linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: Avoid live-lock in search_ioctl() on hardware with sub-page faults
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 17:42:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211126164252.GB28560@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211124192024.2408218-4-catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 07:20:24PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Commit a48b73eca4ce ("btrfs: fix potential deadlock in the search
> ioctl") addressed a lockdep warning by pre-faulting the user pages and
> attempting the copy_to_user_nofault() in an infinite loop. On
> architectures like arm64 with MTE, an access may fault within a page at
> a location different from what fault_in_writeable() probed. Since the
> sk_offset is rewound to the previous struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header
> boundary, there is no guaranteed forward progress and search_ioctl() may
> live-lock.
> 
> Use fault_in_exact_writeable() instead which probes the entire user
> buffer for faults at sub-page granularity.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-26 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-24 19:20 [PATCH 0/3] Avoid live-lock in fault-in+uaccess loops with sub-page faults Catalin Marinas
2021-11-24 19:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: Introduce fault_in_exact_writeable() to probe for " Catalin Marinas
2021-11-24 19:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Add support for sub-page faults user probing Catalin Marinas
2021-11-24 19:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: Avoid live-lock in search_ioctl() on hardware with sub-page faults Catalin Marinas
2021-11-24 20:03   ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-11-24 20:37     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-11-25 22:25       ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-11-25 22:42         ` Catalin Marinas
2021-11-26 22:29         ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-11-26 22:57           ` Catalin Marinas
2021-11-27  3:52             ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-11-27 14:33               ` Catalin Marinas
2021-11-27 12:39         ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-11-27 15:21           ` Catalin Marinas
2021-11-27 18:05             ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-11-29 12:16               ` Catalin Marinas
2021-11-29 13:33                 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-11-29 15:36                   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-11-29 18:40                     ` Linus Torvalds
2021-11-29 19:31                       ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-11-29 20:56                       ` Catalin Marinas
2021-11-29 21:53                         ` Linus Torvalds
2021-11-29 23:12                           ` Catalin Marinas
2021-11-29 13:52               ` Catalin Marinas
2021-11-24 23:00     ` Linus Torvalds
2021-11-25 11:10       ` Catalin Marinas
2021-11-25 18:13         ` Linus Torvalds
2021-11-25 20:43           ` Catalin Marinas
2021-11-25 21:02             ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-11-25 21:29               ` Catalin Marinas
2021-11-25 21:40               ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-11-26 16:42   ` David Sterba [this message]
2021-11-24 21:36 ` [PATCH 0/3] Avoid live-lock in fault-in+uaccess loops " Andrew Morton
2021-11-24 22:31   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211126164252.GB28560@suse.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).