From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: mdalam@codeaurora.org
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, sricharan@codeaurora.org,
mdalam=codeaurora.org@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Add LOCK and UNLOCK flag bit support
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 11:28:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210115055806.GE2771@vkoul-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3cf7c4fc02c54d17fd2fd213f39005b@codeaurora.org>
On 14-01-21, 01:20, mdalam@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2021-01-12 15:40, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 12-01-21, 15:01, mdalam@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > > On 2020-12-21 23:03, mdalam@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > > > On 2020-12-21 14:53, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > On 17-12-20, 20:07, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
> > > > > > This change will add support for LOCK & UNLOCK flag bit support
> > > > > > on CMD descriptor.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If DMA_PREP_LOCK flag passed in prep_slave_sg then requester of this
> > > > > > transaction wanted to lock the DMA controller for this transaction so
> > > > > > BAM driver should set LOCK bit for the HW descriptor.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If DMA_PREP_UNLOCK flag passed in prep_slave_sg then requester
> > > > > > of this
> > > > > > transaction wanted to unlock the DMA controller.so BAM driver
> > > > > > should set
> > > > > > UNLOCK bit for the HW descriptor.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you explain why would we need to first lock and then unlock..? How
> > > > > would this be used in real world.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have read a bit of documentation but is unclear to me. Also should
> > > > > this be exposed as an API to users, sounds like internal to driver..?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > IPQ5018 SoC having only one Crypto Hardware Engine. This Crypto Hardware
> > > > Engine
> > > > will be shared between A53 core & ubi32 core. There is two separate
> > > > driver dedicated
> > > > to A53 core and ubi32 core. So to use Crypto Hardware Engine
> > > > parallelly for encryption/description
> > > > we need bam locking mechanism. if one driver will submit the request
> > > > for encryption/description
> > > > to Crypto then first it has to set LOCK flag bit on command descriptor
> > > > so that other pipes will
> > > > get locked.
> > > >
> > > > The Pipe Locking/Unlocking will be only on command-descriptor. Upon
> > > > encountering a command descriptor
> >
> > Can you explain what is a cmd descriptor?
>
> In BAM pipe descriptor structure there is a field called CMD (Command
> descriptor).
> CMD allows the SW to create descriptors of type Command which does not
> generate any data transmissions
> but configures registers in the Peripheral (write operations, and read
> registers operations ).
> Using command descriptor enables the SW to queue new configurations
> between data transfers in advance.
What and when is the CMD descriptor used for..?
> >
> > > > with LOCK bit set, The BAM will lock all other pipes not related to
> > > > the current pipe group, and keep
> > > > handling the current pipe only until it sees the UNLOCK set then it
> > > > will release all locked pipes.
> > > > locked pipe will not fetch new descriptors even if it got event/events
> > > > adding more descriptors for
> > > > this pipe (locked pipe).
> > > >
> > > > No need to expose as an API to user because its internal to driver, so
> > > > while preparing command descriptor
> > > > just we have to update the LOCK/UNLOCK flag.
> >
> > So IIUC, no api right? it would be internal to driver..?
>
> Yes its totally internal to deriver.
So no need for this patch then, right?
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-15 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-17 14:37 [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Add LOCK and UNLOCK flag bit support Md Sadre Alam
2020-12-19 3:35 ` Thara Gopinath
2020-12-21 7:35 ` mdalam
2020-12-21 18:09 ` Thara Gopinath
2020-12-22 12:18 ` mdalam
2021-01-12 9:30 ` mdalam
2020-12-21 9:23 ` Vinod Koul
2020-12-21 17:33 ` mdalam
2021-01-12 9:31 ` mdalam
2021-01-12 10:10 ` Vinod Koul
2021-01-13 19:50 ` mdalam
2021-01-15 5:58 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2021-01-18 3:51 ` mdalam
2021-01-19 16:45 ` Vinod Koul
2021-01-27 18:26 ` mdalam
2021-02-01 6:05 ` Vinod Koul
2021-02-01 6:22 ` mdalam
2021-02-01 6:43 ` Vinod Koul
2021-02-01 15:50 ` mdalam
2021-02-09 16:39 ` mdalam
2021-02-09 17:35 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-02-11 4:01 ` mdalam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210115055806.GE2771@vkoul-mobl \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdalam=codeaurora.org@codeaurora.org \
--cc=mdalam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).