linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Tom Murphy <tmurphy@arista.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, murphyt7@tcd.ie,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
	David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] iommu/dma-iommu: Handle deferred devices
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 23:40:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190507064000.GB5173@infradead.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190507064000.KiTPJdNq4mqpJFYRQ3a6jcWNKMT-z8jCWFFjWFXF0RY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190506185207.31069-3-tmurphy@arista.com>

On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 07:52:04PM +0100, Tom Murphy wrote:
> +static int handle_deferred_device(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_domain *domain;
> +	const struct iommu_ops *ops;
> +
> +	if (!is_kdump_kernel())
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);

> -	dma_handle =__iommu_dma_map(dev, phys, size,
> +	if (unlikely(handle_deferred_device(dev)))
> +		return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
> +
> +	dma_handle = __iommu_dma_map(dev, phys, size,

__iommu_dma_map already looks up the domain, and as far as I can
tell all callers need the handle_deferred_device call.  Should we
just move it to there and pass the domain from the caller?

Also shouldn't the iommu_attach_device call inside
handle_deferred_device also get an unlikely marker?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-07  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-06 18:52 [PATCH v3 0/4] iommu/amd: Convert the AMD iommu driver to the dma-iommu api Tom Murphy via iommu
2019-05-06 18:52 ` Tom Murphy
2019-05-06 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] iommu/dma-iommu: Handle deferred devices Tom Murphy
2019-05-06 18:52   ` Tom Murphy
2019-05-07  6:40   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-05-07  6:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-15 12:46     ` Tom Murphy
     [not found] ` <20190506185207.31069-1-tmurphy-nzgTgzXrdUbQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2019-05-06 18:52   ` [PATCH v3 1/4] iommu: Add gfp parameter to iommu_ops::map Tom Murphy via iommu
2019-05-06 18:52     ` Tom Murphy
2019-06-04 18:11     ` Robin Murphy
2019-06-04 20:55       ` Tom Murphy
2019-06-04 21:24       ` Rob Clark
2019-06-05  5:50     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-06 18:52   ` [PATCH v3 3/4] iommu/dma-iommu: Use the dev->coherent_dma_mask Tom Murphy via iommu
2019-05-06 18:52     ` Tom Murphy
2019-05-06 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] iommu/amd: Convert AMD iommu driver to the dma-iommu api Tom Murphy
2019-05-06 18:52   ` Tom Murphy
2019-06-03 10:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] iommu/amd: Convert the " Joerg Roedel
2019-06-03 11:27   ` Tom Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190507064000.GB5173@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
    --cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=murphyt7@tcd.ie \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=tmurphy@arista.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).