linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <guangming.cao@mediatek.com>
To: <christian.koenig@amd.com>, <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <guangming.cao@mediatek.com>,
	<linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<rdunlap@infradead.org>, <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
	Guangming Cao <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] dma-buf: remove restriction of IOCTL:DMA_BUF_SET_NAME
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 18:25:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211014102551.54983-1-guangming.cao@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211012084109.176542-1-guangming.cao@mediatek.com>

From: Guangming Cao <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>

In this patch(https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/310349),
it add a new IOCTL to support dma-buf user to set debug name.

But it also added a limitation of this IOCTL, it needs the
attachments of dmabuf should be empty, otherwise it will fail.

For the original series, the idea was that allowing name change
mid-use could confuse the users about the dma-buf.
However, the rest of the series also makes sure each dma-buf have a unique
inode(https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/310387/), and any accounting
should probably use that, without relying on the name as much.

So, removing this restriction will let dma-buf userspace users to use it
more comfortably and without any side effect.

Signed-off-by: Guangming Cao <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 17 +++--------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 511fe0d217a0..5fbb3a2068a3 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -325,10 +325,8 @@ static __poll_t dma_buf_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *poll)
 
 /**
  * dma_buf_set_name - Set a name to a specific dma_buf to track the usage.
- * The name of the dma-buf buffer can only be set when the dma-buf is not
- * attached to any devices. It could theoritically support changing the
- * name of the dma-buf if the same piece of memory is used for multiple
- * purpose between different devices.
+ * It could support changing the name of the dma-buf if the same
+ * piece of memory is used for multiple purpose between different devices.
  *
  * @dmabuf: [in]     dmabuf buffer that will be renamed.
  * @buf:    [in]     A piece of userspace memory that contains the name of
@@ -341,25 +339,16 @@ static __poll_t dma_buf_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *poll)
 static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, const char __user *buf)
 {
 	char *name = strndup_user(buf, DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN);
-	long ret = 0;
 
 	if (IS_ERR(name))
 		return PTR_ERR(name);
 
-	dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
-	if (!list_empty(&dmabuf->attachments)) {
-		ret = -EBUSY;
-		kfree(name);
-		goto out_unlock;
-	}
 	spin_lock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
 	kfree(dmabuf->name);
 	dmabuf->name = name;
 	spin_unlock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
 
-out_unlock:
-	dma_resv_unlock(dmabuf->resv);
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-14 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-09  2:47 [PATCH] dma-buf: remove restriction of IOCTL:DMA_BUF_SET_NAME guangming.cao
2021-10-09  4:41 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-10-09  5:55   ` [PATCH v2] " guangming.cao
2021-10-11  8:20     ` Christian König
2021-10-12  8:41       ` guangming.cao
2021-10-14 10:25         ` guangming.cao [this message]
2021-10-14 10:35           ` [PATCH v3] " guangming.cao
2021-10-26  8:04           ` guangming.cao
2021-10-26 11:18           ` Christian König
2021-10-26 11:52             ` guangming.cao
2021-10-28 11:35               ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211014102551.54983-1-guangming.cao@mediatek.com \
    --to=guangming.cao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).