From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
To: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
Cc: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omprussia.ru>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] pata_imx: deny IRQ0
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:45:03 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5A3NiOOg8Zv1+mXh_VixuQ3=KLFPG-7CphQt-S997XV5A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6e3bb64-4715-01b1-5149-745507ffa7d4@omp.ru>
Hi Sergey,
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 5:49 PM Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru> wrote:
> > IMHO the current code is correct as-is.
>
> Not quite... I don't want to leave a bad example for the future driver authors. What should
> I change in the patch description for the patch to become acceptable for you?
Please see how the PCI subsystem has converted the handling of
platform_get_irq():
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?h=v5.15-rc2&id=0584bff09629666eea97c7ac428e55b00df211f5
Why does drivers/ata/ need to handle platform_get_irq() differently?
I still don't see the need for changing drivers/ata/pata_imx.c in this aspect.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-20 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-21 18:50 [PATCH 0/4] Explicitly deny IRQ0 in the libata drivers Sergey Shtylyov
2021-03-21 18:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] pata_imx: deny IRQ0 Sergey Shtylyov
2021-03-21 19:06 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-09-18 20:49 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-20 12:45 ` Fabio Estevam [this message]
2021-09-20 12:52 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-09-20 16:42 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-20 16:41 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-05-10 20:48 ` [PATCH 0/4] Explicitly deny IRQ0 in the libata drivers Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-04 18:57 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-04 21:25 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-05 9:47 ` Sergey Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOMZO5A3NiOOg8Zv1+mXh_VixuQ3=KLFPG-7CphQt-S997XV5A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
--cc=s.shtylyov@omprussia.ru \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).