[PATCH v3 0/9] Add MT8173 Video Decoder Driver

[hansverk@cisco.com (Hans Verkuil)]

Hi Tiffany,

On 07/07/16 12:16, tiffany lin wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 15:19 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> Hi Tiffany,
>>
>> I plan to review this patch series on Friday, but one obvious question is
>> what the reason for these failures is:
>>
>>> Input/Output configuration ioctls:
>>>         test VIDIOC_ENUM/G/S/QUERY_STD: OK (Not Supported)
>>>         test VIDIOC_ENUM/G/S/QUERY_DV_TIMINGS: OK (Not Supported)
>>>         test VIDIOC_DV_TIMINGS_CAP: OK (Not Supported)
>>>         test VIDIOC_G/S_EDID: OK (Not Supported)
>>>
>>>         Control ioctls:
>>>                 test VIDIOC_QUERYCTRL/MENU: OK
>>>                 fail: ../../../v4l-utils-1.6.0/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-controls.cpp(357): g_ctrl returned an error (11)
>>>                 test VIDIOC_G/S_CTRL: FAIL
>>>                 fail: ../../../v4l-utils-1.6.0/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-controls.cpp(579): g_ext_ctrls returned an error (11)
>>>                 test VIDIOC_G/S/TRY_EXT_CTRLS: FAIL
> These fails are because VIDIOC_G_CTRL and VIDIOC_G_EXT_CTRLS return
> V4L2_CID_MIN_BUFFERS_FOR_CAPTURE only when dirver in MTK_STATE_HEADER
> state, or it will return EAGAIN.
> This could help user space get correct value, not default value that may
> changed base on media content.

So this should be improved in v4l2-compliance.

> 
>>>                 fail: ../../../v4l-utils-1.6.0/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-controls.cpp(721): subscribe event for control 'User Controls' failed
>>>                 test VIDIOC_(UN)SUBSCRIBE_EVENT/DQEVENT: FAIL
> Driver do not support subscribe event for control 'User Controls' for
> now.
> Do we need to support this?

Let me check: this might be a knock-on effect from the previous error.

Which controls does your driver have? (v4l2-ctl -l)

> 
>>>                 test VIDIOC_G/S_JPEGCOMP: OK (Not Supported)
>>>                 Standard Controls: 2 Private Controls: 0
>>>
>>>         Format ioctls:
>>>                 test VIDIOC_ENUM_FMT/FRAMESIZES/FRAMEINTERVALS: OK
>>>                 test VIDIOC_G/S_PARM: OK (Not Supported)
>>>                 test VIDIOC_G_FBUF: OK (Not Supported)
>>>                 fail: ../../../v4l-utils-1.6.0/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-formats.cpp(405): expected EINVAL, but got 11 when getting format for buftype 9
>>>                 test VIDIOC_G_FMT: FAIL
> This is because vidioc_vdec_g_fmt only succeed when context is in
> MTK_STATE_HEADER state, or user space cannot get correct format data
> using this function.

I'll take a look at this as well.

> 
>>>                 test VIDIOC_TRY_FMT: OK (Not Supported)
>>>                 test VIDIOC_S_FMT: OK (Not Supported)
>>>                 test VIDIOC_G_SLICED_VBI_CAP: OK (Not Supported)
>>>
>>>         Codec ioctls:
>>>                 test VIDIOC_(TRY_)ENCODER_CMD: OK (Not Supported)
>>>                 test VIDIOC_G_ENC_INDEX: OK (Not Supported)
>>>                 test VIDIOC_(TRY_)DECODER_CMD: OK (Not Supported)
>>>
>>>         Buffer ioctls:
>>>                 test VIDIOC_REQBUFS/CREATE_BUFS/QUERYBUF: OK
>>>                 fail: ../../../v4l-utils-1.6.0/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-buffers.cpp(500): q.has_expbuf(node)

Don't use v4l-utils-1.6: just use the latest master branch. That way you can
be certain that the latest fixes are in. Besides, 1.6.0 is really old (almost
two years!). If you used the same old version for the encoder driver as well,
then please retest that encoder driver!

> Our OUTPUT and CAPTURE queue support both VB2_DMABUF and VB2_MMAP, user
> space can select which to use in runtime.
> So our driver default support v4l2_m2m_ioctl_expbuf functionality.
> In v4l2-compliance test, it will check v4l2_m2m_ioctl_expbuf only valid
> when node->valid_memorytype is V4L2_MEMORY_MMAP.
> So when go through node->valid_memorytype is V4L2_MEMORY_DMABUF, it
> fail.

That sounds like a bug. I'll take a look. For all I know, this is fixed in the
master branch.

Regards,

	Hans

> 
> 
> best regards,
> Tiffany
> 
> 
> 
>>>                 test VIDIOC_EXPBUF: FAIL
>>>
>>>
>>> Total: 38, Succeeded: 33, Failed: 5, Warnings: 0
>>
>> If it is due to a bug in v4l2-compliance, then let me know and I'll fix it. If not,
>> then it should be fixed in the driver.
>>
>> Frankly, it was the presence of these failures that made me think this patch series
>> wasn't final. Before a v4l2 driver can be accepted in the kernel, v4l2-compliance must pass.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> 	Hans
> 
>