[PATCH V7 0/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8QM/QXP

[PATCH V7 0/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8QM/QXP

[Peng Fan (OSS)]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

V7:
 patch 3/7: use dev_err, and R-b from Mathieu
 patch 4/7: Add comment when "num_pd <= 1", add R-b from Mathieu
 patch 5/7: Typo has->have, add R-b from Mathieu
 patch 6/7: add detach hook to free the mbox. As wrote in the patch commit log,
          imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init is called both in probe and attach hook to resolve
          mbox defer probe, so there is check in imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init.
	    Moved imx_rproc_free_mbox out from parition notify to detach hook
 patch 7/7: since detach hook moved to patch 6/7, so only enable recovery feature.
             
V6:
 Two changes are made:
1.
 In V5, patch 3 has a wrong logic in imx_rproc_put_scu, see [1], however
 patch 4 fixed the wrong logic, as below:

-	if (!imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id))
-		return;
+	if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id))
+		return imx_rproc_detach_pd(rproc);

 In V6, patch 3 fixed the wrong logic, drop the fix in patch 4. And patch 4
 changed as below, because put scu not has return value.
                imx_rproc_detach_pd(rproc);
                return;

2. Include patch 7/7 to enable attach recovery, because the attach recovery
 feature has been supported in remoteproc core.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-remoteproc/DU0PR04MB941763C3EBF8AE9A9CD69445884C9@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com/T/#m87e2864260d0a1c431b577068ba79e1d64c595f1

V5:
 The patchset could not apply on latest remoteproc for-next branch,
 so rebased. Only patch 6 has a minor conflict, other patches are not
 changed.

V4:
 https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220701104725.557314-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/
 Add R-b from DT maintainer
 Fix probe failure and driver remove path in patch 3, 4
 Add comments about i.MX8QM entries filter in patch 5

V3:
 Drop the dependency in V2.
 Tested on i.MX8QM/8MM
 Use 'fsl,resource-id' and 'fsl,entry-address' Per dt maintainer
 Drop 'reg' property Per remoteproc maintainer
 Drop mcore self recovery, until we land in common framework support.
 https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/cover/20220517064937.4033441-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/

V2:
 https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/cover/20220309102118.8131-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/
 Depends on https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=621311
 Tested on i.MX8QXP/QM/8MP
 Addressed Mathieu's comments
 Drop V1 patch 5/9, patch 3/9 is replaced with upper dependency patchset
 Move V1 patch 4/9 out to https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20220308065754.3355-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/
 Update commit log
 Drop magic number to get entry address from device tree in patch 4/6

The V1 patchset:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20220111033333.403448-4-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/

Peng Fan (7):
  dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8QXP
  dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8QM
  remoteproc: imx_rproc: support attaching to i.MX8QXP M4
  remoteproc: imx_rproc: support kicking Mcore from Linux for i.MX8QXP
  remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8QM
  remoteproc: imx_rproc: request mbox channel later
  remoteproc: imx_rproc: Enable attach recovery for i.MX8QM/QXP

 .../bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml    |  16 +
 drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c                | 285 +++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 295 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.37.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V7 1/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8QXP

[Peng Fan (OSS)]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

Add i.MX8QXP compatible

Add a new property fsl,resource-id for SoC which supports SCFW.
This property is used to check whether remote process is under control
of Linux or not.

Add fsl,entry-address to specify the entry address which used by SCFW
to kick M4.

To i.MX8QM/QXP, when M4 is in the same hardware partition with Cortex-A
cores, need power up M4 through SCFW, then M4 could start. So introduce
power-domains property

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
 .../bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml        | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
index 3a1f59ad79e2..70322e57b6ff 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ properties:
       - fsl,imx8mn-cm7
       - fsl,imx8mp-cm7
       - fsl,imx8mq-cm4
+      - fsl,imx8qxp-cm4
       - fsl,imx8ulp-cm33
       - fsl,imx93-cm33
 
@@ -54,12 +55,26 @@ properties:
     minItems: 1
     maxItems: 32
 
+  power-domains:
+    maxItems: 8
+
   fsl,auto-boot:
     $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
     description:
       Indicate whether need to load the default firmware and start the remote
       processor automatically.
 
+  fsl,entry-address:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
+    description:
+      Specify CPU entry address for SCU enabled processor.
+
+  fsl,resource-id:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
+    description:
+      This property is to specify the resource id of the remote processor in SoC
+      which supports SCFW
+
 required:
   - compatible
 
-- 
2.37.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V7 2/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8QM

[Peng Fan (OSS)]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

Add i.MX8QM compatible

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
index 70322e57b6ff..64e783234e38 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
       - fsl,imx8mp-cm7
       - fsl,imx8mq-cm4
       - fsl,imx8qxp-cm4
+      - fsl,imx8qm-cm4
       - fsl,imx8ulp-cm33
       - fsl,imx93-cm33
 
-- 
2.37.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V7 3/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support attaching to i.MX8QXP M4

[Peng Fan (OSS)]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

When M4 is kicked by SCFW, M4 runs in its own hardware partition, Linux
could only do IPC with M4, it could not start, stop, update image.

