From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64 fix for 5.14
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 10:16:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg=+P1+HQXhrszxN_BgWtLc-=dWiT61KzogcJU3hnLrtQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210827171041.GA28149@lst.de>
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 10:10 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>
> They CCed me on their earlier discussion, but I did not catch up on it
> until you responded to the pull request If I understood it correct it
> was about a platform device mapping a MMIO region (like a PCI bar),
> but something about section alignment cause pfn_valid to mistrigger.
Yeah, so I can easily see the maxpfn numbers can easily end up being
rounded up to a whole memory section etc.
I think my suggested solution should JustWork(tm) - exactly because if
the area is then in that "this pfn is valid" area, it will
double-check the actual underlying page.
That said, I think x86 avoids the problem another way - by just making
sure max_pfn is exact. That works too, as long as there are no holes
in the RAM map that might be used for PCI BAR's.
So I think arm could fix it that way too, depending on their memory layout.
(x86 has that traditional hole at A0000-FFFFF, but it's special enough
that it presumably is never an issue).
Linus
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-27 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-26 13:17 [GIT PULL] arm64 fix for 5.14 Will Deacon
2021-08-26 18:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-08-27 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-27 17:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-08-27 17:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-27 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2021-08-31 13:31 ` Will Deacon
2021-08-31 19:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-31 16:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-26 18:52 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wg=+P1+HQXhrszxN_BgWtLc-=dWiT61KzogcJU3hnLrtQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).