Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64/sparsemem: reduce SECTION_SIZE_BITS

Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64/sparsemem: reduce SECTION_SIZE_BITS

[Christoph Lameter]

On Wed, 20 Jan 2021, Sudarshan Rajagopalan wrote:

> But there are other problems in reducing SECTION_SIZE_BIT. Reducing it by too
> much would over populate /sys/devices/system/memory/ and also consume too many
> page->flags bits in the !vmemmap case. Also section size needs to be multiple
> of 128MB to have PMD based vmemmap mapping with CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES.

There is also the issue of requiring more space in the TLB cache with
smaller page sizes. Or does ARM resolve these into smaller TLB entries
anyways (going on my x86 kwon how here)? Anyways if there are only a few
TLB entries then the effect could
be significant.


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64/sparsemem: reduce SECTION_SIZE_BITS

[Catalin Marinas]

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:08:17AM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2021, Sudarshan Rajagopalan wrote:
> 
> > But there are other problems in reducing SECTION_SIZE_BIT. Reducing it by too
> > much would over populate /sys/devices/system/memory/ and also consume too many
> > page->flags bits in the !vmemmap case. Also section size needs to be multiple
> > of 128MB to have PMD based vmemmap mapping with CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES.
> 
> There is also the issue of requiring more space in the TLB cache with
> smaller page sizes. Or does ARM resolve these into smaller TLB entries
> anyways (going on my x86 kwon how here)? Anyways if there are only a few
> TLB entries then the effect could
> be significant.

There is indeed more TLB pressure with smaller page sizes but this patch
doesn't change this.

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64/sparsemem: reduce SECTION_SIZE_BITS

[Will Deacon]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 09:29:13PM -0800, Sudarshan Rajagopalan wrote:
> memory_block_size_bytes() determines the memory hotplug granularity i.e the
> amount of memory which can be hot added or hot removed from the kernel. The
> generic value here being MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE (1UL << SECTION_SIZE_BITS)
> for memory_block_size_bytes() on platforms like arm64 that does not override.
> 
> Current SECTION_SIZE_BITS is 30 i.e 1GB which is large and a reduction here
> increases memory hotplug granularity, thus improving its agility. A reduced
> section size also reduces memory wastage in vmemmmap mapping for sections
> with large memory holes. So we try to set the least section size as possible.
> 
> A section size bits selection must follow:
> (MAX_ORDER - 1 + PAGE_SHIFT) <= SECTION_SIZE_BITS
> 
> CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER is always defined on arm64 and so just following it
> would help achieve the smallest section size.
> 
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = (CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER - 1 + PAGE_SHIFT)
> 
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 22 (11 - 1 + 12) i.e 4MB   for 4K pages
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 24 (11 - 1 + 14) i.e 16MB  for 16K pages without THP
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 25 (12 - 1 + 14) i.e 32MB  for 16K pages with THP
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 26 (11 - 1 + 16) i.e 64MB  for 64K pages without THP
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 29 (14 - 1 + 16) i.e 512MB for 64K pages with THP
> 
> But there are other problems in reducing SECTION_SIZE_BIT. Reducing it by too
> much would over populate /sys/devices/system/memory/ and also consume too many
> page->flags bits in the !vmemmap case. Also section size needs to be multiple
> of 128MB to have PMD based vmemmap mapping with CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES.
> 
> Given these constraints, lets just reduce the section size to 128MB for 4K
> and 16K base page size configs, and to 512MB for 64K base page size config.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudarshan Rajagopalan <sudaraja@codeaurora.org>
> Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Anshuman -- are you happy with this now?

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64/sparsemem: reduce SECTION_SIZE_BITS