We disable recovery reboot when M4 is managed by SCFW, because
remoteproc core still not support M4 auto-recovery without loading
image.

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
index 7cc4fd207e2d..5bbba6955683 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/firmware/imx/sci.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
@@ -59,6 +60,8 @@
 #define IMX_SIP_RPROC_STARTED		0x01
 #define IMX_SIP_RPROC_STOP		0x02
 
+#define IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED	5
+
 /**
  * struct imx_rproc_mem - slim internal memory structure
  * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region
@@ -89,6 +92,10 @@ struct imx_rproc {
 	struct work_struct		rproc_work;
 	struct workqueue_struct		*workqueue;
 	void __iomem			*rsc_table;
+	struct imx_sc_ipc		*ipc_handle;
+	struct notifier_block		rproc_nb;
+	u32				rproc_pt;	/* partition id */
+	u32				rsrc_id;	/* resource id */
 };
 
 static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
@@ -117,6 +124,18 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
 	{ 0xD0000000, 0xa0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
 };
 
+static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp[] = {
+	{ 0x08000000, 0x08000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
+	/* TCML/U */
+	{ 0x1FFE0000, 0x34FE0000, 0x00040000, ATT_OWN | ATT_IOMEM },
+	/* OCRAM(Low 96KB) */
+	{ 0x21000000, 0x00100000, 0x00018000, 0 },
+	/* OCRAM */
+	{ 0x21100000, 0x00100000, 0x00040000, 0 },
+	/* DDR (Data) */
+	{ 0x80000000, 0x80000000, 0x60000000, 0 },
+};
+
 static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8mn[] = {
 	/* dev addr , sys addr  , size	    , flags */
 	/* ITCM   */
@@ -255,6 +274,12 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mq = {
 	.method		= IMX_RPROC_MMIO,
 };
 
+static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx8qxp = {
+	.att		= imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp,
+	.att_size	= ARRAY_SIZE(imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp),
+	.method		= IMX_RPROC_SCU_API,
+};
+
 static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx8ulp = {
 	.att		= imx_rproc_att_imx8ulp,
 	.att_size	= ARRAY_SIZE(imx_rproc_att_imx8ulp),
@@ -680,6 +705,37 @@ static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
 	mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
 }
 
+static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
+	const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg;
+
+	if (dcfg->method != IMX_RPROC_SCU_API)
+		return;
+
+	if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id))
+		return;
+
+	imx_scu_irq_group_enable(IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED, BIT(priv->rproc_pt), false);
+	imx_scu_irq_unregister_notifier(&priv->rproc_nb);
+}
+
+static int imx_rproc_partition_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
+				      unsigned long event, void *group)
+{
+	struct imx_rproc *priv = container_of(nb, struct imx_rproc, rproc_nb);
+
+	/* Ignore other irqs */
+	if (!((event & BIT(priv->rproc_pt)) && (*(u8 *)group == IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED)))
+		return 0;
+
+	rproc_report_crash(priv->rproc, RPROC_WATCHDOG);
+
+	pr_info("Partition%d reset!\n", priv->rproc_pt);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
 {
 	struct regmap_config config = { .name = "imx-rproc" };
@@ -689,6 +745,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
 	struct arm_smccc_res res;
 	int ret;
 	u32 val;
+	u8 pt;
 
 	switch (dcfg->method) {
 	case IMX_RPROC_NONE:
@@ -699,6 +756,51 @@ static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
 		if (res.a0)
 			priv->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
 		return 0;
+	case IMX_RPROC_SCU_API:
+		ret = imx_scu_get_handle(&priv->ipc_handle);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+		ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "fsl,resource-id", &priv->rsrc_id);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev, "No fsl,resource-id property\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * If Mcore resource is not owned by Acore partition, It is kicked by ROM,
+		 * and Linux could only do IPC with Mcore and nothing else.
+		 */
+		if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id))
+			return 0;
+
+		priv->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
+		priv->rproc->recovery_disabled = true;
+
+		/* Get partition id and enable irq in SCFW */
+		ret = imx_sc_rm_get_resource_owner(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id, &pt);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev, "not able to get resource owner\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		priv->rproc_pt = pt;
+		priv->rproc_nb.notifier_call = imx_rproc_partition_notify;
+
+		ret = imx_scu_irq_register_notifier(&priv->rproc_nb);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev, "register scu notifier failed, %d\n", ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		ret = imx_scu_irq_group_enable(IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED, BIT(priv->rproc_pt),
+					       true);
+		if (ret) {
+			imx_scu_irq_unregister_notifier(&priv->rproc_nb);
+			dev_err(dev, "Enable irq failed, %d\n", ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		return 0;
 	default:
 		break;
 	}
@@ -803,7 +905,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	ret = imx_rproc_clk_enable(priv);
 	if (ret)
-		goto err_put_mbox;
+		goto err_put_scu;
 
