From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: andreyknvl@google.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_magic
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:29:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <245a3d64-2790-1768-94ab-d1ea56aa3d3d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190813162523.GD10425@arm.com>
Hi
On 13/08/2019 17:25, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 06:02:55PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
>> Added a simple fake_sigreturn testcase which builds a ucontext_t
>
> Add
Ok
>
>> with a bad magic header and place it onto the stack.
>> Expects a SIGSEGV on test PASS.
>> This commit also introduces a common utility assembly function to
>> invoke a sigreturn using a fake provided sigframe.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile | 2 +-
>> .../testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S | 64 +++++++++++++++++++
>> .../arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h | 1 +
>> .../arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore | 1 +
>> .../testcases/fake_sigreturn_bad_magic.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_bad_magic.c
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile
>> index 8c8d08be4b0d..b3dcf315b5a4 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile
>> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ endif
>> # Common test-unit targets to build common-layout test-cases executables
>> # Needs secondary expansion to properly include the testcase c-file in pre-reqs
>> .SECONDEXPANSION:
>> -$(PROGS): test_signals.c test_signals_utils.c testcases/testcases.c $$@.c test_signals.h test_signals_utils.h testcases/testcases.h
>> +$(PROGS): test_signals.c test_signals_utils.c testcases/testcases.c signals.S $$@.c test_signals.h test_signals_utils.h testcases/testcases.h
>> @if [ ! -d $(khdr_dir) ]; then \
>> echo -n "\n!!! WARNING: $(khdr_dir) NOT FOUND."; \
>> echo "===> Are you sure Kernel Headers have been installed properly ?\n"; \
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..6262b877400b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S
>> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
>> +/*
>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> + * Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <asm/unistd.h>
>> +
>> +.section ".rodata", "a"
>
> The section name is not usually quoted in .section (though I guess it
> works).
>
Ok
>> +call_fmt:
>> + .asciz "Calling sigreturn with fake sigframe sized:%zd at calculated SP @%08lX\n"
>> +
>> +.text
>> +
>> +.globl fake_sigreturn
>> +
>> +/* fake_sigreturn x0:&sigframe, x1:sigframe_size, x2:alignment_SP */
>> +fake_sigreturn:
>> + mov x20, x0
>> + mov x21, x1
>> + mov x22, x2
>> + mov x23, sp
>> +
>> + /* create space on the stack for fake sigframe..."x22"-aligned */
>> + mov x0, #0
>
> Why to we move 0 into x0? We clobber x0 again in the next instruction:
Yes unneeded.
>> + add x0, x21, x22
>> + sub x22, x22, #1
>> + bic x0, x0, x22
>> + sub x23, x23, x0
>
> Can you explain the logic here? I'm not sure I understand what this is
> trying to do exactly.
The attempt is to make space on the stack for a x22-bytes-aligned sigframe
of at least x21-bytes-size (assuming x22 is power-of-two):
- calculate the needed aligned space (sigframe_size + x22) & ~(x22 - 1)
- calculate new SP in x23: x3 = sp - needed_aligned_space
- later down... move SP to the calculated sp in x23
- copy the provided sigframe on such new SP
> I notice you further modify this in patch 11 -- see my comments there,
> where I also suggest an alternative way of specifying a misaligned frame
> that might be simpler.
I've seen your comments on patch 11. I think I'll simplify that as you suggested:
patch 11 was meant to add the capability to misalign the sigframe on the SP
(which is needed in testcase contained in 11) but in fact is better if I move all
of the simplified logic here.
>> +
>> + ldr x0, =call_fmt
>> + mov x1, x21
>> + mov x2, x23
>> + bl printf
>> +
>> + mov sp, x23
>> +
>> + /* now fill it with the provided content... */
>> + mov x0, sp
>> + mov x1, x20
>> + mov x2, x21
>> + bl memcpy
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Here saving a last minute SP to current->token acts as a marker:
>> + * if we got here, we are successfully faking a sigreturn; in other
>> + * words we are sure no bad fatal signal has been raised till now
>> + * for unrelated reasons, so we should consider the possibl observed
>
> typo: possible (or possibly?)
>
possibly
>> + * fatal signal like SEGV coming from Kernel restore_sigframe() and
>> + * triggered as expected from our test-case.
>> + * For simplicity this assumes that current field 'token' is laid out
>> + * as first in struct tdescr
>> + */
>> + ldr x0, current
>> + str x23, [x0]
>> + /* SP is already pointing back to the just built fake sigframe here */
>> + mov x8, #__NR_rt_sigreturn
>> + svc #0
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Above sigreturn should not return...looping here leads to a timeout
>> + * and ensure proper and clean test failure, instead of jumping around
>> + * on a potentially corrupted stack.
>> + */
>> + b .
