linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
	 Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, khilman@baylibre.com,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/3] clk: divider: Add re-usable determine_rate implementations
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 22:33:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCB+5bFH0LW4rqYGCiO-X-xmer67cp5kXpyU0d-OfxiOvw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1jtun01o5p.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>

Hi Jerome,

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:44 AM Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> wrote:
[...]
> > +int divider_ro_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req,
> > +                           const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
> > +                           unsigned long flags, unsigned int val)
> > +{
> > +     int div;
> > +
> > +     div = _get_div(table, val, flags, width);
> > +
> > +     /* Even a read-only clock can propagate a rate change */
> > +     if (clk_hw_get_flags(hw) & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
> > +             if (!req->best_parent_hw)
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +             req->best_parent_rate = clk_hw_round_rate(req->best_parent_hw,
> > +                                                       req->rate * div);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     req->rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)req->best_parent_rate, div);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(divider_ro_determine_rate);
>
> For a final version, could you factorize the code with the .round_rate()
> variant ? It would remove a bit of duplication.
my first idea was to basically let the new _determine_rate code just
forward all relevant parameters to _round_rate
however, I discarded that as it turned out to be less understandable
for me as parameters need to be mapped in both ways

while writing this mail I noticed that the opposite direction
(meaning: _round_rate forwards to _determine_rate) will probably work.
I'll give it a try in the next days
if you had anything else in mind then please let me know

> Maybe determine_rate() can also replace round_rate() in the generic
> divider ops ?
sure, I'll add that as a separate patch in this series
note to myself: testing can be done with the MMC drivers as we're
using the generic clk_divider_ops there


Best regards,
Martin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-18 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-17 20:37 [PATCH RFC v1 0/3] clk: meson: rounding for fast clocks on 32-bit SoCs Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-17 20:37 ` [PATCH RFC v1 1/3] clk: divider: Add re-usable determine_rate implementations Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-18  7:44   ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18 20:33     ` Martin Blumenstingl [this message]
2021-05-19 12:31       ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-17 20:37 ` [PATCH RFC v1 2/3] clk: meson: regmap: switch to determine_rate for the dividers Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-18  7:47   ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-17 20:37 ` [PATCH RFC v1 3/3] clk: meson: pll: switch to determine_rate for the PLL ops Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-18  7:50   ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18 20:17     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-19 15:10       ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18  7:37 ` [PATCH RFC v1 0/3] clk: meson: rounding for fast clocks on 32-bit SoCs Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18 20:20   ` Martin Blumenstingl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFBinCB+5bFH0LW4rqYGCiO-X-xmer67cp5kXpyU0d-OfxiOvw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).