 	INIT_WORK(&priv->rproc_work, imx_rproc_vq_work);
 
@@ -820,6 +922,8 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 err_put_clk:
 	clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
+err_put_scu:
+	imx_rproc_put_scu(rproc);
 err_put_mbox:
 	imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
 err_put_wkq:
@@ -837,6 +941,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
 	rproc_del(rproc);
+	imx_rproc_put_scu(rproc);
 	imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
 	destroy_workqueue(priv->workqueue);
 	rproc_free(rproc);
@@ -852,6 +957,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id imx_rproc_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-cm4", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mq },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-cm7", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mn },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-cm7", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mn },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8qxp-cm4", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8qxp },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-cm33", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8ulp },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx93-cm33", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx93 },
 	{},
-- 
2.37.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V7 4/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support kicking Mcore from Linux for i.MX8QXP

[Peng Fan (OSS)]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

When M4 is in the same hardware partition with Cortex-A, it
could be start/stop by Linux.

Added power domain to make sure M4 could run, it requires several power
domains to work. Make clk always optional for i.MX8QXP, because
SCFW handles it when power up M4 core.

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
index 5bbba6955683..372cb4a346b0 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
 #include <linux/of_device.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
 #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
@@ -79,6 +80,8 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem {
 #define ATT_OWN		BIT(1)
 #define ATT_IOMEM	BIT(2)
 
+static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc);
+
 struct imx_rproc {
 	struct device			*dev;
 	struct regmap			*regmap;
@@ -96,6 +99,10 @@ struct imx_rproc {
 	struct notifier_block		rproc_nb;
 	u32				rproc_pt;	/* partition id */
 	u32				rsrc_id;	/* resource id */
+	u32				entry;		/* cpu start address */
+	int                             num_pd;
+	struct device                   **pd_dev;
+	struct device_link              **pd_dev_link;
 };
 
 static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
@@ -335,6 +342,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
 		arm_smccc_smc(IMX_SIP_RPROC, IMX_SIP_RPROC_START, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
 		ret = res.a0;
 		break;
+	case IMX_RPROC_SCU_API:
+		ret = imx_sc_pm_cpu_start(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id, true, priv->entry);
+		break;
 	default:
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
@@ -364,6 +374,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
 		if (res.a1)
 			dev_info(dev, "Not in wfi, force stopped\n");
 		break;
+	case IMX_RPROC_SCU_API:
+		ret = imx_sc_pm_cpu_start(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id, false, priv->entry);
+		break;
 	default:
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
@@ -713,8 +726,10 @@ static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc)
 	if (dcfg->method != IMX_RPROC_SCU_API)
 		return;
 
-	if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id))
+	if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id)) {
+		imx_rproc_detach_pd(rproc);
 		return;
+	}
 
 	imx_scu_irq_group_enable(IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED, BIT(priv->rproc_pt), false);
 	imx_scu_irq_unregister_notifier(&priv->rproc_nb);
@@ -736,6 +751,77 @@ static int imx_rproc_partition_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int imx_rproc_attach_pd(struct imx_rproc *priv)
+{
+	struct device *dev = priv->dev;
+	int ret, i;
+
+	/*
+	 * If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework
+	 * will handle it, no need handle it in this driver.
+	 */
+	priv->num_pd = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains",
+						  "#power-domain-cells");
+	if (priv->num_pd <= 1)
+		return 0;
+
+	priv->pd_dev = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!priv->pd_dev)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	priv->pd_dev_link = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev_link),
+					       GFP_KERNEL);
+
+	if (!priv->pd_dev_link)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
+		priv->pd_dev[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(dev, i);
+		if (IS_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i])) {
+			ret = PTR_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i]);
+			goto detach_pd;
+		}
+
+		priv->pd_dev_link[i] = device_link_add(dev, priv->pd_dev[i], DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
+						       DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
+		if (!priv->pd_dev_link[i]) {
+			dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto detach_pd;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+detach_pd:
+	while (--i >= 0) {
+		device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
+		dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
+	int i;
+
+	/*
+	 * If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework
+	 * will handle it, no need handle it in this driver.
+	 */
+	if (priv->num_pd <= 1)
+		return 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
+		device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
+		dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
 {
 	struct regmap_config config = { .name = "imx-rproc" };
@@ -770,8 +856,12 @@ static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
 		 * If Mcore resource is not owned by Acore partition, It is kicked by ROM,
 		 * and Linux could only do IPC with Mcore and nothing else.
 		 */
-		if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id))
-			return 0;
+		if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id)) {
+			if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "fsl,entry-address", &priv->entry))
+				return -EINVAL;
+
+			return imx_rproc_attach_pd(priv);
+		}
 
 		priv->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
 		priv->rproc->recovery_disabled = true;
-- 
2.37.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V7 5/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8QM

[Peng Fan (OSS)]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

Most logic are same as i.MX8QXP, but i.MX8QM has two general purpose
M4 cores, the two cores runs independently and they have different resource
id, different start address from SCFW view.