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h
>> index ce35be8ebc8e..2a71da7e6695 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h
>> @@ -12,4 +12,5 @@ int test_run(struct tdescr *td);
>> void test_result(struct tdescr *td);
>>
>> bool get_current_context(struct tdescr *td, ucontext_t *dest_uc);
>> +int fake_sigreturn(void *sigframe, size_t sz, int alignment);
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore
>> index a48a118b1a1a..0ea6fdc3765c 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore
>> @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el1
>> mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el2
>> mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el3
>> mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs
>> +fake_sigreturn_bad_magic
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_bad_magic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_bad_magic.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..b4c063e02a7a
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_bad_magic.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> +/* Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited */
>> +
>
> We should probably also include <signal.h> here, since we're using
> siginfo_t etc.
Yes indeed. It was included via some other headers only.
>
>> +#include <stdio.h>
>> +#include <ucontext.h>
>> +
>> +#include "test_signals_utils.h"
>> +#include "testcases.h"
>> +
>> +struct fake_sigframe sf;
>> +
>> +static int fake_sigreturn_bad_magic_run(struct tdescr *td,
>> + siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc)
>> +{
>> + size_t resv_sz, offset;
>> + struct _aarch64_ctx *shead = GET_SF_RESV_HEAD(sf), *head;
>> +
>> + /* just to fill the ucontext_t with something real */
>> + if (!get_current_context(td, &sf.uc))
>> + return 1;
>> +
>> + resv_sz = GET_SF_RESV_SIZE(sf);
>> + /*
>> + * find the terminator, preserving existing headers
>> + * and verify amount of spare room in __reserved area.
>> + */
>> + head = get_terminator(shead, resv_sz, &offset);
>> + /*
>> + * try stripping extra_context header when low on space:
>> + * we need at least 2*HDR_SZ space ... one for the KSFT_BAD_MAGIC
>> + * and the other for the usual terminator.
>> + */
>> + if (head && resv_sz - offset < HDR_SZ * 2) {
>
> Can we factor out this logic for finding space in the signal frame?
>
> We do pretty much the same thing in all the fake_sigreturn tests...
Ok
>
>> + fprintf(stderr, "Low on space:%zd. Discarding extra_context.\n",
>> + resv_sz - offset);
>> + head = get_header(shead, EXTRA_MAGIC, resv_sz, &offset);
>> + }
>> + /* just give up and timeout if still not enough space */
>
> Do we actually time out? I don't see where we actually wait, so doesn't
> test_run() just fail immediately?
>
> The same applies to all the other fake_sigreturn tests too.
>
Right. It is probably a leftover.
SIGALRM is used as an extreme measure to kill tests gone bad, but this
can happen only once the fake sigframe has been effectively placed on the stack
and sigreturned.
>> + if (head && resv_sz - offset >= HDR_SZ) {
>
> Should this be HDR_SZ * 2 again? We need space for the face header and
> space to write a terminator after it.
I'll fix in the new factored out code.
>
>> + fprintf(stderr, "Mangling template header. Spare space:%zd\n",
>> + resv_sz - offset);
>> + /*
>> + * use a well known NON existent bad magic...something
>> + * we should pretty sure won't be ever defined in Kernel
>> + */
>> + head->magic = KSFT_BAD_MAGIC;
>> + head->size = HDR_SZ;
>> + write_terminator_record(GET_RESV_NEXT_HEAD(head));
>> +
>> + ASSERT_BAD_CONTEXT(&sf.uc);
>> + fake_sigreturn(&sf, sizeof(sf), 16);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 1;
>> +}
>
> [...]
>
> Cheers
> ---Dave
>
Cheers
Cristian
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-30 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-02 17:02 [PATCH v3 00/11] Add arm64/signal initial kselftest support Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] kselftest: arm64: introduce new boilerplate code Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:23 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-27 12:14 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] kselftest: arm64: adds first test and common utils Cristian Marussi
2019-08-06 15:50 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-07 15:42 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-09 10:54 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-09 11:16 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-09 12:20 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-09 12:32 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-12 12:43 ` Amit Kachhap
2019-08-13 13:22 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-14 10:22 ` Amit Kachhap
2019-08-27 14:24 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:24 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-28 17:34 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-03 15:34 ` Dave Martin
2019-09-03 16:08 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_daif_bits Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:24 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-29 10:19 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:24 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-29 11:50 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:25 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-29 15:35 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_magic Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:25 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 14:29 ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2019-09-04 10:05 ` Dave Martin
2019-09-04 10:37 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 10:47 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_size_for_magic0 Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:25 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 14:49 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:26 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 14:55 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:26 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 15:11 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_size Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:26 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 15:21 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_misaligned_sp Cristian Marussi
2019-08-07 16:04 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 15:22 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:27 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 16:33 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] Add arm64/signal initial kselftest support Dave Martin
2019-08-30 16:40 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-02 10:53 ` Dave Martin
2019-09-02 11:30 ` Cristian Marussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=245a3d64-2790-1768-94ab-d1ea56aa3d3d@arm.com \
--to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).