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 1/21/21 7:06 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 09:29:13PM -0800, Sudarshan Rajagopalan wrote:
>> memory_block_size_bytes() determines the memory hotplug granularity i.e the
>> amount of memory which can be hot added or hot removed from the kernel. The
>> generic value here being MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE (1UL << SECTION_SIZE_BITS)
>> for memory_block_size_bytes() on platforms like arm64 that does not override.
>>
>> Current SECTION_SIZE_BITS is 30 i.e 1GB which is large and a reduction here
>> increases memory hotplug granularity, thus improving its agility. A reduced
>> section size also reduces memory wastage in vmemmmap mapping for sections
>> with large memory holes. So we try to set the least section size as possible.
>>
>> A section size bits selection must follow:
>> (MAX_ORDER - 1 + PAGE_SHIFT) <= SECTION_SIZE_BITS
>>
>> CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER is always defined on arm64 and so just following it
>> would help achieve the smallest section size.
>>
>> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = (CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER - 1 + PAGE_SHIFT)
>>
>> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 22 (11 - 1 + 12) i.e 4MB   for 4K pages
>> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 24 (11 - 1 + 14) i.e 16MB  for 16K pages without THP
>> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 25 (12 - 1 + 14) i.e 32MB  for 16K pages with THP
>> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 26 (11 - 1 + 16) i.e 64MB  for 64K pages without THP
>> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 29 (14 - 1 + 16) i.e 512MB for 64K pages with THP
>>
>> But there are other problems in reducing SECTION_SIZE_BIT. Reducing it by too
>> much would over populate /sys/devices/system/memory/ and also consume too many
>> page->flags bits in the !vmemmap case. Also section size needs to be multiple
>> of 128MB to have PMD based vmemmap mapping with CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES.
>>
>> Given these constraints, lets just reduce the section size to 128MB for 4K
>> and 16K base page size configs, and to 512MB for 64K base page size config.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudarshan Rajagopalan <sudaraja@codeaurora.org>
>> Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Anshuman -- are you happy with this now?

Yes.

A small nit. There are couple of extra lines in the patch which
can be dropped, probably while merging.

Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64/sparsemem: reduce SECTION_SIZE_BITS

[David Hildenbrand]

On 21.01.21 06:29, Sudarshan Rajagopalan wrote:
> memory_block_size_bytes() determines the memory hotplug granularity i.e the
> amount of memory which can be hot added or hot removed from the kernel. The
> generic value here being MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE (1UL << SECTION_SIZE_BITS)
> for memory_block_size_bytes() on platforms like arm64 that does not override.
> 
> Current SECTION_SIZE_BITS is 30 i.e 1GB which is large and a reduction here
> increases memory hotplug granularity, thus improving its agility. A reduced
> section size also reduces memory wastage in vmemmmap mapping for sections
> with large memory holes. So we try to set the least section size as possible.
> 
> A section size bits selection must follow:
> (MAX_ORDER - 1 + PAGE_SHIFT) <= SECTION_SIZE_BITS
> 
> CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER is always defined on arm64 and so just following it
> would help achieve the smallest section size.
> 
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = (CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER - 1 + PAGE_SHIFT)
> 
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 22 (11 - 1 + 12) i.e 4MB   for 4K pages
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 24 (11 - 1 + 14) i.e 16MB  for 16K pages without THP
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 25 (12 - 1 + 14) i.e 32MB  for 16K pages with THP
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 26 (11 - 1 + 16) i.e 64MB  for 64K pages without THP
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 29 (14 - 1 + 16) i.e 512MB for 64K pages with THP
> 
> But there are other problems in reducing SECTION_SIZE_BIT. Reducing it by too
> much would over populate /sys/devices/system/memory/ and also consume too many
> page->flags bits in the !vmemmap case. Also section size needs to be multiple
> of 128MB to have PMD based vmemmap mapping with CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES.
> 
> Given these constraints, lets just reduce the section size to 128MB for 4K
> and 16K base page size configs, and to 512MB for 64K base page size config.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudarshan Rajagopalan <sudaraja@codeaurora.org>
> Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h
> index 1f43fcc79738..eb4a75d720ed 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h
> @@ -7,7 +7,26 @@
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
>  #define MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS	CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS
> -#define SECTION_SIZE_BITS	30
> -#endif
> +
> +/*
> + * Section size must be at least 512MB for 64K base
> + * page size config. Otherwise it will be less than
> + * (MAX_ORDER - 1) and the build process will fail.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES
> +#define SECTION_SIZE_BITS 29
> +
> +#else
> +
> +/*
> + * Section size must be at least 128MB for 4K base
> + * page size config. Otherwise PMD based huge page
> + * entries could not be created for vmemmap mappings.
> + * 16K follows 4K for simplicity.
> + */
> +#define SECTION_SIZE_BITS 27
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES */
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM*/
>  
>  #endif
> 

I'm happy to see this change.

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64/sparsemem: reduce SECTION_SIZE_BITS

[Mike Rapoport]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 09:29:13PM -0800, Sudarshan Rajagopalan wrote:
> memory_block_size_bytes() determines the memory hotplug granularity i.e the
> amount of memory which can be hot added or hot removed from the kernel. The
> generic value here being MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE (1UL << SECTION_SIZE_BITS)
> for memory_block_size_bytes() on platforms like arm64 that does not override.
> 
> Current SECTION_SIZE_BITS is 30 i.e 1GB which is large and a reduction here
> increases memory hotplug granularity, thus improving its agility. A reduced
> section size also reduces memory wastage in vmemmmap mapping for sections
> with large memory holes. So we try to set the least section size as possible.
> 
> A section size bits selection must follow:
> (MAX_ORDER - 1 + PAGE_SHIFT) <= SECTION_SIZE_BITS
> 
> CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER is always defined on arm64 and so just following it
> would help achieve the smallest section size.
> 
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = (CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER - 1 + PAGE_SHIFT)
> 
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 22 (11 - 1 + 12) i.e 4MB   for 4K pages
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 24 (11 - 1 + 14) i.e 16MB  for 16K pages without THP
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 25 (12 - 1 + 14) i.e 32MB  for 16K pages with THP
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 26 (11 - 1 + 16) i.e 64MB  for 64K pages without THP
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 29 (14 - 1 + 16) i.e 512MB for 64K pages with THP
> 
> But there are other problems in reducing SECTION_SIZE_BIT. Reducing it by too
> much would over populate /sys/devices/system/memory/ and also consume too many
> page->flags bits in the !vmemmap case. Also section size needs to be multiple
> of 128MB to have PMD based vmemmap mapping with CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES.
> 
> Given these constraints, lets just reduce the section size to 128MB for 4K
> and 16K base page size configs, and to 512MB for 64K base page size config.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudarshan Rajagopalan <sudaraja@codeaurora.org>
> Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>

Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>

BTW, after reduction of the section size maybe arm64 should consider opting
out of freeing unused memory map.

This will make David even more happy as this will allow dropping custom
pfn_valid() ;-)

> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h
> index 1f43fcc79738..eb4a75d720ed 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h
> @@ -7,7 +7,26 @@
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
>  #define MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS	CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS
> -#define SECTION_SIZE_BITS	30
> -#endif
> +
> +/*
> + * Section size must be at least 512MB for 64K base
> + * page size config. Otherwise it will be less than
> + * (MAX_ORDER - 1) and the build process will fail.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES
> +#define SECTION_SIZE_BITS 29
> +
> +#else
> +
> +/*
> + * Section size must be at least 128MB for 4K base
> + * page size config. Otherwise PMD based huge page
> + * entries could not be created for vmemmap mappings.
> + * 16K follows 4K for simplicity.
> + */
> +#define SECTION_SIZE_BITS 27
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES */
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM*/
>  
>  #endif
> -- 
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64/sparsemem: reduce SECTION_SIZE_BITS

[David Hildenbrand]

On 21.01.21 15:16, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 09:29:13PM -0800, Sudarshan Rajagopalan wrote:
>> memory_block_size_bytes() determines the memory hotplug granularity i.e the
>> amount of memory which can be hot added or hot removed from the kernel. The
>> generic value here being MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE (1UL << SECTION_SIZE_BITS)
>> for memory_block_size_bytes() on platforms like arm64 that does not override.
>>
>> Current SECTION_SIZE_BITS is 30 i.e 1GB which is large and a reduction here
>> increases memory hotplug granularity, thus improving its agility. A reduced
>> section size also reduces memory wastage in vmemmmap mapping for sections
>> with large memory holes. So we try to set the least section size as possible.
>>
>> A section size bits selection must follow:
>> (MAX_ORDER - 1 + PAGE_SHIFT) <= SECTION_SIZE_BITS
>>
>> CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER is always defined on arm64 and so just following it
>> would help achieve the smallest section size.
>>
>> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = (CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER - 1 + PAGE_SHIFT)
>>
>> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 22 (11 - 1 + 12) i.e 4MB   for 4K pages
>> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 24 (11 - 1 + 14) i.e 16MB  for 16K pages without THP
>> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 25 (12 - 1 + 14) i.e 32MB  for 16K pages with THP
>> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 26 (11 - 1 + 16) i.e 64MB  for 64K pages without THP
>> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 29 (14 - 1 + 16) i.e 512MB for 64K pages with THP
>>
>> But there are other problems in reducing SECTION_SIZE_BIT. Reducing it by too
>> much would over populate /sys/devices/system/memory/ and also consume too many
>> page->flags bits in the !vmemmap case. Also section size needs to be multiple
>> of 128MB to have PMD based vmemmap mapping with CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES.
>>
>> Given these constraints, lets just reduce the section size to 128MB for 4K
>> and 16K base page size configs, and to 512MB for 64K base page size config.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudarshan Rajagopalan <sudaraja@codeaurora.org>
>> Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> BTW, after reduction of the section size maybe arm64 should consider opting
> out of freeing unused memory map.
> 
> This will make David even more happy as this will allow dropping custom
> pfn_valid() ;-)

