From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Ruizhe Lin <linruizhe@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] amba: Properly handle device probe without IRQ domain
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 13:08:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx8SY14rcd7g=Gdwmw7sUMb=jdEV+ffuNpg6btDoL1jmWw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqLBddXVeP-t++wqPNp=xYF7tvEcnCbjFnK9CUBLK2+9JA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 1:05 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> +Saravana
>
> Saravana mentioned to me there may be some issues with this one...
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 2:43 AM Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > of_amba_device_create() uses irq_of_parse_and_map() to translate
> > a DT interrupt specification into a Linux virtual interrupt number.
> >
> > But it doesn't properly handle the case where the interrupt controller
> > is not yet available, eg, when pl011 interrupt is connected to MBIGEN
> > interrupt controller, because the mbigen initialization is too late,
> > which will lead to no IRQ due to no IRQ domain found, log is shown below,
> > "irq: no irq domain found for uart0 !"
> >
> > use of_irq_get() to return -EPROBE_DEFER as above, and in the function
> > amba_device_try_add()/amba_device_add(), it will properly handle in such
> > case, also return 0 in other fail cases to be consistent as before.
> >
> > Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
> > Reported-by: Ruizhe Lin <linruizhe@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/amba/bus.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/of/platform.c | 6 +-----
> > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/amba/bus.c b/drivers/amba/bus.c
> > index 36f2f42c8014..720aa6cdd402 100644
> > --- a/drivers/amba/bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/amba/bus.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> > #include <linux/clk/clk-conf.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/reset.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/irq.h>
> >
> > @@ -371,12 +372,38 @@ static void amba_device_release(struct device *dev)
> > kfree(d);
> > }
> >
> > +static int of_amba_device_decode_irq(struct amba_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *node = dev->dev.of_node;
> > + int i, irq = 0;
> > +
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_IRQ) && node) {
> > + /* Decode the IRQs and address ranges */
> > + for (i = 0; i < AMBA_NR_IRQS; i++) {
> > + irq = of_irq_get(node, i);
> > + if (irq < 0) {
> > + if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + return irq;
> > + irq = 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dev->irq[i] = irq;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int amba_device_try_add(struct amba_device *dev, struct resource *parent)
> > {
> > u32 size;
> > void __iomem *tmp;
> > int i, ret;
> >
> > + ret = of_amba_device_decode_irq(dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto err_out;
> > +
Similar to other resources the AMBA bus "gets" for the device, I think
this should be moved into amba_probe() and not here. There's no reason
to delay the addition of the device (and loading its module) because
the IRQ isn't ready yet.
-Saravana
> > ret = request_resource(parent, &dev->res);
> > if (ret)
> > goto err_out;
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > index 74afbb7a4f5e..32d5ff8df747 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
> > {
> > struct amba_device *dev;
> > const void *prop;
> > - int i, ret;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > pr_debug("Creating amba device %pOF\n", node);
> >
> > @@ -253,10 +253,6 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
> > if (prop)
> > dev->periphid = of_read_ulong(prop, 1);
> >
> > - /* Decode the IRQs and address ranges */
> > - for (i = 0; i < AMBA_NR_IRQS; i++)
> > - dev->irq[i] = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, i);
> > -
> > ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &dev->res);
> > if (ret) {
> > pr_err("amba: of_address_to_resource() failed (%d) for %pOF\n",
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> >
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-24 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-16 7:46 [PATCH 0/3] amba: Properly handle device probe without IRQ domain Kefeng Wang
2021-08-16 7:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] amba: Drop unused functions about APB/AHB devices add Kefeng Wang
2021-08-16 7:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] Revert "ARM: amba: make use of -1 IRQs warn" Kefeng Wang
2021-08-16 7:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] amba: Properly handle device probe without IRQ domain Kefeng Wang
2021-08-24 20:05 ` Rob Herring
2021-08-24 20:08 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2021-08-25 4:05 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-08-25 8:04 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-08-25 8:39 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-08-26 2:45 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-08-26 4:45 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-08-26 6:22 ` Kefeng Wang
[not found] ` <df8e7756-8b0d-d7de-a9ff-3f6eb0ffa8a5@huawei.com>
2021-08-27 0:04 ` [BUG] amba: Remove deferred device addition Saravana Kannan
[not found] ` <85b28900-5f42-b997-2ded-0b952bc2a03e@huawei.com>
2021-08-27 19:09 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-08-28 1:09 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-09-09 3:30 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-09-10 7:59 ` Kefeng Wang
2022-07-05 19:25 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-08-27 10:26 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-08-25 12:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] amba: Properly handle device probe without IRQ domain Rob Herring
2021-08-25 14:41 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-08-17 22:27 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Rob Herring
2021-08-23 2:19 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-08-23 9:05 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-08-23 10:57 ` Kefeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGETcx8SY14rcd7g=Gdwmw7sUMb=jdEV+ffuNpg6btDoL1jmWw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=linruizhe@huawei.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).