From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: mm: correct the inside linear map boundaries during hotplug check
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:34:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXESuD-von_dtzYcUMwK7TLF=qTki9bd8_iTo_isBwj13g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+CK2bA7Xz0Zg5phsQi3mhnp+_PHLAAGRLgFTQNw1FjBHaXsHA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 20:30, Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> wrote:
>
> > Can't we simply use signed arithmetic here? This expression works fine
> > if the quantities are all interpreted as s64 instead of u64
>
> I was thinking about that, but I do not like the idea of using sign
> arithmetics for physical addresses. Also, I am worried that someone in
> the future will unknowingly change it to unsigns or to phys_addr_t. It
> is safer to have start explicitly set to 0 in case of wrap.
memstart_addr is already a s64 for this exact reason.
Btw, the KASLR check is incorrect: memstart_addr could also be
negative when running the 52-bit VA kernel on hardware that is only
48-bit VA capable.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-15 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-15 19:22 [PATCH v2 0/1] correct the inside linear map boundaries during hotplug check Pavel Tatashin
2021-02-15 19:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: mm: " Pavel Tatashin
2021-02-15 19:27 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-15 19:30 ` Pavel Tatashin
2021-02-15 19:34 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2021-02-15 19:51 ` Pavel Tatashin
2021-02-15 22:28 ` Pavel Tatashin
2021-02-16 3:12 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-02-16 7:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-16 14:34 ` Pavel Tatashin
2021-02-16 2:55 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-02-16 14:48 ` Pavel Tatashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMj1kXESuD-von_dtzYcUMwK7TLF=qTki9bd8_iTo_isBwj13g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).