From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>,
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>,
Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: add __always_inline to functions called from __get_user_check()
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 10:03:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=NObDXDL3jz9ZX9wo4tn747peBJPTj0DXyLerixgL+wQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191001083701.27207-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 1:37 AM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
>
> KernelCI reports that bcm2835_defconfig is no longer booting since
> commit ac7c3e4ff401 ("compiler: enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING
> forcibly") (https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/26/825).
>
> I also received a regression report from Nicolas Saenz Julienne
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/27/263).
>
> This problem has cropped up on bcm2835_defconfig because it enables
> CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE. The compiler tends to prefer not inlining
> functions with -Os. I was able to reproduce it with other boards and
> defconfig files by manually enabling CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE.
>
> The __get_user_check() specifically uses r0, r1, r2 registers.
> So, uaccess_save_and_enable() and uaccess_restore() must be inlined.
> Otherwise, those register assignments would be entirely dropped,
> according to my analysis of the disassembly.
>
> Prior to commit 9012d011660e ("compiler: allow all arches to enable
> CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING"), the 'inline' marker was always enough for
> inlining functions, except on x86.
>
> Since that commit, all architectures can enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING.
> So, __always_inline is now the only guaranteed way of forcible inlining.
No, the C preprocessor is the only guaranteed way of inlining. I
preferred v1; if you're going to <strikethrough>play with
fire</strikethrough>write assembly, don't get burned.
>
> I also added __always_inline to 4 functions in the call-graph from the
> __get_user_check() macro.
>
> Fixes: 9012d011660e ("compiler: allow all arches to enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING")
> Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org>
> Reported-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Use __always_inline instead of changing the function call places
> (per Russell King)
> - The previous submission is: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1132459/
>
> arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h | 8 ++++----
> arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
> index 567dbede4785..f1d0a7807cd0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15_MMU
> -static inline unsigned int get_domain(void)
> +static __always_inline unsigned int get_domain(void)
> {
> unsigned int domain;
>
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline unsigned int get_domain(void)
> return domain;
> }
>
> -static inline void set_domain(unsigned val)
> +static __always_inline void set_domain(unsigned int val)
> {
> asm volatile(
> "mcr p15, 0, %0, c3, c0 @ set domain"
> @@ -102,12 +102,12 @@ static inline void set_domain(unsigned val)
> isb();
> }
> #else
> -static inline unsigned int get_domain(void)
> +static __always_inline unsigned int get_domain(void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline void set_domain(unsigned val)
> +static __always_inline void set_domain(unsigned int val)
> {
> }
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 303248e5b990..98c6b91be4a8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
> * perform such accesses (eg, via list poison values) which could then
> * be exploited for priviledge escalation.
> */
> -static inline unsigned int uaccess_save_and_enable(void)
> +static __always_inline unsigned int uaccess_save_and_enable(void)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN
> unsigned int old_domain = get_domain();
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static inline unsigned int uaccess_save_and_enable(void)
> #endif
> }
>
> -static inline void uaccess_restore(unsigned int flags)
> +static __always_inline void uaccess_restore(unsigned int flags)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN
> /* Restore the user access mask */
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-01 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-01 8:37 [PATCH v2] ARM: add __always_inline to functions called from __get_user_check() Masahiro Yamada
2019-10-01 9:03 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-10-01 17:03 ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2019-10-02 8:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-10-02 10:45 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-10-02 13:01 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKwvOd=NObDXDL3jz9ZX9wo4tn747peBJPTj0DXyLerixgL+wQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=allison@lohutok.net \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=info@metux.net \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).