init = imx_mu_init_generic,
+ .type = IMX_MU_V2,
+ .xTR = 0x200,
+ .xRR = 0x280,
+ .xSR = {0xC, 0x118, 0x124, 0x12C},
+ .xCR = {0x8, 0x114, 0x120, 0x128},
+};
+
static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu = {
.tx = imx_mu_scu_tx,
.rx = imx_mu_scu_rx,
.init = imx_mu_init_scu,
- .xTR = 0x0
- .xRR = 0x10
+ .xTR = 0x0,
+ .xRR = 0x10,
.xSR = {0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20},
.xCR = {0x24, 0x24, 0x24, 0x24},
};
@@ -613,6 +634,7 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu = {
static const struct of_device_id imx_mu_dt_ids[] = {
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx8ulp },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8-mu-scu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu },
{ },
};
--
2.30.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/4] mailbox: imx: add i.MX8ULP MU support
2021-05-07 10:19 [PATCH 0/4] mailbox: imx: add i.MX8ULP MU support Peng Fan (OSS)
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-07 10:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] mailbox: imx-mailbox: support i.MX8ULP MU Peng Fan (OSS)
@ 2021-05-26 6:06 ` Peng Fan (OSS)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan (OSS) @ 2021-05-26 6:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jassisinghbrar, robh+dt, shawnguo, s.hauer, o.rempel
Cc: kernel, festevam, aisheng.dong, linux-imx, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Peng Fan
Hi Jassi, Shawn
On 2021/5/7 18:19, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> i.MX8ULP generic MU is a different IP compared with previous i.MX chips.
> It has different register layout and bit position, but the register name
> and bit definitions are almost same with previous i.MX MU.
>
> So we extend the current imx-mailbox driver to support i.MX8ULP.
Gentle ping.. Except dt-bindings patch get A-b from Rob,no comments.
Is it ok for you to pick up this patchset?
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> Peng Fan (4):
> dt-bindings: mailbox: imx-mu: add i.MX8ULP MU support
> mailbox: imx: replace the xTR/xRR array with single register
> mailbox: imx: add xSR/xCR register array
> mailbox: imx-mailbox: support i.MX8ULP MU
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml | 1 +
> drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 196 +++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread