[Patch v4 0/3] Add new compatible for Exynos3250

[Patch v4 0/3] Add new compatible for Exynos3250

[Aakarsh Jain]

Since MFC v7 support was added for Exynos5420 and Exynos3250
SoC with same compatible string "samsung,mfc-v7". As both SoCs
having different hardware properties and having same compatible
string for both SoCs doesn't seems to be correct.
Add a new compatible to differentiate the two SoC's MFC IP,
at the same time to keep git bisect happy, add a fallback to mfc-v7
for Exynos3250.

Changes since v3:
 - Addressed review comments from Krzysztof Kozlowski.
   - Added new compatible string for Exynos3250 followed by mfc-v7 fallback.

Changes since v2:
 - Addressed review comments from Krzysztof Kozlowski.
   - Changed subject prefixes matching the subsystem.

Changes since v1:
 - Addressed review comments from Marek Szyprowski.
   - Changed subject prefix from arm64 to arm.

 - Addressed review comments from Krzysztof Kozlowski.
   - Changed subject prefixes matching the subsystem.
   - Added new compatible string for Exynos3250 followed by mfc-v7 fallback.
   - Removed checkpatch warnings from s5p_mfc.c.Sent separate patch
     series for the same.
   
 - Addressed review comments from Tommaso Merciai.
   - Change in commit message body from used to use in Patch-2.

Aakarsh Jain (3):
  media: dt-bindings: s5p-mfc: Add new compatible string for Exynos3250
    SoC
  media: s5p-mfc: Add variant data for MFC v7 hardware for Exynos 3250
    SoC
  ARM: dts: exynos: Add new SoC specific compatible string for
    Exynos3250 SoC

 .../devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt       | 10 ++++++----
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi               |  2 +-
 .../media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c    | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[Patch v4 1/3] media: dt-bindings: s5p-mfc: Add new compatible string for Exynos3250 SoC

[Aakarsh Jain]

Since MFC v7 support was present for both Exynos5420 and Exynos3250
SoC with same compatible string "samsung,mfc-v7". As both SoCs
having different hardware properties and having same compatible
string for both SoCs doesn't seems to be correct.
Add new compatible for Exynos3250 SoC followed by mfc-v7 fallback
which will differentiate the node properties for both SoCs which 
support MFC v7.

Reviewed-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com>
Suggested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@samsung.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

We are already in process of converting this txt file to yaml.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/20221011122516.32135-2-aakarsh.jain@samsung.com/
Modifying this txt binding for completeness.

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt
index aa54c8159d9f..9b13e8c9d040 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt
@@ -10,10 +10,12 @@ Required properties:
   - compatible : value should be either one among the following
 	(a) "samsung,mfc-v5" for MFC v5 present in Exynos4 SoCs
 	(b) "samsung,mfc-v6" for MFC v6 present in Exynos5 SoCs
-	(c) "samsung,mfc-v7" for MFC v7 present in Exynos5420 SoC
-	(d) "samsung,mfc-v8" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5800 SoC
-	(e) "samsung,exynos5433-mfc" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5433 SoC
-	(f) "samsung,mfc-v10" for MFC v10 present in Exynos7880 SoC
+	(c) "samsung,exynos3250-mfc","samsung,mfc-v7" for MFC v7
+	     present in Exynos3250 SoC
+	(d) "samsung,mfc-v7" for MFC v7 present in Exynos5420 SoC
+	(e) "samsung,mfc-v8" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5800 SoC
+	(f) "samsung,exynos5433-mfc" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5433 SoC
+	(g) "samsung,mfc-v10" for MFC v10 present in Exynos7880 SoC
 
   - reg : Physical base address of the IP registers and length of memory
 	  mapped region.
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[Patch v4 2/3] media: s5p-mfc: Add variant data for MFC v7 hardware for Exynos 3250 SoC

[Aakarsh Jain]

commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for
Exynos3250 and use the same compatible string as used by
Exynos5240 but both the IPs are a bit different in terms of
IP clock.
Lets add variant driver data based on the new compatible string
"samsung,exynos3250-mfc" for Exynos3250 SoC.

Suggested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Fixes: 5441e9dafdfc ("[media] s5p-mfc: Core support for MFC v7")
Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@samsung.com>
---
 .../media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c    | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c b/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
index fca5c6405eec..007c7dbee037 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
@@ -1576,8 +1576,18 @@ static struct s5p_mfc_variant mfc_drvdata_v7 = {
 	.port_num	= MFC_NUM_PORTS_V7,
 	.buf_size	= &buf_size_v7,
 	.fw_name[0]     = "s5p-mfc-v7.fw",
-	.clk_names	= {"mfc", "sclk_mfc"},
-	.num_clocks	= 2,
+	.clk_names	= {"mfc"},
+	.num_clocks	= 1,
+};
+
+static struct s5p_mfc_variant mfc_drvdata_v7_3250 = {
+	.version        = MFC_VERSION_V7,
+	.version_bit    = MFC_V7_BIT,
+	.port_num       = MFC_NUM_PORTS_V7,
+	.buf_size       = &buf_size_v7,
+	.fw_name[0]     = "s5p-mfc-v7.fw",
+	.clk_names      = {"mfc", "sclk_mfc"},
+	.num_clocks     = 2,
 };
 
 static struct s5p_mfc_buf_size_v6 mfc_buf_size_v8 = {
@@ -1647,6 +1657,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos_mfc_match[] = {
 	}, {
 		.compatible = "samsung,mfc-v7",
 		.data = &mfc_drvdata_v7,
+	}, {
+		.compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-mfc",
+		.data = &mfc_drvdata_v7_3250,
 	}, {
 		.compatible = "samsung,mfc-v8",
 		.data = &mfc_drvdata_v8,
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[Patch v4 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos: Add new SoC specific compatible string for Exynos3250 SoC

[Aakarsh Jain]

commit "752d3a23d1f68de87e3c" which adds MFC codec device node
for exynos3250 SoC. Since exynos3250.dtsi and exynos5420.dtsi are
using same compatible string as "samsung,mfc-v7" but their node
properties are different. As both SoCs have MFC v7 hardware module
but with different clock hierarchy and complexity.
Add new compatible string followed by mfc-v7 fallback for Exynos3250
SoC.