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
index 372cb4a346b0..917e6db39572 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
  * Copyright (c) 2017 Pengutronix, Oleksij Rempel <kernel@pengutronix.de>
  */
 
+#include <dt-bindings/firmware/imx/rsrc.h>
 #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
@@ -75,10 +76,13 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem {
 	size_t size;
 };
 
-/* att flags */
+/* att flags: lower 16 bits specifying core, higher 16 bits for flags  */
 /* M4 own area. Can be mapped at probe */
-#define ATT_OWN		BIT(1)
-#define ATT_IOMEM	BIT(2)
+#define ATT_OWN         BIT(31)
+#define ATT_IOMEM       BIT(30)
+
+#define ATT_CORE_MASK   0xffff
+#define ATT_CORE(I)     BIT((I))
 
 static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc);
 
@@ -101,6 +105,7 @@ struct imx_rproc {
 	u32				rsrc_id;	/* resource id */
 	u32				entry;		/* cpu start address */
 	int                             num_pd;
+	u32				core_index;
 	struct device                   **pd_dev;
 	struct device_link              **pd_dev_link;
 };
@@ -131,6 +136,19 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
 	{ 0xD0000000, 0xa0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
 };
 
+static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8qm[] = {
+	/* dev addr , sys addr  , size      , flags */
+	{ 0x08000000, 0x08000000, 0x10000000, 0},
+	/* TCML */
+	{ 0x1FFE0000, 0x34FE0000, 0x00020000, ATT_OWN | ATT_IOMEM | ATT_CORE(0)},
+	{ 0x1FFE0000, 0x38FE0000, 0x00020000, ATT_OWN | ATT_IOMEM | ATT_CORE(1)},
+	/* TCMU */
+	{ 0x20000000, 0x35000000, 0x00020000, ATT_OWN | ATT_IOMEM | ATT_CORE(0)},
+	{ 0x20000000, 0x39000000, 0x00020000, ATT_OWN | ATT_IOMEM | ATT_CORE(1)},
+	/* DDR (Data) */
+	{ 0x80000000, 0x80000000, 0x60000000, 0 },
+};
+
 static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp[] = {
 	{ 0x08000000, 0x08000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
 	/* TCML/U */
@@ -281,6 +299,12 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mq = {
 	.method		= IMX_RPROC_MMIO,
 };
 
+static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx8qm = {
+	.att            = imx_rproc_att_imx8qm,
+	.att_size       = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_rproc_att_imx8qm),
+	.method         = IMX_RPROC_SCU_API,
+};
+
 static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx8qxp = {
 	.att		= imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp,
 	.att_size	= ARRAY_SIZE(imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp),
@@ -397,6 +421,17 @@ static int imx_rproc_da_to_sys(struct imx_rproc *priv, u64 da,
 	for (i = 0; i < dcfg->att_size; i++) {
 		const struct imx_rproc_att *att = &dcfg->att[i];
 
+		/*
+		 * Ignore entries not belong to current core:
+		 * i.MX8QM has dual general M4_[0,1] cores, M4_0's own entries
+		 * has "ATT_CORE(0) & BIT(0)" true, M4_1's own entries has
+		 * "ATT_CORE(1) & BIT(1)" true.
+		 */
+		if (att->flags & ATT_CORE_MASK) {
+			if (!((BIT(priv->core_index)) & (att->flags & ATT_CORE_MASK)))
+				continue;
+		}
+
 		if (da >= att->da && da + len < att->da + att->size) {
 			unsigned int offset = da - att->da;
 
@@ -852,6 +887,11 @@ static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
 			return ret;
 		}
 
+		if (priv->rsrc_id == IMX_SC_R_M4_1_PID0)
+			priv->core_index = 1;
+		else
+			priv->core_index = 0;
+
 		/*
 		 * If Mcore resource is not owned by Acore partition, It is kicked by ROM,
 		 * and Linux could only do IPC with Mcore and nothing else.
@@ -1048,6 +1088,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id imx_rproc_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-cm7", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mn },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-cm7", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mn },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8qxp-cm4", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8qxp },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8qm-cm4", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8qm },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-cm33", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8ulp },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx93-cm33", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx93 },
 	{},
-- 
2.37.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V7 6/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: request mbox channel later

[Peng Fan (OSS)]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

It is possible that when remote processor crash, the communication
channel will be broken with garbage value in mailbox, such as
when Linux is issuing a message through mailbox, remote processor
crashes, we need free & rebuild the mailbox channels to make sure
no garbage value in mailbox channels.

So move the request/free to start/stop for managing remote procesosr in
Linux, move to attach/detach for remote processor is out of control of
Linux.

Previous, we just request mbox when attach for CM4 boot early before
Linux, but if mbox defer probe, remoteproc core will do resource cleanup
and corrupt resource table for later probe.

So move request mbox ealier and still keep mbox request when attach
for self recovery case, but keep a check when request/free mbox.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
index 917e6db39572..1183de84a4c0 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem {
 #define ATT_CORE_MASK   0xffff
 #define ATT_CORE(I)     BIT((I))
 
+static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc);
+static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc);
 static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc);
 
 struct imx_rproc {
@@ -357,6 +359,10 @@ static int imx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
 	struct arm_smccc_res res;
 	int ret;
 
+	ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	switch (dcfg->method) {
 	case IMX_RPROC_MMIO:
 		ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, dcfg->src_reg, dcfg->src_mask,
@@ -407,6 +413,8 @@ static int imx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 	if (ret)
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to stop remote core\n");
+	else
+		imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -592,6 +600,22 @@ static void imx_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
 
 static int imx_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
+	return imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc);
+}
+
+static int imx_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
+	const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg;
+
+	if (dcfg->method != IMX_RPROC_SCU_API)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -610,6 +634,7 @@ static struct resource_table *imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc
 static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
 	.prepare	= imx_rproc_prepare,
 	.attach		= imx_rproc_attach,
+	.detach		= imx_rproc_detach,
 	.start		= imx_rproc_start,
 	.stop		= imx_rproc_stop,
 	.kick		= imx_rproc_kick,
@@ -720,6 +745,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc)
 	struct device *dev = priv->dev;
 	struct mbox_client *cl;
 
+	if (priv->tx_ch && priv->rx_ch)
+		return 0;
+
 	if (!of_get_property(dev->of_node, "mbox-names", NULL))
 		return 0;
 
@@ -749,8 +777,15 @@ static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
 
-	mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch);
-	mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
+	if (priv->tx_ch) {
+		mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch);
+		priv->tx_ch = NULL;
+	}
+
+	if (priv->rx_ch) {
+		mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
+		priv->rx_ch = NULL;
+	}
 }
 
 static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc)
-- 
2.37.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V7 7/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Enable attach recovery for i.MX8QM/QXP

[Peng Fan (OSS)]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

i.MX8QM/QXP M4 could recover without help from Linux, so to support it:
 - enable feature RPROC_FEAT_ATTACH_ON_RECOVERY
 - set recovery_disabled as false

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
index 1183de84a4c0..2f82587b6ef9 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -939,7 +939,8 @@ static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
 		}
 
 		priv->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
-		priv->rproc->recovery_disabled = true;
+		priv->rproc->recovery_disabled = false;
+		rproc_set_feature(priv->rproc, RPROC_FEAT_ATTACH_ON_RECOVERY);
 
 		/* Get partition id and enable irq in SCFW */
 		ret = imx_sc_rm_get_resource_owner(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id, &pt);
-- 
2.37.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH V7 6/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: request mbox channel later

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 11:10:36AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> It is possible that when remote processor crash, the communication
> channel will be broken with garbage value in mailbox, such as
> when Linux is issuing a message through mailbox, remote processor
> crashes, we need free & rebuild the mailbox channels to make sure
> no garbage value in mailbox channels.
> 
> So move the request/free to start/stop for managing remote procesosr in
> Linux, move to attach/detach for remote processor is out of control of
> Linux.
> 
> Previous, we just request mbox when attach for CM4 boot early before
> Linux, but if mbox defer probe, remoteproc core will do resource cleanup
> and corrupt resource table for later probe.
> 
> So move request mbox ealier and still keep mbox request when attach
> for self recovery case, but keep a check when request/free mbox.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 917e6db39572..1183de84a4c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem {
>  #define ATT_CORE_MASK   0xffff
>  #define ATT_CORE(I)     BIT((I))
>  
> +static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc);
> +static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc);
>  static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc);
>  
>  struct imx_rproc {
> @@ -357,6 +359,10 @@ static int imx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	struct arm_smccc_res res;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	switch (dcfg->method) {
>  	case IMX_RPROC_MMIO:
>  		ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, dcfg->src_reg, dcfg->src_mask,
> @@ -407,6 +413,8 @@ static int imx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>  
>  	if (ret)
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to stop remote core\n");
> +	else
> +		imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -592,6 +600,22 @@ static void imx_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
>  
>  static int imx_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
>  {
> +	return imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc);
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> +	const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg;
> +
> +	if (dcfg->method != IMX_RPROC_SCU_API)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -610,6 +634,7 @@ static struct resource_table *imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc
>  static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
>  	.prepare	= imx_rproc_prepare,
>  	.attach		= imx_rproc_attach,
> +	.detach		= imx_rproc_detach,
>  	.start		= imx_rproc_start,
>  	.stop		= imx_rproc_stop,
>  	.kick		= imx_rproc_kick,
> @@ -720,6 +745,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	struct device *dev = priv->dev;
>  	struct mbox_client *cl;
>  
> +	if (priv->tx_ch && priv->rx_ch)
> +		return 0;
> +

You did exactly the same things as in V6.  I asked you why this is needed and
all you did is point me to the code in _probe(), which I can read on my own.

Again - why is this needed when we know it will be done in start() and attach()?


>  	if (!of_get_property(dev->of_node, "mbox-names", NULL))
>  		return 0;
>  
> @@ -749,8 +777,15 @@ static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
>  {
>  	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
>  
> -	mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch);
> -	mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
> +	if (priv->tx_ch) {
> +		mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch);
> +		priv->tx_ch = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (priv->rx_ch) {
> +		mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
> +		priv->rx_ch = NULL;
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc)
> -- 
> 2.37.1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH V7 2/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8QM

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 13/10/2022 23:10, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> Add i.MX8QM compatible
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
> index 70322e57b6ff..64e783234e38 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
>        - fsl,imx8mp-cm7
>        - fsl,imx8mq-cm4
>        - fsl,imx8qxp-cm4
> +      - fsl,imx8qm-cm4

Keep alphabetical order.

>  

Best regards,
Krzysztof


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: [PATCH V7 6/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: request mbox channel later

[Peng Fan]

Hi Mathieu,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 6/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: request mbox channel
> later
> 
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 11:10:36AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> >
> > It is possible that when remote processor crash, the communication
> > channel will be broken with garbage value in mailbox, such as when
> > Linux is issuing a message through mailbox, remote processor crashes,
> > we need free & rebuild the mailbox channels to make sure no garbage
> > value in mailbox channels.
> >
> > So move the request/free to start/stop for managing remote procesosr
> > in Linux, move to attach/detach for remote processor is out of control
> > of Linux.
> >
> > Previous, we just request mbox when attach for CM4 boot early before
> > Linux, but if mbox defer probe, remoteproc core will do resource
> > cleanup and corrupt resource table for later probe.
> >
> > So move request mbox ealier and still keep mbox request when attach
> > for self recovery case, but keep a check when request/free mbox.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 39
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index 917e6db39572..1183de84a4c0
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > @@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem {
> >  #define ATT_CORE_MASK   0xffff
> >  #define ATT_CORE(I)     BIT((I))
> >
> > +static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc); static void
> > +imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc);
> >  static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc);
> >
> >  struct imx_rproc {
> > @@ -357,6 +359,10 @@ static int imx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> >  	struct arm_smccc_res res;
> >  	int ret;
> >
> > +	ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> >  	switch (dcfg->method) {
> >  	case IMX_RPROC_MMIO:
> >  		ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, dcfg->src_reg,
> > dcfg->src_mask, @@ -407,6 +413,8 @@ static int imx_rproc_stop(struct
> > rproc *rproc)
> >
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to stop remote core\n");
> > +	else
> > +		imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
> >
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> > @@ -592,6 +600,22 @@ static void imx_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc,
> > int vqid)
> >
> >  static int imx_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)  {
> > +	return imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc); }
> > +
> > +static int imx_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc) {
> > +	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> > +	const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg;
> > +
> > +	if (dcfg->method != IMX_RPROC_SCU_API)
> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > +	if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id))
> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > +	imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
> > +
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -610,6 +634,7 @@ static struct resource_table
> > *imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc  static const struct
> rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
> >  	.prepare	= imx_rproc_prepare,
> >  	.attach		= imx_rproc_attach,
> > +	.detach		= imx_rproc_detach,
> >  	.start		= imx_rproc_start,
> >  	.stop		= imx_rproc_stop,
> >  	.kick		= imx_rproc_kick,
> > @@ -720,6 +745,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc
> *rproc)
> >  	struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> >  	struct mbox_client *cl;
> >
> > +	if (priv->tx_ch && priv->rx_ch)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> 
> You did exactly the same things as in V6.  I asked you why this is needed and
> all you did is point me to the code in _probe(), which I can read on my own.
> 

Sorry for not wrote down clear.

> Again - why is this needed when we know it will be done in start() and
> attach()?

start() and attach() not able to handle mbox defer probe. So I add
the mbox requesting in probe to handle mbox defer probe, and add
a check when requesting mbox channel in start/attach. During first
time attach/start remote core, the imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init just
return, because channel requested in probe flow. 

Since mbox requested in probe, why still add it in start() and attach()?
It is to support runtime stop and start(M4 is under control of Linux),
to support runtime detach(only for i.MX8QM/QXP attach recovery,
m4 out of control from linux) and attach.

Thanks,
Peng.
> 
> 
> >  	if (!of_get_property(dev->of_node, "mbox-names", NULL))
> >  		return 0;
> >
> > @@ -749,8 +777,15 @@ static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc
> > *rproc)  {
> >  	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> >
> > -	mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch);
> > -	mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
> > +	if (priv->tx_ch) {
> > +		mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch);
> > +		priv->tx_ch = NULL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (priv->rx_ch) {
> > +		mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
> > +		priv->rx_ch = NULL;
> > +	}
> >  }
> >
> >  static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc)
> > --
> > 2.37.1
> >

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: [PATCH V7 2/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8QM

[Peng Fan]

> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support
> i.MX8QM
> 
> On 13/10/2022 23:10, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> >
> > Add i.MX8QM compatible
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-
> rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-
> rproc.yaml
> > index 70322e57b6ff..64e783234e38 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-
> rproc.yaml
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
> >        - fsl,imx8mp-cm7
> >        - fsl,imx8mq-cm4
> >        - fsl,imx8qxp-cm4
> > +      - fsl,imx8qm-cm4
> 
> Keep alphabetical order.

