linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [bug report] firmware: qcom_scm: Make __qcom_scm_is_call_available() return bool
@ 2021-10-11  9:20 Dan Carpenter
  2021-10-11 18:40 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2021-10-11  9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: swboyd; +Cc: linux-arm-msm

Hello Stephen Boyd,

The patch 9d11af8b06a8: "firmware: qcom_scm: Make
__qcom_scm_is_call_available() return bool" from Feb 23, 2021, leads
to the following Smatch static checker warning:

	drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c:255 __qcom_scm_is_call_available()
	warn: signedness bug returning '(-22)'

drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
    232 static bool __qcom_scm_is_call_available(struct device *dev, u32 svc_id,
    233                                          u32 cmd_id)
    234 {
    235         int ret;
    236         struct qcom_scm_desc desc = {
    237                 .svc = QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO,
    238                 .cmd = QCOM_SCM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL,
    239                 .owner = ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP,
    240         };
    241         struct qcom_scm_res res;
    242 
    243         desc.arginfo = QCOM_SCM_ARGS(1);
    244         switch (__get_convention()) {
    245         case SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32:
    246         case SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_64:
    247                 desc.args[0] = SCM_SMC_FNID(svc_id, cmd_id) |
    248                                 (ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP << ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SHIFT);
    249                 break;
    250         case SMC_CONVENTION_LEGACY:
    251                 desc.args[0] = SCM_LEGACY_FNID(svc_id, cmd_id);
    252                 break;
    253         default:
    254                 pr_err("Unknown SMC convention being used\n");
--> 255                 return -EINVAL;

Presumably this should be "return false;"?

    256         }
    257 
    258         ret = qcom_scm_call(dev, &desc, &res);
    259 
    260         return ret ? false : !!res.result[0];
    261 }

regards,
dan carpenter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [bug report] firmware: qcom_scm: Make __qcom_scm_is_call_available() return bool
  2021-10-11  9:20 [bug report] firmware: qcom_scm: Make __qcom_scm_is_call_available() return bool Dan Carpenter
@ 2021-10-11 18:40 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
  2021-10-11 19:06   ` Stephen Boyd
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guru Das Srinagesh @ 2021-10-11 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter; +Cc: swboyd, linux-arm-msm

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:20:54PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Stephen Boyd,
> 
> The patch 9d11af8b06a8: "firmware: qcom_scm: Make
> __qcom_scm_is_call_available() return bool" from Feb 23, 2021, leads
> to the following Smatch static checker warning:
> 
> 	drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c:255 __qcom_scm_is_call_available()
> 	warn: signedness bug returning '(-22)'
> 
> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
>     232 static bool __qcom_scm_is_call_available(struct device *dev, u32 svc_id,
>     233                                          u32 cmd_id)
>     234 {
>     235         int ret;
>     236         struct qcom_scm_desc desc = {
>     237                 .svc = QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO,
>     238                 .cmd = QCOM_SCM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL,
>     239                 .owner = ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP,
>     240         };
>     241         struct qcom_scm_res res;
>     242 
>     243         desc.arginfo = QCOM_SCM_ARGS(1);
>     244         switch (__get_convention()) {
>     245         case SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32:
>     246         case SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_64:
>     247                 desc.args[0] = SCM_SMC_FNID(svc_id, cmd_id) |
>     248                                 (ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP << ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SHIFT);
>     249                 break;
>     250         case SMC_CONVENTION_LEGACY:
>     251                 desc.args[0] = SCM_LEGACY_FNID(svc_id, cmd_id);
>     252                 break;
>     253         default:
>     254                 pr_err("Unknown SMC convention being used\n");
> --> 255                 return -EINVAL;
> 
> Presumably this should be "return false;"?
> 
>     256         }
>     257 
>     258         ret = qcom_scm_call(dev, &desc, &res);
>     259 
>     260         return ret ? false : !!res.result[0];
>     261 }
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter

Hi Dan, Stephen,

Please find the fix below:


From 8bbdb1517c3f58b6b29d0915424b9b0e03752e14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:18:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] firmware: qcom_scm: Fix error retval in
 __qcom_scm_is_call_available()

Since __qcom_scm_is_call_available() returns bool, have it return false
instead of -EINVAL if an invalid SMC convention is detected.

This fixes the Smatch static checker warning:

	drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c:255 __qcom_scm_is_call_available()
	warn: signedness bug returning '(-22)'

Fixes: 9d11af8b06a8 ("firmware: qcom_scm: Make __qcom_scm_is_call_available() return bool")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@quicinc.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
index 2ee97ba..27a64de 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static bool __qcom_scm_is_call_available(struct device *dev, u32 svc_id,
 		break;
 	default:
 		pr_err("Unknown SMC convention being used\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return false;
 	}
 
 	ret = qcom_scm_call(dev, &desc, &res);
-- 
2.7.4


Thank you.

Guru Das.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [bug report] firmware: qcom_scm: Make __qcom_scm_is_call_available() return bool
  2021-10-11 18:40 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
@ 2021-10-11 19:06   ` Stephen Boyd
  2021-10-11 20:10     ` Guru Das Srinagesh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2021-10-11 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter, Guru Das Srinagesh; +Cc: linux-arm-msm

Quoting Guru Das Srinagesh (2021-10-11 11:40:22)
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:20:54PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Hello Stephen Boyd,
> >
> > The patch 9d11af8b06a8: "firmware: qcom_scm: Make
> > __qcom_scm_is_call_available() return bool" from Feb 23, 2021, leads
> > to the following Smatch static checker warning:
> >
> >       drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c:255 __qcom_scm_is_call_available()
> >       warn: signedness bug returning '(-22)'
> >
> > drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> >     232 static bool __qcom_scm_is_call_available(struct device *dev, u32 svc_id,
> >     233                                          u32 cmd_id)
> >     234 {
> >     235         int ret;
> >     236         struct qcom_scm_desc desc = {
> >     237                 .svc = QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO,
> >     238                 .cmd = QCOM_SCM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL,
> >     239                 .owner = ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP,
> >     240         };
> >     241         struct qcom_scm_res res;
> >     242
> >     243         desc.arginfo = QCOM_SCM_ARGS(1);
> >     244         switch (__get_convention()) {
> >     245         case SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32:
> >     246         case SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_64:
> >     247                 desc.args[0] = SCM_SMC_FNID(svc_id, cmd_id) |
> >     248                                 (ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP << ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SHIFT);
> >     249                 break;
> >     250         case SMC_CONVENTION_LEGACY:
> >     251                 desc.args[0] = SCM_LEGACY_FNID(svc_id, cmd_id);
> >     252                 break;
> >     253         default:
> >     254                 pr_err("Unknown SMC convention being used\n");
> > --> 255                 return -EINVAL;
> >
> > Presumably this should be "return false;"?
> >
> >     256         }
> >     257
> >     258         ret = qcom_scm_call(dev, &desc, &res);
> >     259
> >     260         return ret ? false : !!res.result[0];
> >     261 }
> >
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
>
> Hi Dan, Stephen,
>
> Please find the fix below:
>
>
> From 8bbdb1517c3f58b6b29d0915424b9b0e03752e14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@quicinc.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:18:06 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] firmware: qcom_scm: Fix error retval in
>  __qcom_scm_is_call_available()
>
> Since __qcom_scm_is_call_available() returns bool, have it return false
> instead of -EINVAL if an invalid SMC convention is detected.
>
> This fixes the Smatch static checker warning:
>
>         drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c:255 __qcom_scm_is_call_available()
>         warn: signedness bug returning '(-22)'
>
> Fixes: 9d11af8b06a8 ("firmware: qcom_scm: Make __qcom_scm_is_call_available() return bool")
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@quicinc.com>
> ---

Resend as a proper patch?

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [bug report] firmware: qcom_scm: Make __qcom_scm_is_call_available() return bool
  2021-10-11 19:06   ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2021-10-11 20:10     ` Guru Das Srinagesh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guru Das Srinagesh @ 2021-10-11 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Boyd; +Cc: Dan Carpenter, linux-arm-msm

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:06:13PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Resend as a proper patch?
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>

Done: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1633982414-28347-1-git-send-email-quic_gurus@quicinc.com/

Thank you.

Guru Das.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-11 20:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-11  9:20 [bug report] firmware: qcom_scm: Make __qcom_scm_is_call_available() return bool Dan Carpenter
2021-10-11 18:40 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2021-10-11 19:06   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-10-11 20:10     ` Guru Das Srinagesh

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).