From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>,
Tengfei Fan <tengfeif@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Clear status bit on irq_unmask
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 07:51:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190610145132.DD1132085A@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbdkbSofrvJ0hSV66DX+DcwWXp0ONDjx0265Pz50yE8TA@mail.gmail.com>
Quoting Linus Walleij (2019-06-07 14:08:10)
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 8:52 AM Tengfei Fan <tengfeif@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> > The gpio interrupt status bit is getting set after the
> > irq is disabled and causing an immediate interrupt after
> > enablling the irq, so clear status bit on irq_unmask.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <tengfeif@codeaurora.org>
>
> This looks pretty serious, can one of the Qcom maintainers ACK
> this?
>
> Should it be sent to fixes and even stable?
>
> Fixes: tag?
>
How is the interrupt status bit getting set after the irq is disabled?
It looks like this is a level type interrupt? I thought that after
commit b55326dc969e ("pinctrl: msm: Really mask level interrupts to
prevent latching") this wouldn't be a problem. Am I wrong, or is qcom
just clearing out patches on drivers and this is the last one that needs
to be upstreamed?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-10 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-31 6:51 [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Clear status bit on irq_unmask Tengfei Fan
2019-06-07 21:08 ` Linus Walleij
2019-06-10 14:51 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2019-06-11 10:41 ` tengfeif
2019-06-11 18:51 ` Stephen Boyd
[not found] ` <671f87d6-f4a4-6d2c-967b-e1aa0677d83e@codeaurora.org>
2019-06-17 10:35 ` Fwd: " Neeraj Upadhyay
2019-06-17 11:50 ` Linus Walleij
2019-06-17 13:22 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190610145132.DD1132085A@mail.kernel.org \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.cassel@linaro.org \
--cc=tengfeif@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).