Mike knows my wildest dreams ;)

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64/sparsemem: reduce SECTION_SIZE_BITS

[Catalin Marinas]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 09:29:13PM -0800, Sudarshan Rajagopalan wrote:
> memory_block_size_bytes() determines the memory hotplug granularity i.e the
> amount of memory which can be hot added or hot removed from the kernel. The
> generic value here being MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE (1UL << SECTION_SIZE_BITS)
> for memory_block_size_bytes() on platforms like arm64 that does not override.
> 
> Current SECTION_SIZE_BITS is 30 i.e 1GB which is large and a reduction here
> increases memory hotplug granularity, thus improving its agility. A reduced
> section size also reduces memory wastage in vmemmmap mapping for sections
> with large memory holes. So we try to set the least section size as possible.
> 
> A section size bits selection must follow:
> (MAX_ORDER - 1 + PAGE_SHIFT) <= SECTION_SIZE_BITS
> 
> CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER is always defined on arm64 and so just following it
> would help achieve the smallest section size.
> 
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = (CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER - 1 + PAGE_SHIFT)
> 
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 22 (11 - 1 + 12) i.e 4MB   for 4K pages
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 24 (11 - 1 + 14) i.e 16MB  for 16K pages without THP
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 25 (12 - 1 + 14) i.e 32MB  for 16K pages with THP
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 26 (11 - 1 + 16) i.e 64MB  for 64K pages without THP
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 29 (14 - 1 + 16) i.e 512MB for 64K pages with THP
> 
> But there are other problems in reducing SECTION_SIZE_BIT. Reducing it by too
> much would over populate /sys/devices/system/memory/ and also consume too many
> page->flags bits in the !vmemmap case. Also section size needs to be multiple
> of 128MB to have PMD based vmemmap mapping with CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES.
> 
> Given these constraints, lets just reduce the section size to 128MB for 4K
> and 16K base page size configs, and to 512MB for 64K base page size config.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudarshan Rajagopalan <sudaraja@codeaurora.org>
> Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/1] arm64/sparsemem: reduce SECTION_SIZE_BITS

[Will Deacon]

On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:29:12 -0800, Sudarshan Rajagopalan wrote:
> This patch is the follow-up from the discussions in the thread [1].
> Reducing the section size has the merit of reducing wastage of reserved memory
> for vmmemmap mappings for sections with large memory holes. Also with smaller
> section size gives more grunularity and agility for memory hot(un)plugging.
> 
> But there are also constraints in reducing SECTION_SIZE_BIT:
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks!

[1/1] arm64/sparsemem: reduce SECTION_SIZE_BITS
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/f0b13ee23241

Cheers,
-- 
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/1] arm64/sparsemem: reduce SECTION_SIZE_BITS

[Pavel Tatashin]

On 1/21/21 1:26 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:29:12 -0800, Sudarshan Rajagopalan wrote:
>> This patch is the follow-up from the discussions in the thread [1].
>> Reducing the section size has the merit of reducing wastage of reserved memory
>> for vmmemmap mappings for sections with large memory holes. Also with smaller
>> section size gives more grunularity and agility for memory hot(un)plugging.
>>
>> But there are also constraints in reducing SECTION_SIZE_BIT:
>>
>> [...]
> 
> Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks!

We have been using 128M for 4K pages for a while, using patch [1] without issues.

One thing that needs to be also modified is makedumpfile [2]- line 76, must update it SECTIONS_SIZE_BITS based on the PAGESIZE.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190423203843.2898-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com/
[2] https://sourceforge.net/p/makedumpfile/code/ci/master/tree/arch/arm64.c


> 
> [1/1] arm64/sparsemem: reduce SECTION_SIZE_BITS
>       https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/f0b13ee23241
> 
> Cheers,
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel