linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
To: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
	Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht,
	phone-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add configuration for PMI8950 peripheral
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 17:19:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2656622.mvXUDI8C0e@g550jk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221202093658.vg6t2ptar2arh7hn@SoMainline.org>

On Freitag, 2. Dezember 2022 10:36:58 CET Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2022-11-06 20:37:24, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > On 2022-11-05 00:44:37, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > > On 2022-11-01 17:18:00, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > > > From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com>
> > > > 
> > > > The PMI8950 features integrated peripherals like ADC, GPIO controller,
> > > > MPPs and others.
> > > > 
> > > > [luca@z3ntu.xyz: remove pm8950, style changes for 2022 standards, add
> > > > wled]
> > > > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes since v2:
> > > > * Pick up patch, and adjust as mentioned above sign-offs
> > > > 
> > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmi8950.dtsi | 97
> > > >  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 97 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmi8950.dtsi
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmi8950.dtsi
> > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmi8950.dtsi new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..32d27e2187e3
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmi8950.dtsi
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > +// Copyright (c) 2019, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com>
> > > > +
> > > > +#include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-vadc.h>
> > > > +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > > > +#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
> > > > +
> > > > +&spmi_bus {
> > > > +	pmic@2 {
> > > > +		compatible = "qcom,pmi8950", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
> > > > +		reg = <0x2 SPMI_USID>;
> > > > +		#address-cells = <1>;
> > > > +		#size-cells = <0>;
> > > > +
> > > > +		pmi8950_vadc: adc@3100 {
> > > > +			compatible = "qcom,spmi-vadc";
> > > > +			reg = <0x3100>;
> > > > +			interrupts = <0x2 0x31 0x0 
IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > > +			#address-cells = <1>;
> > > > +			#size-cells = <0>;
> > > > +			#io-channel-cells = <1>;
> > > > +
> > > > +			adc-chan@0 {
> > > > +				reg = <VADC_USBIN>;
> > > > +				qcom,pre-scaling = <1 4>;
> > > > +				label = "usbin";
> > > 
> > > I've previously sent a patch with labels in the node name instead [1],
> > > what's the preferred way nowadays?
> > > 
> > > [1]:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220926190148.283805-4-marijn.su
> > > ijten@somainline.org/> 
> > As it turns out that patch relied on the ADC5 driver propagating the DT
> > node name (and label name if set) to IIO, which doesn't happen for the
> > legacy VADC driver used here.  I sent an RFC to that effect, with a
> > large discussion whether or not we should use node names, labels, or
> > rely on hardcoded names in the drivers entirely.  The recent migration
> > to fwnode made the node name include the `@xx` suffix which makes for
> > unpleasant reading in sysfs, so that's at least one reason to have
> > generic node names *and skip node names in these drivers altogether*.
> > 
> >     https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221106193018.270106-1-marijn.s
> >     uijten@somainline.org/T/#u> 
> > In short: we may want to hold off changing these patches until a
> > clear-cut decision has been made (but I think your patch here is the
> > right approach in the end: generic node name *with label*, when the
> > label is more clear than the name hardcoded in the driver).
> 
> We came to the conclusion in [1] that using labels is the way to go so
> that the name doesn't get all mangled, then we can opt for generic node
> names here as well.  This does mean I'll have to send a followup for [2]
> and have to revise [3] again to use generic node names and labels.

So the way this patch does it is good or does it need changes?

> 
> - Marijn
> 
> [1]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221112162719.0ac87998@jic23-huawei/
> [2]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220926190148.283805-4-marijn.suijte
> n@somainline.org/ [3]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221111120156.48040-10-angelogioacch
> ino.delregno@collabora.com/





  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-04 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-01 16:17 [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: backlight: qcom-wled: Add PMI8950 compatible Luca Weiss
2022-11-01 16:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add configuration for PMI8950 peripheral Luca Weiss
2022-11-04 23:44   ` Marijn Suijten
2022-11-06 19:37     ` Marijn Suijten
2022-12-02  9:36       ` Marijn Suijten
2022-12-04 16:19         ` Luca Weiss [this message]
2022-12-08 10:12           ` Marijn Suijten
2022-12-08 10:23             ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-08 11:20               ` Marijn Suijten
2022-12-09 16:54                 ` Luca Weiss
2022-12-09 20:38                   ` Marijn Suijten
2022-12-10 10:58                     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-10 16:31                       ` Marijn Suijten
2022-12-11 20:11                         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-14 20:39                           ` Marijn Suijten
2022-11-02 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: backlight: qcom-wled: Add PMI8950 compatible Daniel Thompson
2022-11-02 17:29 ` Rob Herring
2022-11-07  9:19 ` Lee Jones
2022-12-06 18:19 ` (subset) " Bjorn Andersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2656622.mvXUDI8C0e@g550jk \
    --to=luca@z3ntu.xyz \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kholk11@gmail.com \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
    --cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).