linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.9.0 (arm-next)
@ 2020-10-16  3:48 CKI Project
  2020-10-16  8:21 ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: CKI Project @ 2020-10-16  3:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: will, catalin.marinas, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Jeff Bastian, Rachel Sibley, Memory Management, Jan Stancek


Hello,

We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:

       Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
            Commit: 51d96ff83ed7 - Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci

The results of these automated tests are provided below.

    Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
             Merge: OK
           Compile: OK
             Tests: FAILED

All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:

  https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2020/10/15/615400

One or more kernel tests failed:

    aarch64:
     ❌ stress: stress-ng
     ❌ LTP

We hope that these logs can help you find the problem quickly. For the full
detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of this message.

Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.

        ,-.   ,-.
       ( C ) ( K )  Continuous
        `-',-.`-'   Kernel
          ( I )     Integration
           `-'
______________________________________________________________________________

Compile testing
---------------

We compiled the kernel for 1 architecture:

    aarch64:
      make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg



Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:

  aarch64:
    Host 1:
       ✅ Boot test
       ✅ xfstests - ext4
       ✅ xfstests - xfs
       ✅ selinux-policy: serge-testsuite
       ✅ storage: software RAID testing
       ❌ stress: stress-ng
       🚧 ✅ xfstests - btrfs
       🚧 ❌ IPMI driver test
       🚧 ✅ IPMItool loop stress test
       🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
       🚧 ✅ Storage nvme - tcp

    Host 2:
       ✅ Boot test
       ✅ ACPI table test
       ✅ ACPI enabled test
       ✅ Podman system integration test - as root
       ✅ Podman system integration test - as user
       ❌ LTP
       ✅ Loopdev Sanity
       ✅ Memory: fork_mem
       ✅ Memory function: memfd_create
       ✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
       ✅ Networking bridge: sanity
       ✅ Networking socket: fuzz
       ✅ Networking: igmp conformance test
       ✅ Networking route: pmtu
       ✅ Networking route_func - local
       ✅ Networking route_func - forward
       ✅ Networking TCP: keepalive test
       ✅ Networking UDP: socket
       ✅ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
       ✅ Networking tunnel: gre basic
       ✅ L2TP basic test
       ✅ Networking tunnel: vxlan basic
       ✅ Networking ipsec: basic netns - transport
       ✅ Networking ipsec: basic netns - tunnel
       ✅ Libkcapi AF_ALG test
       ✅ pciutils: update pci ids test
       ✅ ALSA PCM loopback test
       ✅ ALSA Control (mixer) Userspace Element test
       ✅ storage: SCSI VPD
       🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
       🚧 ✅ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
       🚧 ✅ Firmware test suite
       🚧 ✅ jvm - jcstress tests
       🚧 ✅ Memory function: kaslr
       🚧 ✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
       🚧 ✅ Networking firewall: basic netfilter test
       🚧 ✅ audit: audit testsuite test
       🚧 ✅ trace: ftrace/tracer
       🚧 ✅ kdump - kexec_boot

  Test sources: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-tests
    💚 Pull requests are welcome for new tests or improvements to existing tests!

Aborted tests
-------------
Tests that didn't complete running successfully are marked with ⚡⚡⚡.
If this was caused by an infrastructure issue, we try to mark that
explicitly in the report.

Waived tests
------------
If the test run included waived tests, they are marked with 🚧. Such tests are
executed but their results are not taken into account. Tests are waived when
their results are not reliable enough, e.g. when they're just introduced or are
being fixed.

Testing timeout
---------------
We aim to provide a report within reasonable timeframe. Tests that haven't
finished running yet are marked with ⏱.


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.9.0 (arm-next)
  2020-10-16  3:48 ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.9.0 (arm-next) CKI Project
@ 2020-10-16  8:21 ` Will Deacon
  2020-10-19  8:27   ` Veronika Kabatova
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2020-10-16  8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: CKI Project
  Cc: Rachel Sibley, catalin.marinas, Memory Management, Jeff Bastian,
	Jan Stancek, linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:48:13AM -0000, CKI Project wrote:
> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
> 
>        Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
>             Commit: 51d96ff83ed7 - Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
> 
> The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> 
>     Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
>              Merge: OK
>            Compile: OK
>              Tests: FAILED
> 
> All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
> 
>   https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2020/10/15/615400
> 
> One or more kernel tests failed:
> 
>     aarch64:
>      ❌ stress: stress-ng

There's an interested WARN from the scheduler in the stress-ng run, but the
failures look more like they're related to the infrastructure because all of
the invocations seem to be saying "(Expected 0,2,3, got 0)".

>      ❌ LTP

This looks like a broken setup:

     7	RTNETLINK answers: Operation not permitted
     8	netns_breakns_ns_exec_ipv4_ioctl 1 TBROK: unable to create veth pair devices

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.9.0 (arm-next)
  2020-10-16  8:21 ` Will Deacon
@ 2020-10-19  8:27   ` Veronika Kabatova
  2020-10-19 10:29     ` Veronika Kabatova
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Veronika Kabatova @ 2020-10-19  8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon
  Cc: catalin marinas, Memory Management, Jeff Bastian, CKI Project,
	Jan Stancek, linux-arm-kernel



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>
> To: "CKI Project" <cki-project@redhat.com>
> Cc: "catalin marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "Memory Management" <mm-qe@redhat.com>, "Jeff Bastian"
> <jbastian@redhat.com>, "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 10:21:05 AM
> Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel	5.9.0 (arm-next)
> 
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:48:13AM -0000, CKI Project wrote:
> > We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
> > 
> >        Kernel repo:
> >        https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> >             Commit: 51d96ff83ed7 - Merge branch 'for-next/core' into
> >             for-kernelci
> > 
> > The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> > 
> >     Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
> >              Merge: OK
> >            Compile: OK
> >              Tests: FAILED
> > 
> > All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download
> > here:
> > 
> >   https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2020/10/15/615400
> > 
> > One or more kernel tests failed:
> > 
> >     aarch64:
> >      ❌ stress: stress-ng
> 
> There's an interested WARN from the scheduler in the stress-ng run, but the
> failures look more like they're related to the infrastructure because all of
> the invocations seem to be saying "(Expected 0,2,3, got 0)".
> 

Hi,

I see a test timeout because it took too long which I don't think is
related to kernel (we've already submitted a bug to the test framework
to allow proper detection of it but it wasn't fixed yet, sorry!).

However, we're also hunting down a bug in mm/usercopy which is triggered
by stress-ng which we've seen so far on block and mainline, and the
subtest that triggers it wasn't ran due to the timeout. I resubmitted
the test job to check if your tree is affected as well and will let you
know if we see the panic.


Veronika

> >      ❌ LTP
> 
> This looks like a broken setup:
> 
>      7	RTNETLINK answers: Operation not permitted
>      8	netns_breakns_ns_exec_ipv4_ioctl 1 TBROK: unable to create veth pair
>      devices
> 
> Will
> 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.9.0 (arm-next)
  2020-10-19  8:27   ` Veronika Kabatova
@ 2020-10-19 10:29     ` Veronika Kabatova
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Veronika Kabatova @ 2020-10-19 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon
  Cc: catalin marinas, Memory Management, Jeff Bastian, CKI Project,
	Jan Stancek, linux-arm-kernel



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Veronika Kabatova" <vkabatov@redhat.com>
> To: "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: "catalin marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "Memory Management" <mm-qe@redhat.com>, "Jeff Bastian"
> <jbastian@redhat.com>, "CKI Project" <cki-project@redhat.com>, "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>,
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 10:27:17 AM
> Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel	5.9.0 (arm-next)
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>
> > To: "CKI Project" <cki-project@redhat.com>
> > Cc: "catalin marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "Memory Management"
> > <mm-qe@redhat.com>, "Jeff Bastian"
> > <jbastian@redhat.com>, "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>,
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 10:21:05 AM
> > Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel	5.9.0 (arm-next)
> > 
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:48:13AM -0000, CKI Project wrote:
> > > We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
> > > 
> > >        Kernel repo:
> > >        https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> > >             Commit: 51d96ff83ed7 - Merge branch 'for-next/core' into
> > >             for-kernelci
> > > 
> > > The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> > > 
> > >     Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
> > >              Merge: OK
> > >            Compile: OK
> > >              Tests: FAILED
> > > 
> > > All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download
> > > here:
> > > 
> > >   https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2020/10/15/615400
> > > 
> > > One or more kernel tests failed:
> > > 
> > >     aarch64:
> > >      ❌ stress: stress-ng
> > 
> > There's an interested WARN from the scheduler in the stress-ng run, but the
> > failures look more like they're related to the infrastructure because all
> > of
> > the invocations seem to be saying "(Expected 0,2,3, got 0)".
> > 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I see a test timeout because it took too long which I don't think is
> related to kernel (we've already submitted a bug to the test framework
> to allow proper detection of it but it wasn't fixed yet, sorry!).
> 
> However, we're also hunting down a bug in mm/usercopy which is triggered
> by stress-ng which we've seen so far on block and mainline, and the
> subtest that triggers it wasn't ran due to the timeout. I resubmitted
> the test job to check if your tree is affected as well and will let you
> know if we see the panic.
> 

Hi, the resubmitted testing didn't hit the timeout and neither the
usercopy bug.

Veronika

> 
> Veronika
> 
> > >      ❌ LTP
> > 
> > This looks like a broken setup:
> > 
> >      7	RTNETLINK answers: Operation not permitted
> >      8	netns_breakns_ns_exec_ipv4_ioctl 1 TBROK: unable to create veth pair
> >      devices
> > 
> > Will
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-19 10:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-16  3:48 ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.9.0 (arm-next) CKI Project
2020-10-16  8:21 ` Will Deacon
2020-10-19  8:27   ` Veronika Kabatova
2020-10-19 10:29     ` Veronika Kabatova

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).