From: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@linaro.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@codeaurora.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Jordan Crouse <jordan@cosmicpenguin.net>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>,
Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Sharat Masetty <smasetty@codeaurora.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Disable frequency clamping on a630
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 15:32:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8aa590be-6a9f-9343-e897-18e86ea48202@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGv0WWB3Z1hmXf8vxm1_-d7fsNBRcaQF35aE2JXcJn8-cA@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/08/2021 21:04, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 12:21 PM Caleb Connolly
> <caleb.connolly@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob, Akhil,
>>
>> On 29/07/2021 21:53, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 1:28 PM Caleb Connolly
>>> <caleb.connolly@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 29/07/2021 21:24, Rob Clark wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 1:06 PM Caleb Connolly
>>>>> <caleb.connolly@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've done some more testing! It looks like before that patch ("drm/msm: Devfreq tuning") the GPU would never get above
>>>>>> the second frequency in the OPP table (342MHz) (at least, not in glxgears). With the patch applied it would more
>>>>>> aggressively jump up to the max frequency which seems to be unstable at the default regulator voltages.
>>>>>
>>>>> *ohh*, yeah, ok, that would explain it
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hacking the pm8005 s1 regulator (which provides VDD_GFX) up to 0.988v (instead of the stock 0.516v) makes the GPU stable
>>>>>> at the higher frequencies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Applying this patch reverts the behaviour, and the GPU never goes above 342MHz in glxgears, losing ~30% performance in
>>>>>> glxgear.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think (?) that enabling CPR support would be the proper solution to this - that would ensure that the regulators run
>>>>>> at the voltage the hardware needs to be stable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is hacking the voltage higher (although ideally not quite that high) an acceptable short term solution until we have
>>>>>> CPR? Or would it be safer to just not make use of the higher frequencies on a630 for now?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> tbh, I'm not sure about the regulator stuff and CPR.. Bjorn is already
>>>>> on CC and I added sboyd, maybe one of them knows better.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the short term, removing the higher problematic OPPs from dts might
>>>>> be a better option than this patch (which I'm dropping), since there
>>>>> is nothing stopping other workloads from hitting higher OPPs.
>>>> Oh yeah that sounds like a more sensible workaround than mine .
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm slightly curious why I didn't have problems at higher OPPs on my
>>>>> c630 laptop (sdm850)
>>>> Perhaps you won the sillicon lottery - iirc sdm850 is binned for higher clocks as is out of the factory.
>>>>
>>>> Would it be best to drop the OPPs for all devices? Or just those affected? I guess it's possible another c630 might
>>>> crash where yours doesn't?
>>>
>>> I've not heard any reports of similar issues from the handful of other
>>> folks with c630's on #aarch64-laptops.. but I can't really say if that
>>> is luck or not.
>> It looks like this affects at least the OnePlus 6 and PocoPhone F1, I've done some more poking and the following diff
>> seems to fix the stability issues completely, it seems the delay is required to let the update propagate.
>>
>> This doesn't feel like the right fix, but hopefully it's enough to come up with a better solution than disabling the new
>> devfreq behaviour on a630.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> index d7cec7f0dde0..69e2a5e84dae 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> @@ -139,6 +139,10 @@ void a6xx_gmu_set_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> + dev_pm_opp_set_opp(&gpu->pdev->dev, opp);
>> +
>> + usleep_range(300, 500);
>> +
>
> Hmm, this is going to be in the critical path on idle -> active
> transition (ie. think response time to user-input).. so we defn don't
> want to do this unconditionally..
>
> If I understand the problem, we just want to limit how far we jump the
> gpu freq in one go.. maybe deleting the lowest (and perhaps highest)
> OPP would accomplish that? Could that be done in the board(s)'s
> toplevel dts files?
That would be a workaround, however I'd really like to avoid limiting performance as a solution if I can help it,
especially as the fix might just be "set the opp first, wait for it to apply, then set the core clock".
Is there a sensible way to get a callback from the opp notify chain? Or from rpmh directly? Or is this solution really
not the right way to go?
>
> BR,
> -R
>
>> gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_DCVS_ACK_OPTION, 0);
>>
>> gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_DCVS_PERF_SETTING,
>> @@ -158,7 +162,6 @@ void a6xx_gmu_set_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
>> if (ret)
>> dev_err(gmu->dev, "GMU set GPU frequency error: %d\n", ret);
>>
>> - dev_pm_opp_set_opp(&gpu->pdev->dev, opp);
>> pm_runtime_put(gmu->dev);
>> }
>>>
>>> Maybe just remove it for affected devices? But I'll defer to Bjorn.
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> -R
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Kind Regards,
>> Caleb (they/them)
--
Kind Regards,
Caleb (they/them)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-08 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-29 18:39 [PATCH] drm/msm: Disable frequency clamping on a630 Rob Clark
2021-07-29 20:06 ` Caleb Connolly
2021-07-29 20:24 ` Rob Clark
2021-07-29 20:28 ` Caleb Connolly
2021-07-29 20:53 ` Rob Clark
2021-08-07 19:21 ` Caleb Connolly
2021-08-07 20:04 ` Rob Clark
2021-08-08 14:32 ` Caleb Connolly [this message]
2021-08-08 16:52 ` Rob Clark
2021-08-09 14:51 ` Akhil P Oommen
2021-08-09 16:12 ` Rob Clark
2021-08-09 16:18 ` Caleb Connolly
2021-08-09 17:26 ` Akhil P Oommen
2021-08-09 17:58 ` Rob Clark
2021-08-09 20:35 ` Caleb Connolly
2021-08-09 21:08 ` Rob Clark
2021-09-07 15:43 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-09-08 2:21 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-09-08 13:49 ` Caleb Connolly
2021-09-09 12:17 ` Amit Pundir
2021-09-09 16:12 ` Amit Pundir
2021-09-09 19:49 ` Akhil P Oommen
2021-09-09 20:54 ` Rob Clark
2021-09-10 17:22 ` Rob Clark
2021-09-10 17:18 ` Rob Clark
2021-09-10 17:34 ` Caleb Connolly
2021-09-13 6:15 ` Akhil P Oommen
2021-09-03 19:39 ` John Stultz
2021-09-03 20:29 ` Rob Clark
2021-09-06 8:01 ` Amit Pundir
2021-09-06 16:28 ` Rob Clark
2021-09-06 19:58 ` Amit Pundir
2021-09-06 20:50 ` Rob Clark
2021-09-06 21:27 ` Rob Clark
2021-09-07 8:18 ` Amit Pundir
2021-09-07 1:45 ` Rob Clark
2021-09-07 8:25 ` Amit Pundir
2021-09-07 14:25 ` Rob Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8aa590be-6a9f-9343-e897-18e86ea48202@linaro.org \
--to=caleb.connolly@linaro.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=akhilpo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jonathan@marek.ca \
--cc=jordan@cosmicpenguin.net \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=smasetty@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).