[PATCH] ARM: vfp: Silence mvfr0 unused variable warning

[PATCH] ARM: vfp: Silence mvfr0 unused variable warning

[Stephen Boyd]

Stephen Rothwell reports that commit 3f4c9f8f0a20 ("ARM: 8197/1:
vfp: Fix VFPv3 hwcap detection on CPUID based cpus") introduced an
unused variable warning.

arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c: In function 'vfp_init':
arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c:725:6: warning: unused variable 'mvfr0'
[-Wunused-variable]
  u32 mvfr0;

Silence this warning by using IS_ENABLED instead of ifdefs.

Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---

If you apply and use git show -b you can see that most of the diff
is indentation.

 arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
index 5002d002f6e3..216cd78f64aa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
+++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
@@ -752,30 +752,30 @@ static int __init vfp_init(void)
 		 * precision floating point operations. Only check
 		 * for NEON if the hardware has the MVFR registers.
 		 */
-#ifdef CONFIG_NEON
-		if ((fmrx(MVFR1) & 0x000fff00) == 0x00011100)
+		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NEON) &&
+		   (fmrx(MVFR1) & 0x000fff00) == 0x00011100)
 			elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_NEON;
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_VFPv3
-		mvfr0 = fmrx(MVFR0);
-		if (((mvfr0 & MVFR0_DP_MASK) >> MVFR0_DP_BIT) == 0x2 ||
-		    ((mvfr0 & MVFR0_SP_MASK) >> MVFR0_SP_BIT) == 0x2) {
-			elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_VFPv3;
-			/*
-			 * Check for VFPv3 D16 and VFPv4 D16.  CPUs in
-			 * this configuration only have 16 x 64bit
-			 * registers.
-			 */
-			if ((mvfr0 & MVFR0_A_SIMD_MASK) == 1)
-				/* also v4-D16 */
-				elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_VFPv3D16;
-			else
-				elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_VFPD32;
-		}
 
-		if ((fmrx(MVFR1) & 0xf0000000) == 0x10000000)
-			elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_VFPv4;
-#endif
+		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFPv3)) {
+			mvfr0 = fmrx(MVFR0);
+			if (((mvfr0 & MVFR0_DP_MASK) >> MVFR0_DP_BIT) == 0x2 ||
+			    ((mvfr0 & MVFR0_SP_MASK) >> MVFR0_SP_BIT) == 0x2) {
+				elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_VFPv3;
+				/*
+				 * Check for VFPv3 D16 and VFPv4 D16.  CPUs in
+				 * this configuration only have 16 x 64bit
+				 * registers.
+				 */
+				if ((mvfr0 & MVFR0_A_SIMD_MASK) == 1)
+					/* also v4-D16 */
+					elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_VFPv3D16;
+				else
+					elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_VFPD32;
+			}
+
+			if ((fmrx(MVFR1) & 0xf0000000) == 0x10000000)
+				elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_VFPv4;
+		}
 	/* Extract the architecture version on pre-cpuid scheme */
 	} else {
 		if (vfpsid & FPSID_NODOUBLE) {
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[PATCH] ARM: vfp: Silence mvfr0 unused variable warning

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Stephen,

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:56:31 -0800 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell reports that commit 3f4c9f8f0a20 ("ARM: 8197/1:
> vfp: Fix VFPv3 hwcap detection on CPUID based cpus") introduced an
> unused variable warning.
> 
> arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c: In function 'vfp_init':
> arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c:725:6: warning: unused variable 'mvfr0'
> [-Wunused-variable]
>   u32 mvfr0;
> 
> Silence this warning by using IS_ENABLED instead of ifdefs.
> 
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>

Looks good (though I haven't tested it).  One small nit below:

> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFPv3)) {
> +			mvfr0 = fmrx(MVFR0);

Now that you have a block here, you could move the declaration of mvfr0
into this block, right?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr at canb.auug.org.au
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141119/6805172a/attachment-0001.sig>

[PATCH] ARM: vfp: Silence mvfr0 unused variable warning

[Stephen Boyd]

On 11/18/2014 01:14 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> One small nit below:
>> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFPv3)) {
>> +			mvfr0 = fmrx(MVFR0);
> Now that you have a block here, you could move the declaration of mvfr0
> into this block, right?
>

Sure I can squash in that change.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project