Sure. will fix in V8.

Thanks,
Peng.
> 
> >
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH V7 6/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: request mbox channel later

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 03:13:16AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
> 
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 6/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: request mbox channel
> > later
> > 
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 11:10:36AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > >
> > > It is possible that when remote processor crash, the communication
> > > channel will be broken with garbage value in mailbox, such as when
> > > Linux is issuing a message through mailbox, remote processor crashes,
> > > we need free & rebuild the mailbox channels to make sure no garbage
> > > value in mailbox channels.
> > >
> > > So move the request/free to start/stop for managing remote procesosr
> > > in Linux, move to attach/detach for remote processor is out of control
> > > of Linux.
> > >
> > > Previous, we just request mbox when attach for CM4 boot early before
> > > Linux, but if mbox defer probe, remoteproc core will do resource
> > > cleanup and corrupt resource table for later probe.
> > >
> > > So move request mbox ealier and still keep mbox request when attach
> > > for self recovery case, but keep a check when request/free mbox.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 39
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index 917e6db39572..1183de84a4c0
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > @@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem {
> > >  #define ATT_CORE_MASK   0xffff
> > >  #define ATT_CORE(I)     BIT((I))
> > >
> > > +static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc); static void
> > > +imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc);
> > >  static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc);
> > >
> > >  struct imx_rproc {
> > > @@ -357,6 +359,10 @@ static int imx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> > >  	struct arm_smccc_res res;
> > >  	int ret;
> > >
> > > +	ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +
> > >  	switch (dcfg->method) {
> > >  	case IMX_RPROC_MMIO:
> > >  		ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, dcfg->src_reg,
> > > dcfg->src_mask, @@ -407,6 +413,8 @@ static int imx_rproc_stop(struct
> > > rproc *rproc)
> > >
> > >  	if (ret)
> > >  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to stop remote core\n");
> > > +	else
> > > +		imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
> > >
> > >  	return ret;
> > >  }
> > > @@ -592,6 +600,22 @@ static void imx_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc,
> > > int vqid)
> > >
> > >  static int imx_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)  {
> > > +	return imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc); }
> > > +
> > > +static int imx_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc) {
> > > +	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> > > +	const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg;
> > > +
> > > +	if (dcfg->method != IMX_RPROC_SCU_API)
> > > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +
> > > +	if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id))
> > > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +
> > > +	imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
> > > +
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > @@ -610,6 +634,7 @@ static struct resource_table
> > > *imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc  static const struct
> > rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
> > >  	.prepare	= imx_rproc_prepare,
> > >  	.attach		= imx_rproc_attach,
> > > +	.detach		= imx_rproc_detach,
> > >  	.start		= imx_rproc_start,
> > >  	.stop		= imx_rproc_stop,
> > >  	.kick		= imx_rproc_kick,
> > > @@ -720,6 +745,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc
> > *rproc)
> > >  	struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> > >  	struct mbox_client *cl;
> > >
> > > +	if (priv->tx_ch && priv->rx_ch)
> > > +		return 0;
> > > +
> > 
> > You did exactly the same things as in V6.  I asked you why this is needed and
> > all you did is point me to the code in _probe(), which I can read on my own.
> > 
> 
> Sorry for not wrote down clear.
> 
> > Again - why is this needed when we know it will be done in start() and
> > attach()?
> 
> start() and attach() not able to handle mbox defer probe. So I add

We are finally at the heart of the problem.  I had to go look at the
implementation of imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init() to understand that it can return
-EPROBE_DEFER.  Had there been a comment in the code to highlight _why_ the if()
condition is needed, I would have understood right away and all this waste of
time avoided.

> the mbox requesting in probe to handle mbox defer probe, and add
> a check when requesting mbox channel in start/attach. During first
> time attach/start remote core, the imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init just
> return, because channel requested in probe flow. 
> 
> Since mbox requested in probe, why still add it in start() and attach()?
> It is to support runtime stop and start(M4 is under control of Linux),
> to support runtime detach(only for i.MX8QM/QXP attach recovery,
> m4 out of control from linux) and attach.
> 
> Thanks,
> Peng.
> > 
> > 
> > >  	if (!of_get_property(dev->of_node, "mbox-names", NULL))
> > >  		return 0;
> > >
> > > @@ -749,8 +777,15 @@ static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc
> > > *rproc)  {
> > >  	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> > >
> > > -	mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch);
> > > -	mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
> > > +	if (priv->tx_ch) {
> > > +		mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch);
> > > +		priv->tx_ch = NULL;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (priv->rx_ch) {
> > > +		mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
> > > +		priv->rx_ch = NULL;
> > > +	}
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > --
> > > 2.37.1
> > >

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: [PATCH V7 6/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: request mbox channel later

[Peng Fan]

> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 6/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: request mbox channel
> later
> 
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 03:13:16AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Hi Mathieu,
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 6/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: request mbox
> > > channel later
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 11:10:36AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > >
> > > > It is possible that when remote processor crash, the communication
> > > > channel will be broken with garbage value in mailbox, such as when
> > > > Linux is issuing a message through mailbox, remote processor
> > > > crashes, we need free & rebuild the mailbox channels to make sure
> > > > no garbage value in mailbox channels.
> > > >
> > > > So move the request/free to start/stop for managing remote
> > > > procesosr in Linux, move to attach/detach for remote processor is
> > > > out of control of Linux.
> > > >
> > > > Previous, we just request mbox when attach for CM4 boot early
> > > > before Linux, but if mbox defer probe, remoteproc core will do
> > > > resource cleanup and corrupt resource table for later probe.
> > > >
> > > > So move request mbox ealier and still keep mbox request when
> > > > attach for self recovery case, but keep a check when request/free
> mbox.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 39
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index
> 917e6db39572..1183de84a4c0
> > > > 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > > @@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem {
> > > >  #define ATT_CORE_MASK   0xffff
> > > >  #define ATT_CORE(I)     BIT((I))
> > > >
> > > > +static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc); static
> > > > +void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > >  static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > >
> > > >  struct imx_rproc {
> > > > @@ -357,6 +359,10 @@ static int imx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > >  	struct arm_smccc_res res;
> > > >  	int ret;
> > > >
> > > > +	ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc);
> > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > +		return ret;
> > > > +
> > > >  	switch (dcfg->method) {
> > > >  	case IMX_RPROC_MMIO:
> > > >  		ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, dcfg->src_reg,
> > > > dcfg->src_mask, @@ -407,6 +413,8 @@ static int
> > > > dcfg->imx_rproc_stop(struct
> > > > rproc *rproc)
> > > >
> > > >  	if (ret)
> > > >  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to stop remote core\n");
> > > > +	else
> > > > +		imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
> > > >
> > > >  	return ret;
> > > >  }
> > > > @@ -592,6 +600,22 @@ static void imx_rproc_kick(struct rproc
> > > > *rproc, int vqid)
> > > >
> > > >  static int imx_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)  {
> > > > +	return imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc); }
> > > > +
> > > > +static int imx_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc) {
> > > > +	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> > > > +	const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (dcfg->method != IMX_RPROC_SCU_API)
> > > > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id))
> > > > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > +
> > > > +	imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
> > > > +
> > > >  	return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -610,6 +634,7 @@ static struct resource_table
> > > > *imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc  static const
> > > > struct
> > > rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
> > > >  	.prepare	= imx_rproc_prepare,
> > > >  	.attach		= imx_rproc_attach,
> > > > +	.detach		= imx_rproc_detach,
> > > >  	.start		= imx_rproc_start,
> > > >  	.stop		= imx_rproc_stop,
> > > >  	.kick		= imx_rproc_kick,
> > > > @@ -720,6 +745,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct
> > > > rproc
> > > *rproc)
> > > >  	struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> > > >  	struct mbox_client *cl;
> > > >
> > > > +	if (priv->tx_ch && priv->rx_ch)
> > > > +		return 0;
> > > > +
> > >
> > > You did exactly the same things as in V6.  I asked you why this is
> > > needed and all you did is point me to the code in _probe(), which I can
> read on my own.
> > >
> >
> > Sorry for not wrote down clear.
> >
> > > Again - why is this needed when we know it will be done in start()
> > > and attach()?
> >
> > start() and attach() not able to handle mbox defer probe. So I add
> 
> We are finally at the heart of the problem.  I had to go look at the
> implementation of imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init() to understand that it can
> return -EPROBE_DEFER.  Had there been a comment in the code to highlight
> _why_ the if() condition is needed, I would have understood right away and
> all this waste of time avoided.

My bad. I could add comment in V8 if no major comments after you review.
Thanks for your time.

Thanks,
Peng.
> 
> > the mbox requesting in probe to handle mbox defer probe, and add a
> > check when requesting mbox channel in start/attach. During first time
> > attach/start remote core, the imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init just return,
> > because channel requested in probe flow.
> >
> > Since mbox requested in probe, why still add it in start() and attach()?
> > It is to support runtime stop and start(M4 is under control of Linux),
> > to support runtime detach(only for i.MX8QM/QXP attach recovery,
> > m4 out of control from linux) and attach.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Peng.
> > >
> > >
> > > >  	if (!of_get_property(dev->of_node, "mbox-names", NULL))
> > > >  		return 0;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -749,8 +777,15 @@ static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc
> > > > *rproc)  {
> > > >  	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> > > >
> > > > -	mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch);
> > > > -	mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
> > > > +	if (priv->tx_ch) {
> > > > +		mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch);
> > > > +		priv->tx_ch = NULL;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (priv->rx_ch) {
> > > > +		mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
> > > > +		priv->rx_ch = NULL;
> > > > +	}
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > > --
> > > > 2.37.1
> > > >

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel