* Re: [PATCH 5.14 000/151] 5.14.12-rc1 review
[not found] <20211011134517.833565002@linuxfoundation.org>
@ 2021-10-11 18:35 ` Naresh Kamboju
2021-10-11 19:11 ` Naresh Kamboju
2021-10-11 19:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-10-12 10:27 ` Naresh Kamboju
1 sibling, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2021-10-11 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, Florian Fainelli, patches, lkft-triage,
Jon Hunter, linux-stable, Pavel Machek, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck, Linux ARM, Arnd Bergmann
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 19:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.14.12 release.
> There are 151 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 13 Oct 2021 13:44:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.14.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.14.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
Regression found on arm x15 device.
metadata:
git branch: linux-5.14.y
git repo: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
git commit: d98305d056b808dd938d2ae6bfd0e3ccac00a106
git describe: v5.14.11-152-gd98305d056b8
make_kernelversion: 5.14.12-rc1
kernel-config: https://builds.tuxbuild.com/1zMbwi83MvhJdKpC0LTvxvIh1Fb/config
Crash log,
[ 0.000000] Linux version 5.14.12-rc1 (tuxmake@tuxmake)
(arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Debian 11.1.0-1) 11.1.0, GNU ld (GNU
Binutils for Debian) 2.36.90.20210705) #1 SMP @1633961260
[ 0.000000] CPU: ARMv7 Processor [412fc0f2] revision 2 (ARMv7), cr=10c5387d
<trim>
[ 5.403076] Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel
stack is corrupted in: __lock_acquire+0x2520/0x326c
[ 5.413574] CPU: 0 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/0:0H Not tainted 5.14.12-rc1 #1
[ 5.420227] Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree)
[ 5.426361] Backtrace:
[ 5.428863] [<c153b5e8>] (dump_backtrace) from [<c153b9a8>]
(show_stack+0x20/0x24)
[ 5.436492] r7:c2109acc r6:00000080 r5:c1c3c52c r4:60000193
[ 5.442169] [<c153b988>] (show_stack) from [<c1542cf8>]
(dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x78)
[ 5.449798] [<c1542c98>] (dump_stack_lvl) from [<c1542d28>]
(dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
[ 5.457427] r7:c2109acc r6:c1c1d4ac r5:00000000 r4:c23a1aa8
[ 5.463104] [<c1542d10>] (dump_stack) from [<c153c800>] (panic+0x13c/0x370)
[ 5.470123] [<c153c6c4>] (panic) from [<c1555854>]
(lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x0/0x1d0)
[ 5.477752] r3:c28033d0 r2:a519091a r1:c03dc7ec r0:c1c1d4ac
[ 5.483428] r7:c2109acc
[ 5.485992] [<c1555838>] (__stack_chk_fail) from [<c03dc7ec>]
(__lock_acquire+0x2520/0x326c)
[ 5.494476] [<c03da2cc>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c03ddfe0>]
(lock_acquire+0x140/0x414)
[ 5.502471] r10:60000193 r9:00000080 r8:2ca87000 r7:c31c4128
r6:c20935e0 r5:c20935e0
[ 5.510345] r4:c31c4000
[ 5.512878] [<c03ddea0>] (lock_acquire) from [<c03a2e1c>]
(account_system_index_time+0xf0/0x284)
[ 5.521728] r10:c31c4000 r9:eeb1fa40 r8:eeb1a4f0 r7:00000002
r6:c321db80 r5:00000000
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Full test log link,
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/3719571#L2392
zImage:
https://builds.tuxbuild.com/1zMbwi83MvhJdKpC0LTvxvIh1Fb/zImage
Build link,
https://builds.tuxbuild.com/1zMbwi83MvhJdKpC0LTvxvIh1Fb/
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.14 000/151] 5.14.12-rc1 review
2021-10-11 18:35 ` [PATCH 5.14 000/151] 5.14.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
@ 2021-10-11 19:11 ` Naresh Kamboju
2021-10-11 19:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2021-10-11 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, Florian Fainelli, patches, lkft-triage,
Jon Hunter, linux-stable, Pavel Machek, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck, Linux ARM, Arnd Bergmann
Hi Greg,
The reported crash on the arm x15 is an intermittent problem.
Which is also noticed on Linux next and mainline.
We are investigating this problem.
This reported crash is not specific to this rc review.
- Naresh
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.14 000/151] 5.14.12-rc1 review
2021-10-11 18:35 ` [PATCH 5.14 000/151] 5.14.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
2021-10-11 19:11 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2021-10-11 19:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-10-11 21:34 ` Naresh Kamboju
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2021-10-11 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: open list, lkft-triage, linux-stable, Pavel Machek, Linux ARM,
Arnd Bergmann
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:35 PM Naresh Kamboju
<naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 19:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regression found on arm x15 device.
