From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Keith Packard <keithpac@amazon.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 24/32] ARM: run softirqs on the per-CPU IRQ stack
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 18:47:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220124174744.1054712-25-ardb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220124174744.1054712-1-ardb@kernel.org>
Now that we have enabled IRQ stacks, any softIRQs that are handled over
the back of a hard IRQ will run from the IRQ stack as well. However, any
synchronous softirq processing that happens when re-enabling softIRQs
from task context will still execute on that task's stack.
Since any call to local_bh_enable() at any level in the task's call
stack may trigger a softIRQ processing run, which could potentially
cause a task stack overflow if the combined stack footprints exceed the
stack's size, let's run these synchronous invocations of do_softirq() on
the IRQ stack as well.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Keith Packard <keithpac@amazon.com>
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> # ARMv7M
---
arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 ++
arch/arm/kernel/irq.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 108a7a872084..b959249dd716 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ config ARM
select RTC_LIB
select SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION
select THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
+ select HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK
+ select HAVE_SOFTIRQ_ON_OWN_STACK
select TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT if !CPU_V7M
# Above selects are sorted alphabetically; please add new ones
# according to that. Thanks.
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
index 92ae80a8e5b4..380376f55554 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
@@ -36,11 +36,14 @@
#include <asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h>
#include <asm/hardware/cache-uniphier.h>
#include <asm/outercache.h>
+#include <asm/softirq_stack.h>
#include <asm/exception.h>
#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
#include <asm/mach/irq.h>
#include <asm/mach/time.h>
+#include "reboot.h"
+
unsigned long irq_err_count;
asmlinkage DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u8 *, irq_stack_ptr);
@@ -58,6 +61,17 @@ static void __init init_irq_stacks(void)
}
}
+static void ____do_softirq(void *arg)
+{
+ __do_softirq();
+}
+
+void do_softirq_own_stack(void)
+{
+ call_with_stack(____do_softirq, NULL,
+ __this_cpu_read(irq_stack_ptr));
+}
+
int arch_show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, int prec)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_FIQ
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-24 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-24 17:47 [PATCH v5 00/32] ARM vmap'ed and IRQ stacks roundup Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 01/32] ARM: riscpc: drop support for IOMD_IRQREQC/IOMD_IRQREQD IRQ groups Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 02/32] ARM: riscpc: use GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 03/32] ARM: footbridge: " Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 04/32] ARM: iop32x: offset IRQ numbers by 1 Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 05/32] ARM: iop32x: use GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 06/32] ARM: remove old-style irq entry Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 07/32] irqchip: nvic: Use GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 08/32] ARM: decompressor: disable stack protector Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 09/32] ARM: stackprotector: prefer compiler for TLS based per-task protector Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 10/32] ARM: entry: preserve thread_info pointer in switch_to Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 11/32] ARM: module: implement support for PC-relative group relocations Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 12/32] ARM: assembler: add optimized ldr/str macros to load variables from memory Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 13/32] ARM: percpu: add SMP_ON_UP support Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 14/32] ARM: use TLS register for 'current' on !SMP as well Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 15/32] ARM: smp: defer TPIDRURO update for SMP v6 configurations too Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 16/32] ARM: implement THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK for uniprocessor systems Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 17/32] ARM: assembler: introduce bl_r macro Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 18/32] ARM: unwind: support unwinding across multiple stacks Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 19/32] ARM: export dump_mem() to other objects Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 20/32] ARM: unwind: dump exception stack from calling frame Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 21/32] ARM: backtrace-clang: avoid crash on bogus frame pointer Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 22/32] ARM: implement IRQ stacks Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 23/32] ARM: call_with_stack: add unwind support Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2022-03-22 9:04 ` [PATCH v5 24/32] ARM: run softirqs on the per-CPU IRQ stack Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-22 9:35 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-22 11:29 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 25/32] ARM: memcpy: use frame pointer as unwind anchor Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 26/32] ARM: memmove: " Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 27/32] ARM: memset: clean up unwind annotations Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 28/32] ARM: unwind: disregard unwind info before stack frame is set up Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 29/32] ARM: entry: rework stack realignment code in svc_entry Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 30/32] ARM: switch_to: clean up Thumb2 code path Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 31/32] ARM: mm: prepare vmalloc_seq handling for use under SMP Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 32/32] ARM: implement support for vmap'ed stacks Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-24 17:56 ` [PATCH v5 00/32] ARM vmap'ed and IRQ stacks roundup Russell King (Oracle)
2022-01-24 17:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220124174744.1054712-25-ardb@kernel.org \
--to=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=keithpac@amazon.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mr.bossman075@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).