Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: arm64: ipq9574: Add binding descriptions for clock and reset

From: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@quicinc.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: <tdas@codeaurora.org>, <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>,
	<dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>, <quic_gokulsri@quicinc.com>,
	<nfraprado@collabora.com>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<quic_poovendh@quicinc.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<andersson@kernel.org>, <arnd@arndb.de>, <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	<broonie@kernel.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<quic_sjaganat@quicinc.com>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	<linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>,
	<linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>,
	<linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	<mturquette@baylibre.com>, <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<quic_arajkuma@quicinc.com>, <quic_anusha@quicinc.com>,
	<agross@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: arm64: ipq9574: Add binding descriptions for clock and reset
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 17:54:22 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <90484f63-bd72-f3a4-b1c5-d3830c2245d0@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <167335661700.1967953.6789968437095688240.robh@kernel.org>


On 1/10/2023 6:59 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:43:10 +0530, devi priya wrote:
>> Adding support for the global clock controller found on
>> IPQ9574 based devices
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: devi priya <quic_devipriy@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-other.yaml        |   4 +
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml   |   9 +-
>>   include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq9574.h  | 226 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/dt-bindings/reset/qcom,gcc-ipq9574.h  | 164 +++++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 402 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>   create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq9574.h
>>   create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/qcom,gcc-ipq9574.h
>>
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8550-gcc.example.dtb: clock-controller@100000: clocks: [[4294967295, 0], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295, 0], [4294967295, 1], [4294967295, 2], [4294967295]] is too long
> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8550-gcc.yaml
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8550-gcc.example.dtb: clock-controller@100000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('#clock-cells', '#power-domain-cells', '#reset-cells', 'reg' were unexpected)
> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8550-gcc.yaml
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc8280xp.example.dtb: clock-controller@100000: clocks: [[4294967295, 0], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295]] is too long
> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc8280xp.yaml
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc8280xp.example.dtb: clock-controller@100000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('#clock-cells', '#power-domain-cells', '#reset-cells', 'reg' were unexpected)
> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc8280xp.yaml
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7280.example.dtb: clock-controller@100000: clocks: [[4294967295, 0], [4294967295, 1], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295], [4294967295]] is too long
> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7280.yaml
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7280.example.dtb: clock-controller@100000: clock-names: ['bi_tcxo', 'bi_tcxo_ao', 'sleep_clk', 'pcie_0_pipe_clk', 'pcie_1_pipe_clk', 'ufs_phy_rx_symbol_0_clk', 'ufs_phy_rx_symbol_1_clk', 'ufs_phy_tx_symbol_0_clk', 'usb3_phy_wrapper_gcc_usb30_pipe_clk'] is too long
> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7280.yaml
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7280.example.dtb: clock-controller@100000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('#clock-cells', '#power-domain-cells', '#reset-cells', 'reg' were unexpected)
> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7280.yaml
> 
> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> 
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20230110121316.24892-2-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com
> 
> The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
> should be noted in *this* patch.
> 
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> date:
> 
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
> 
> Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
> that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
> your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
> 
Sure, will check

Best Regards,
Devi Priya