>
> metadata:
> git branch: linux-5.14.y
> git repo: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
> git commit: d98305d056b808dd938d2ae6bfd0e3ccac00a106
> git describe: v5.14.11-152-gd98305d056b8
> make_kernelversion: 5.14.12-rc1
> kernel-config: https://builds.tuxbuild.com/1zMbwi83MvhJdKpC0LTvxvIh1Fb/config
>
> Crash log,
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.14.12-rc1 (tuxmake@tuxmake)
> (arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Debian 11.1.0-1) 11.1.0, GNU ld (GNU
> Binutils for Debian) 2.36.90.20210705) #1 SMP @1633961260
> [ 0.000000] CPU: ARMv7 Processor [412fc0f2] revision 2 (ARMv7), cr=10c5387d
> <trim>
> [ 5.403076] Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel
> stack is corrupted in: __lock_acquire+0x2520/0x326c
> [ 5.413574] CPU: 0 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/0:0H Not tainted 5.14.12-rc1 #1
> [ 5.420227] Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree)
> [ 5.426361] Backtrace:
> [ 5.428863] [<c153b5e8>] (dump_backtrace) from [<c153b9a8>]
> (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
> [ 5.436492] r7:c2109acc r6:00000080 r5:c1c3c52c r4:60000193
> [ 5.442169] [<c153b988>] (show_stack) from [<c1542cf8>]
> (dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x78)
> [ 5.449798] [<c1542c98>] (dump_stack_lvl) from [<c1542d28>]
> (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
> [ 5.457427] r7:c2109acc r6:c1c1d4ac r5:00000000 r4:c23a1aa8
> [ 5.463104] [<c1542d10>] (dump_stack) from [<c153c800>] (panic+0x13c/0x370)
> [ 5.470123] [<c153c6c4>] (panic) from [<c1555854>]
> (lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x0/0x1d0)
> [ 5.477752] r3:c28033d0 r2:a519091a r1:c03dc7ec r0:c1c1d4ac
> [ 5.483428] r7:c2109acc
> [ 5.485992] [<c1555838>] (__stack_chk_fail) from [<c03dc7ec>]
> (__lock_acquire+0x2520/0x326c)
> [ 5.494476] [<c03da2cc>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c03ddfe0>]
> (lock_acquire+0x140/0x414)
> [ 5.502471] r10:60000193 r9:00000080 r8:2ca87000 r7:c31c4128
> r6:c20935e0 r5:c20935e0
> [ 5.510345] r4:c31c4000
> [ 5.512878] [<c03ddea0>] (lock_acquire) from [<c03a2e1c>]
> (account_system_index_time+0xf0/0x284)
> [ 5.521728] r10:c31c4000 r9:eeb1fa40 r8:eeb1a4f0 r7:00000002
> r6:c321db80 r5:00000000
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> Full test log link,
> https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/3719571#L2392
>
> zImage:
> https://builds.tuxbuild.com/1zMbwi83MvhJdKpC0LTvxvIh1Fb/zImage
>
> Build link,
> https://builds.tuxbuild.com/1zMbwi83MvhJdKpC0LTvxvIh1Fb/
It looks like a really long backtrace, and there is something about stack
corruption, so I wonder if the stack is actually overflowing here. Can
you see if the same thing happens with Ard's vmap-stack branch from [1]
or if that shows a different output?
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux.git/log/?h=arm-vmap-stacks
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.14 000/151] 5.14.12-rc1 review
2021-10-11 19:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2021-10-11 21:34 ` Naresh Kamboju
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2021-10-11 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: open list, lkft-triage, linux-stable, Pavel Machek, Linux ARM
> It looks like a really long backtrace, and there is something about stack
> corruption, so I wonder if the stack is actually overflowing here. Can
> you see if the same thing happens with Ard's vmap-stack branch from [1]
> or if that shows a different output?
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux.git/log/?h=arm-vmap-stacks
I do not see any crash on this tree and arm-vmap-stacks branch.
- Naresh
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.14 000/151] 5.14.12-rc1 review
[not found] <20211011134517.833565002@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-10-11 18:35 ` [PATCH 5.14 000/151] 5.14.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
@ 2021-10-12 10:27 ` Naresh Kamboju
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2021-10-12 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, Florian Fainelli, patches, lkft-triage,
Jon Hunter, linux-stable, Pavel Machek, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck, Arnd Bergmann, Linux ARM
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 19:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.14.12 release.
> There are 151 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 13 Oct 2021 13:44:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.14.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.14.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
Regressions detected on arm.
The reported crash on the arm x15 is an intermittent problem.
Which is also noticed on Linux next and mainline.
We are investigating this problem.
Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel
stack is corrupted in: __lock_acquire+0x2520/0x326c
URL:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYutz0ZgJ=rrg8=Fd7vh9c7G-SJfF2YoH5wZyGzUHu4Dqw@mail.gmail.com/
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.14.12-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.14.y
* git commit: d98305d056b808dd938d2ae6bfd0e3ccac00a106
* git describe: v5.14.11-152-gd98305d056b8
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.14.y/build/v5.14.11-152-gd98305d056b8
## No regressions (compared to v5.14.11)
## No fixes (compared to v5.14.11)
## Test result summary
total: 94671, pass: 79926, fail: 1186, skip: 12797, xfail: 762
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 289 total, 289 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 30 total, 30 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* prep-tmp-disk
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-12 10:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20211011134517.833565002@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-10-11 18:35 ` [PATCH 5.14 000/151] 5.14.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
2021-10-11 19:11 ` Naresh Kamboju
2021-10-11 19:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-10-11 21:34 ` Naresh Kamboju
2021-10-12 10:27 ` Naresh Kamboju
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).