[PATCH] dma-buf: remove restriction of IOCTL:DMA_BUF_SET_NAME

From: <guangming.cao@mediatek.com>
To: "Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
	<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
	<linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>, Guangming Cao <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH] dma-buf: remove restriction of IOCTL:DMA_BUF_SET_NAME
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 10:47:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211009024733.65676-1-guangming.cao@mediatek.com> (raw)

From: Guangming Cao <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>

If dma-buf don't want userspace users to touch the dmabuf buffer,
it seems we should add this restriction into dma_buf_ops.mmap,
not in this IOCTL:DMA_BUF_SET_NAME.

With this restriction, we can only know the kernel users of the dmabuf
by attachments.
However, for many userspace users, such as userpsace users of dma_heap,
they also need to mark the usage of dma-buf, and they don't care about
who attached to this dmabuf, and seems it's no meaning to waitting for
IOCTL:DMA_BUF_SET_NAME rather than mmap.

Signed-off-by: Guangming Cao <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 14 ++------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 511fe0d217a0..afbd0a226639 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -325,10 +325,8 @@ static __poll_t dma_buf_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *poll)
 
 /**
  * dma_buf_set_name - Set a name to a specific dma_buf to track the usage.
- * The name of the dma-buf buffer can only be set when the dma-buf is not
- * attached to any devices. It could theoritically support changing the
- * name of the dma-buf if the same piece of memory is used for multiple
- * purpose between different devices.
+ * It could theoritically support changing the name of the dma-buf if the same
+ * piece of memory is used for multiple purpose between different devices.
  *
  * @dmabuf: [in]     dmabuf buffer that will be renamed.
  * @buf:    [in]     A piece of userspace memory that contains the name of
@@ -346,19 +344,11 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, const char __user *buf)
 	if (IS_ERR(name))
 		return PTR_ERR(name);
 
-	dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
-	if (!list_empty(&dmabuf->attachments)) {
-		ret = -EBUSY;
-		kfree(name);
-		goto out_unlock;
-	}
 	spin_lock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
 	kfree(dmabuf->name);
 	dmabuf->name = name;
 	spin_unlock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
 
-out_unlock:
-	dma_resv_unlock(dmabuf->resv);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