Reviewed-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com>
Suggested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
index 326b9e0ed8d3..1a29993fca0b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@
 		};
 
 		mfc: codec@13400000 {
-			compatible = "samsung,mfc-v7";
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-mfc","samsung,mfc-v7";
 			reg = <0x13400000 0x10000>;
 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 102 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 			clock-names = "mfc", "sclk_mfc";
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [Patch v4 1/3] media: dt-bindings: s5p-mfc: Add new compatible string for Exynos3250 SoC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 14/11/2022 06:46, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
> Since MFC v7 support was present for both Exynos5420 and Exynos3250
> SoC with same compatible string "samsung,mfc-v7". As both SoCs
> having different hardware properties and having same compatible
> string for both SoCs doesn't seems to be correct.
> Add new compatible for Exynos3250 SoC followed by mfc-v7 fallback
> which will differentiate the node properties for both SoCs which 
> support MFC v7.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com>
> Suggested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@samsung.com>

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [Patch v4 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos: Add new SoC specific compatible string for Exynos3250 SoC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 14/11/2022 06:46, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
> commit "752d3a23d1f68de87e3c" which adds MFC codec device node

Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings.

> for exynos3250 SoC. Since exynos3250.dtsi and exynos5420.dtsi are
> using same compatible string as "samsung,mfc-v7" but their node
> properties are different. As both SoCs have MFC v7 hardware module
> but with different clock hierarchy and complexity.
> Add new compatible string followed by mfc-v7 fallback for Exynos3250
> SoC.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com>
> Suggested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@samsung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> index 326b9e0ed8d3..1a29993fca0b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@
>  		};
>  
>  		mfc: codec@13400000 {
> -			compatible = "samsung,mfc-v7";
> +			compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-mfc","samsung,mfc-v7";

Missing space.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [Patch v4 2/3] media: s5p-mfc: Add variant data for MFC v7 hardware for Exynos 3250 SoC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 14/11/2022 06:46, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
> commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for

Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings.

> Exynos3250 and use the same compatible string as used by
> Exynos5240 but both the IPs are a bit different in terms of
> IP clock.
> Lets add variant driver data based on the new compatible string

Just "Add variant"

Best regards,
Krzysztof


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: [Patch v4 2/3] media: s5p-mfc: Add variant data for MFC v7 hardware for Exynos 3250 SoC

[Aakarsh Jain]

Hi Krzysztof,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org]
> Sent: 14 November 2022 13:22
> To: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@samsung.com>; linux-arm-
> kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: m.szyprowski@samsung.com; andrzej.hajda@intel.com;
> mchehab@kernel.org; hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl;
> ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar; jernej.skrabec@gmail.com;
> benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org;
> stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org; dillon.minfei@gmail.com;
> david.plowman@raspberrypi.com; mark.rutland@arm.com;
> robh+dt@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org; andi@etezian.org;
> alim.akhtar@samsung.com; aswani.reddy@samsung.com;
> pankaj.dubey@samsung.com; smitha.t@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [Patch v4 2/3] media: s5p-mfc: Add variant data for MFC v7
> hardware for Exynos 3250 SoC
> 
> On 14/11/2022 06:46, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
> > commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for
> 
> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings.
> 
Do you mean warnings on "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" commit? Or on this patch?
 
I am running like this :  ./scripts/checkpatch.pl patch_file, it does not show any warnings.

or am I missing anything while running checkpatch on the current patch?

> > Exynos3250 and use the same compatible string as used by
> > Exynos5240 but both the IPs are a bit different in terms of IP clock.
> > Lets add variant driver data based on the new compatible string
> 
> Just "Add variant"
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [Patch v4 2/3] media: s5p-mfc: Add variant data for MFC v7 hardware for Exynos 3250 SoC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 14/11/2022 10:44, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org]
>> Sent: 14 November 2022 13:22
>> To: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@samsung.com>; linux-arm-
>> kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: m.szyprowski@samsung.com; andrzej.hajda@intel.com;
>> mchehab@kernel.org; hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl;
>> ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar; jernej.skrabec@gmail.com;
>> benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org;
>> stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org; dillon.minfei@gmail.com;
>> david.plowman@raspberrypi.com; mark.rutland@arm.com;
>> robh+dt@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org; andi@etezian.org;
>> alim.akhtar@samsung.com; aswani.reddy@samsung.com;
>> pankaj.dubey@samsung.com; smitha.t@samsung.com
>> Subject: Re: [Patch v4 2/3] media: s5p-mfc: Add variant data for MFC v7
>> hardware for Exynos 3250 SoC
>>
>> On 14/11/2022 06:46, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
>>> commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for
>>
>> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings.
>>
> Do you mean warnings on "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" commit? Or on this patch?
>  
> I am running like this :  ./scripts/checkpatch.pl patch_file, it does not show any warnings.
> 
> or am I missing anything while running checkpatch on the current patch?

Eh, you're right... checkpatch does not catch it. You need to fix syntax
- drop quotes, use proper commit title:

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19-rc1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L100

Best regards,
Krzysztof


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel