linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, guohanjun@huawei.com,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v3 10/15] iommu/arm-smmu: Use accessor functions for iommu private data
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:14:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200320091414.3941-11-joro@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200320091414.3941-1-joro@8bytes.org>

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>

Make use of dev_iommu_priv_set/get() functions and simplify the code
where possible with this change.

Tested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> # arm-smmu
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index 980aae73b45b..7aa36e6c19c0 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -98,12 +98,15 @@ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg {
 	s16				smendx[];
 };
 #define INVALID_SMENDX			-1
-#define __fwspec_cfg(fw) ((struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *)fw->iommu_priv)
-#define fwspec_smmu(fw)  (__fwspec_cfg(fw)->smmu)
-#define fwspec_smendx(fw, i) \
-	(i >= fw->num_ids ? INVALID_SMENDX : __fwspec_cfg(fw)->smendx[i])
-#define for_each_cfg_sme(fw, i, idx) \
-	for (i = 0; idx = fwspec_smendx(fw, i), i < fw->num_ids; ++i)
+#define __fwspec_cfg(dev) ((struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *)dev_iommu_priv_get(dev))
+#define fwspec_smmu(dev)  (__fwspec_cfg(dev)->smmu)
+#define fwspec_smendx(dev, i)				\
+	(i >= dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev)->num_ids ?	\
+		INVALID_SMENDX :			\
+		__fwspec_cfg(dev)->smendx[i])
+#define for_each_cfg_sme(dev, i, idx) \
+	for (i = 0; idx = fwspec_smendx(dev, i), \
+	     i < dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev)->num_ids; ++i)
 
 static bool using_legacy_binding, using_generic_binding;
 
@@ -1061,7 +1064,7 @@ static bool arm_smmu_free_sme(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int idx)
 static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
-	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
 	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = cfg->smmu;
 	struct arm_smmu_smr *smrs = smmu->smrs;
 	struct iommu_group *group;
@@ -1069,7 +1072,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
 
 	mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
 	/* Figure out a viable stream map entry allocation */
-	for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+	for_each_cfg_sme(dev, i, idx) {
 		u16 sid = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, fwspec->ids[i]);
 		u16 mask = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK, fwspec->ids[i]);
 
@@ -1100,7 +1103,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
 	iommu_group_put(group);
 
 	/* It worked! Now, poke the actual hardware */
-	for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+	for_each_cfg_sme(dev, i, idx) {
 		arm_smmu_write_sme(smmu, idx);
 		smmu->s2crs[idx].group = group;
 	}
@@ -1117,14 +1120,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
+static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct device *dev)
 {
-	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
-	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(dev);
 	int i, idx;
 
 	mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
-	for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+	for_each_cfg_sme(dev, i, idx) {
 		if (arm_smmu_free_sme(smmu, idx))
 			arm_smmu_write_sme(smmu, idx);
 		cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX;
@@ -1133,7 +1136,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
 }
 
 static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
-				      struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
+				      struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
 	struct arm_smmu_s2cr *s2cr = smmu->s2crs;
@@ -1146,7 +1149,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
 	else
 		type = S2CR_TYPE_TRANS;
 
-	for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+	for_each_cfg_sme(dev, i, idx) {
 		if (type == s2cr[idx].type && cbndx == s2cr[idx].cbndx)
 			continue;
 
@@ -1160,10 +1163,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
 
 static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 {
-	int ret;
+	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
 	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
 	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
-	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops) {
 		dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to SMMU, is it on the same bus?\n");
@@ -1177,10 +1180,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 	 * domains, just say no (but more politely than by dereferencing NULL).
 	 * This should be at least a WARN_ON once that's sorted.
 	 */
-	if (!fwspec->iommu_priv)
+	if (!dev_iommu_priv_get(dev))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
+	smmu = fwspec_smmu(dev);
 
 	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
 	if (ret < 0)
@@ -1204,7 +1207,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 	}
 
 	/* Looks ok, so add the device to the domain */
-	ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec);
+	ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, dev);
 
 	/*
 	 * Setup an autosuspend delay to avoid bouncing runpm state.
@@ -1429,7 +1432,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
 		goto out_free;
 
 	cfg->smmu = smmu;
-	fwspec->iommu_priv = cfg;
+	dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, cfg);
 	while (i--)
 		cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX;
 
@@ -1467,7 +1470,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
 	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops)
 		return;
 
-	cfg  = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+	cfg  = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
 	smmu = cfg->smmu;
 
 	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
@@ -1475,23 +1478,23 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
 		return;
 
 	iommu_device_unlink(&smmu->iommu, dev);
-	arm_smmu_master_free_smes(fwspec);
+	arm_smmu_master_free_smes(dev);
 
 	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
 
+	dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, NULL);
 	iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
-	kfree(fwspec->iommu_priv);
+	kfree(cfg);
 	iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
 }
 
 static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
 {
-	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
-	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
+	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(dev);
 	struct iommu_group *group = NULL;
 	int i, idx;
 
-	for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+	for_each_cfg_sme(dev, i, idx) {
 		if (group && smmu->s2crs[idx].group &&
 		    group != smmu->s2crs[idx].group)
 			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-20  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-20  9:13 [PATCH v3 00/15] iommu: Move iommu_fwspec out of 'struct device' Joerg Roedel
2020-03-20  9:14 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] iommu: Define dev_iommu_fwspec_get() for !CONFIG_IOMMU_API Joerg Roedel
2020-03-20  9:14 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] ACPI/IORT: Remove direct access of dev->iommu_fwspec Joerg Roedel
2020-03-20  9:14 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] drm/msm/mdp5: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-20  9:14 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] iommu/tegra-gart: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-20  9:14 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] iommu: Rename struct iommu_param to dev_iommu Joerg Roedel
2020-03-20  9:14 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] iommu: Move iommu_fwspec to struct dev_iommu Joerg Roedel
2020-03-20  9:14 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] iommu/arm-smmu: Fix uninitilized variable warning Joerg Roedel
2020-03-20  9:14 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] iommu: Introduce accessors for iommu private data Joerg Roedel
2020-03-20  9:14 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use accessor functions " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-20  9:14 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2020-03-23 16:02   ` [PATCH v3 10/15] iommu/arm-smmu: " Robin Murphy
2020-03-24 10:08     ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-25 12:31       ` Robin Murphy
2020-03-26 15:08         ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-20  9:14 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] iommu/renesas: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-20  9:14 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] iommu/mediatek: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-20  9:14 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] iommu/qcom: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-20  9:14 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] iommu/virtio: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-20  9:14 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] iommu: Move fwspec->iommu_priv to struct dev_iommu Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200320091414.3941-11-joro@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).