Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 03/17] arm: gic: Provide per-IRQ helper functions

[Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>]

Hi Alex,

On 11/12/19 1:51 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 11/8/19 2:42 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> A common theme when accessing per-IRQ parameters in the GIC distributor
>> is to set fields of a certain bit width in a range of MMIO registers.
>> Examples are the enabled status (one bit per IRQ), the level/edge
>> configuration (2 bits per IRQ) or the priority (8 bits per IRQ).
>>
>> Add a generic helper function which is able to mask and set the
>> respective number of bits, given the IRQ number and the MMIO offset.
>> Provide wrappers using this function to easily allow configuring an IRQ.
>>
>> For now assume that private IRQ numbers always refer to the current CPU.
>> In a GICv2 accessing the "other" private IRQs is not easily doable (the
>> registers are banked per CPU on the same MMIO address), so we impose the
>> same limitation on GICv3, even though those registers are not banked
>> there anymore.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/arm/asm/gic-v3.h |  1 +
>>  lib/arm/asm/gic.h    |  9 +++++
>>  lib/arm/gic.c        | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/arm/asm/gic-v3.h b/lib/arm/asm/gic-v3.h
>> index ed6a5ad..8cfaed1 100644
>> --- a/lib/arm/asm/gic-v3.h
>> +++ b/lib/arm/asm/gic-v3.h
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>  #define GICD_CTLR_ENABLE_G1A		(1U << 1)
>>  #define GICD_CTLR_ENABLE_G1		(1U << 0)
>>  
>> +#define GICD_IROUTER			0x6000
>>  #define GICD_PIDR2			0xffe8
>>  
>>  /* Re-Distributor registers, offsets from RD_base */
>> diff --git a/lib/arm/asm/gic.h b/lib/arm/asm/gic.h
>> index 1fc10a0..21cdb58 100644
>> --- a/lib/arm/asm/gic.h
>> +++ b/lib/arm/asm/gic.h
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>  #define GICD_IIDR			0x0008
>>  #define GICD_IGROUPR			0x0080
>>  #define GICD_ISENABLER			0x0100
>> +#define GICD_ICENABLER			0x0180
>>  #define GICD_ISPENDR			0x0200
>>  #define GICD_ICPENDR			0x0280
>>  #define GICD_ISACTIVER			0x0300
>> @@ -73,5 +74,13 @@ extern void gic_write_eoir(u32 irqstat);
>>  extern void gic_ipi_send_single(int irq, int cpu);
>>  extern void gic_ipi_send_mask(int irq, const cpumask_t *dest);
>>  
>> +void gic_set_irq_bit(int irq, int offset);
>> +void gic_enable_irq(int irq);
>> +void gic_disable_irq(int irq);
>> +void gic_set_irq_priority(int irq, u8 prio);
>> +void gic_set_irq_target(int irq, int cpu);
>> +void gic_set_irq_group(int irq, int group);
>> +int gic_get_irq_group(int irq);
>> +
>>  #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
>>  #endif /* _ASMARM_GIC_H_ */
>> diff --git a/lib/arm/gic.c b/lib/arm/gic.c
>> index 9430116..cf4e811 100644
>> --- a/lib/arm/gic.c
>> +++ b/lib/arm/gic.c
>> @@ -146,3 +146,93 @@ void gic_ipi_send_mask(int irq, const cpumask_t *dest)
>>  	assert(gic_common_ops && gic_common_ops->ipi_send_mask);
>>  	gic_common_ops->ipi_send_mask(irq, dest);
>>  }
>> +
>> +enum gic_bit_access {
>> +	ACCESS_READ,
>> +	ACCESS_SET,
>> +	ACCESS_RMW
>> +};
>> +
>> +static u8 gic_masked_irq_bits(int irq, int offset, int bits, u8 value,
>> +			      enum gic_bit_access access)
>> +{
>> +	void *base;
>> +	int split = 32 / bits;
>> +	int shift = (irq % split) * bits;
>> +	u32 reg, mask = ((1U << bits) - 1) << shift;
>> +
>> +	switch (gic_version()) {
>> +	case 2:
>> +		base = gicv2_dist_base();
>> +		break;
>> +	case 3:
>> +		if (irq < 32)
>> +			base = gicv3_sgi_base();
>> +		else
>> +			base = gicv3_dist_base();
>> +		break;
>> +	default:
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +	base += offset + (irq / split) * 4;
> 
> This is probably not what you intended, if irq = 4 and split = 8, (irq / split) *
> 4 = 0. On the other hand, irq * 4 / split = 2.

I think that's correct. if bits = 4 this means there are 8 of such
fields in a word and the field corresponding to irq=4 is indeed located
in word 0.

Thanks

Eric
> 
>> +
>> +	switch (access) {
>> +	case ACCESS_READ:
>> +		return (readl(base) & mask) >> shift;
>> +	case ACCESS_SET:
>> +		reg = 0;
>> +		break;
>> +	case ACCESS_RMW:
>> +		reg = readl(base) & ~mask;
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	writel(reg | ((u32)value << shift), base);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> This function looks a bit out of place:
> - the function name has a verb in the past tense ('masked'), which makes me think
> it should return a bool, but the function actually performs an access to a GIC
> register.
> - the return value is an u8, but it returns an u32 on a read, because readl
> returns an u32.
> - the semantics of the function and the return value change based on the access
> parameter; worse yet, the return value on a write is completely ignored by the
> callers and the value parameter is ignored on reads.
> 
> You could split it into separate functions - see below.
> 
>> +
>> +void gic_set_irq_bit(int irq, int offset)
>> +{
>> +	gic_masked_irq_bits(irq, offset, 1, 1, ACCESS_SET);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void gic_enable_irq(int irq)
>> +{
>> +	gic_set_irq_bit(irq, GICD_ISENABLER);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void gic_disable_irq(int irq)
>> +{
>> +	gic_set_irq_bit(irq, GICD_ICENABLER);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void gic_set_irq_priority(int irq, u8 prio)
>> +{
>> +	gic_masked_irq_bits(irq, GICD_IPRIORITYR, 8, prio, ACCESS_RMW);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void gic_set_irq_target(int irq, int cpu)
>> +{
>> +	if (irq < 32)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (gic_version() == 2) {
>> +		gic_masked_irq_bits(irq, GICD_ITARGETSR, 8, 1U << cpu,
>> +				    ACCESS_RMW);
>> +
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	writeq(cpus[cpu], gicv3_dist_base() + GICD_IROUTER + irq * 8);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void gic_set_irq_group(int irq, int group)
>> +{
>> +	gic_masked_irq_bits(irq, GICD_IGROUPR, 1, group, ACCESS_RMW);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int gic_get_irq_group(int irq)
>> +{
>> +	return gic_masked_irq_bits(irq, GICD_IGROUPR, 1, 0, ACCESS_READ);
>> +}
> 
> The pattern for the public functions in this file is to check that the GIC has
> been initialized (assert(gic_common_ops)).
> 
> I propose we rewrite the functions like this (compile tested only):
> 
> diff --git a/lib/arm/gic.c b/lib/arm/gic.c
> index 94301169215c..1f5aa7b48828 100644
> --- a/lib/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/lib/arm/gic.c
> @@ -146,3 +146,89 @@ void gic_ipi_send_mask(int irq, const cpumask_t *dest)
>         assert(gic_common_ops && gic_common_ops->ipi_send_mask);
>         gic_common_ops->ipi_send_mask(irq, dest);
>  }
> +
> +static void *gic_get_irq_reg(int irq, int offset, int width)
> +{
> +       void *base;
> +
> +       switch (gic_version()) {
> +       case 2:
> +               base = gicv2_dist_base();
> +               break;
> +       case 3:
> +               if (irq < 32)
> +                       base = gicv3_sgi_base();
> +               else
> +                       base = gicv3_dist_base();
> +               break;
> +       default:
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       return base + offset + (irq * width / 32);
> +}
> +
> +static void gic_set_irq_field(int irq, int offset, int width, u32 value)
> +{
> +       void *reg;
> +       u32 val;
> +       int shift = (irq * width) % 32;
> +       u32 mask = ((1U << width) - 1) << shift;
> +
> +       reg = gic_get_irq_reg(irq, offset, width);
> +       val = readl(reg);
> +       val = (val & ~mask) | (value << shift);
> +       writel(val, reg);
> +}
> +
> +void gic_enable_irq(int irq)
> +{
> +       assert(gic_common_ops);
> +       gic_set_irq_field(irq, GICD_ISENABLER, 1, 1);
> +}
> +
> +void gic_disable_irq(int irq)
> +{
> +       assert(gic_common_ops);
> +       gic_set_irq_field(irq, GICD_ICENABLER, 1, 1);
> +}
> +
> +void gic_set_irq_priority(int irq, u8 prio)
> +{
> +       assert(gic_common_ops);
> +       gic_set_irq_field(irq, GICD_IPRIORITYR, 8, prio);
> +}
> +
> +void gic_set_irq_target(int irq, int cpu)
> +{
> +       assert(gic_common_ops);
> +
> +       if (irq < 32)
> +               return;
> +
> +       if (gic_version() == 2) {
> +               gic_set_irq_field(irq, GICD_ITARGETSR, 8, 1U << cpu);
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       writeq(cpus[cpu], gicv3_dist_base() + GICD_IROUTER + irq * 8);
> +}
> +
> +void gic_set_irq_group(int irq, int group)
> +{
> +       assert(gic_common_ops);
> +       gic_set_irq_field(irq, GICD_IGROUPR, 1, 1);
> +}
> +
> +int gic_get_irq_group(int irq)
> +{
> +       void *reg;
> +       u32 val;
> +       int shift = irq % 32;
> +
> +       assert(gic_common_ops);
> +       reg = gic_get_irq_reg(irq, GICD_IGROUPR, 1);
> +       val = readl(reg);
> +
> +       return (val >> shift) & 0x1;
> +}
> 
> A bit more lines of code, but to me more readable. What do you think?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel