linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: mm: correct the inside linear map boundaries during hotplug check
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:27:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXGxyV0=s6jVZ674O_2amkYSnwSnubnozbzD6g6GOMJE-A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210215192237.362706-2-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>

On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 20:22, Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> wrote:
>
> Memory hotplug may fail on systems with CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE because the
> linear map range is not checked correctly.
>
> The start physical address that linear map covers can be actually at the
> end of the range because of randomization. Check that and if so reduce it
> to 0.
>
> This can be verified on QEMU with setting kaslr-seed to ~0ul:
>
> memstart_offset_seed = 0xffff
> START: __pa(_PAGE_OFFSET(vabits_actual)) = ffff9000c0000000
> END:   __pa(PAGE_END - 1) =  1000bfffffff
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> Fixes: 58284a901b42 ("arm64/mm: Validate hotplug range before creating linear mapping")
> Tested-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index ae0c3d023824..cc16443ea67f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -1444,14 +1444,30 @@ static void __remove_pgd_mapping(pgd_t *pgdir, unsigned long start, u64 size)
>
>  static bool inside_linear_region(u64 start, u64 size)
>  {
> +       u64 start_linear_pa = __pa(_PAGE_OFFSET(vabits_actual));
> +       u64 end_linear_pa = __pa(PAGE_END - 1);
> +
> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE)) {
> +               /*
> +                * Check for a wrap, it is possible because of randomized linear
> +                * mapping the start physical address is actually bigger than
> +                * the end physical address. In this case set start to zero
> +                * because [0, end_linear_pa] range must still be able to cover
> +                * all addressable physical addresses.
> +                */
> +               if (start_linear_pa > end_linear_pa)
> +                       start_linear_pa = 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       WARN_ON(start_linear_pa > end_linear_pa);
> +
>         /*
>          * Linear mapping region is the range [PAGE_OFFSET..(PAGE_END - 1)]
>          * accommodating both its ends but excluding PAGE_END. Max physical
>          * range which can be mapped inside this linear mapping range, must
>          * also be derived from its end points.
>          */
> -       return start >= __pa(_PAGE_OFFSET(vabits_actual)) &&
> -              (start + size - 1) <= __pa(PAGE_END - 1);

Can't we simply use signed arithmetic here? This expression works fine
if the quantities are all interpreted as s64 instead of u64


> +       return start >= start_linear_pa && (start + size - 1) <= end_linear_pa;
>  }
>
>  int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> --
> 2.25.1
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-15 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-15 19:22 [PATCH v2 0/1] correct the inside linear map boundaries during hotplug check Pavel Tatashin
2021-02-15 19:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: mm: " Pavel Tatashin
2021-02-15 19:27   ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2021-02-15 19:30     ` Pavel Tatashin
2021-02-15 19:34       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-15 19:51         ` Pavel Tatashin
2021-02-15 22:28           ` Pavel Tatashin
2021-02-16  3:12           ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-02-16  7:36             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-16 14:34               ` Pavel Tatashin
2021-02-16  2:55     ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-02-16 14:48       ` Pavel Tatashin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMj1kXGxyV0=s6jVZ674O_2amkYSnwSnubnozbzD6g6GOMJE-A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).