[PATCH] scmi/optee: fix response size warning

[PATCH] scmi/optee: fix response size warning

[Vincent Guittot]

Some protocols check the response size with the expected value but optee
shared memory doesn't return such size whereas it is available in the
optee output buffer.

As an example, the base protocol compares the response size with the
expected result when requesting the list of protocol which triggers a
warning with optee shared memory:

[    1.260306] arm-scmi firmware:scmi0: Malformed reply - real_sz:116  calc_sz:4  (loop_num_ret:4)

Save the output buffer length and use it when fetching the answer.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---

Tested on sudeep's for-next/scmi branch

 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
index b503c22cfd32..8abace56b958 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct scmi_optee_channel {
 	u32 channel_id;
 	u32 tee_session;
 	u32 caps;
+	u32 rx_len;
 	struct mutex mu;
 	struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo;
 	union {
@@ -302,6 +303,9 @@ static int invoke_process_msg_channel(struct scmi_optee_channel *channel, size_t
 		return -EIO;
 	}
 
+	/* Save response size */
+	channel->rx_len = param[2].u.memref.size;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -353,6 +357,7 @@ static int setup_dynamic_shmem(struct device *dev, struct scmi_optee_channel *ch
 	shbuf = tee_shm_get_va(channel->tee_shm, 0);
 	memset(shbuf, 0, msg_size);
 	channel->req.msg = shbuf;
+	channel->rx_len = msg_size;
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -508,7 +513,7 @@ static void scmi_optee_fetch_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
 	struct scmi_optee_channel *channel = cinfo->transport_info;
 
 	if (channel->tee_shm)
-		msg_fetch_response(channel->req.msg, SCMI_OPTEE_MAX_MSG_SIZE, xfer);
+		msg_fetch_response(channel->req.msg, channel->rx_len, xfer);
 	else
 		shmem_fetch_response(channel->req.shmem, xfer);
 }
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] scmi/optee: fix response size warning

[Cristian Marussi]

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 09:45:49AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Some protocols check the response size with the expected value but optee
> shared memory doesn't return such size whereas it is available in the
> optee output buffer.
> 
> As an example, the base protocol compares the response size with the
> expected result when requesting the list of protocol which triggers a
> warning with optee shared memory:
> 
> [    1.260306] arm-scmi firmware:scmi0: Malformed reply - real_sz:116  calc_sz:4  (loop_num_ret:4)
> 
> Save the output buffer length and use it when fetching the answer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

Hi Vincent,

> ---
> 
> Tested on sudeep's for-next/scmi branch
> 
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
> index b503c22cfd32..8abace56b958 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct scmi_optee_channel {
>  	u32 channel_id;
>  	u32 tee_session;
>  	u32 caps;
> +	u32 rx_len;
>  	struct mutex mu;
>  	struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo;
>  	union {
> @@ -302,6 +303,9 @@ static int invoke_process_msg_channel(struct scmi_optee_channel *channel, size_t
>  		return -EIO;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Save response size */
> +	channel->rx_len = param[2].u.memref.size;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -353,6 +357,7 @@ static int setup_dynamic_shmem(struct device *dev, struct scmi_optee_channel *ch
>  	shbuf = tee_shm_get_va(channel->tee_shm, 0);
>  	memset(shbuf, 0, msg_size);
>  	channel->req.msg = shbuf;
> +	channel->rx_len = msg_size;
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -508,7 +513,7 @@ static void scmi_optee_fetch_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
>  	struct scmi_optee_channel *channel = cinfo->transport_info;
>  
>  	if (channel->tee_shm)
> -		msg_fetch_response(channel->req.msg, SCMI_OPTEE_MAX_MSG_SIZE, xfer);
> +		msg_fetch_response(channel->req.msg, channel->rx_len, xfer);
>  	else
>  		shmem_fetch_response(channel->req.shmem, xfer);
>  }

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>

Thanks,
Cristian


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] scmi/optee: fix response size warning

[Etienne Carriere]

Hello Vincent,

On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 at 11:23, Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 09:45:49AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Some protocols check the response size with the expected value but optee
> > shared memory doesn't return such size whereas it is available in the
> > optee output buffer.
> >
> > As an example, the base protocol compares the response size with the
> > expected result when requesting the list of protocol which triggers a
> > warning with optee shared memory:
> >
> > [    1.260306] arm-scmi firmware:scmi0: Malformed reply - real_sz:116  calc_sz:4  (loop_num_ret:4)
> >
> > Save the output buffer length and use it when fetching the answer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> > ---
> >
> > Tested on sudeep's for-next/scmi branch
> >
> >  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c | 7 ++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
> > index b503c22cfd32..8abace56b958 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
> > @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct scmi_optee_channel {
> >       u32 channel_id;
> >       u32 tee_session;
> >       u32 caps;
> > +     u32 rx_len;
> >       struct mutex mu;
> >       struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo;
> >       union {
> > @@ -302,6 +303,9 @@ static int invoke_process_msg_channel(struct scmi_optee_channel *channel, size_t
> >               return -EIO;
> >       }
> >
> > +     /* Save response size */
> > +     channel->rx_len = param[2].u.memref.size;
> > +
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -353,6 +357,7 @@ static int setup_dynamic_shmem(struct device *dev, struct scmi_optee_channel *ch
> >       shbuf = tee_shm_get_va(channel->tee_shm, 0);
> >       memset(shbuf, 0, msg_size);
> >       channel->req.msg = shbuf;
> > +     channel->rx_len = msg_size;
> >
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -508,7 +513,7 @@ static void scmi_optee_fetch_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
> >       struct scmi_optee_channel *channel = cinfo->transport_info;
> >
> >       if (channel->tee_shm)
> > -             msg_fetch_response(channel->req.msg, SCMI_OPTEE_MAX_MSG_SIZE, xfer);
> > +             msg_fetch_response(channel->req.msg, channel->rx_len, xfer);
> >       else
> >               shmem_fetch_response(channel->req.shmem, xfer);
> >  }

Thanks for the fix.
Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>


>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Cristian
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] scmi/optee: fix response size warning

[Sudeep Holla]

On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:45:49 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Some protocols check the response size with the expected value but optee
> shared memory doesn't return such size whereas it is available in the
> optee output buffer.
> 
> As an example, the base protocol compares the response size with the
> expected result when requesting the list of protocol which triggers a
> warning with optee shared memory:
> 
> [...]

Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/juno), thanks!

[1/1] scmi/optee: fix response size warning
      https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/75c8f430d8

--
Regards,
Sudeep


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel