From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/10] PCI: qcom: Fix higher MSI vectors handling
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 17:11:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yn51EsPE8Ulqvbva@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8f13d1e4-eaca-a8ef-510a-6b2e039612d6@linaro.org>
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 04:50:11PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 13/05/2022 15:52, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 01:10:44PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >> On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 12:36, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Are you able to confirm that all sc8280xp systems have only four msi
> > IRQs?
>
> Unfortunately no. I don't have access to the sc8280xp docs. Let's see if
> BjornA can confirm this.
I just talked to Bjorn and he said they should be the same for all
sc8280xp, but of course there are complications like some of the
controllers actually having more than 4 interrupts (even if they may not
be usable).
Probably best to describe this in DT.
> > This seems like another case of using the kernel as a DT validator by
> > describing things in two places and making sure that they match.
>
> Yep, this seems like a bad habit of mine: to distrust the DT.
>
> >
> > I assume the number of vectors will always be a multiple of the numbers
> > of msi IRQs. Right? Then we don't need to encode this number for every
> > supported platform in the corresponding PCIe driver even if we end up
> > describing it in the binding.
>
> But it was your suggestion!
Heh. But with the caveat that I'd still prefer this to come from DT if
possible. :)
> Let's drop the warning then, parse what was passed by the DT and just
> print the total amount of MSI IRQs.
Perfect, thanks!
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-13 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-12 10:45 [PATCH v8 00/10] PCI: qcom: Fix higher MSI vectors handling Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-12 10:45 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] PCI: qcom: Revert "PCI: qcom: Add support for handling MSIs from 8 endpoints" Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-12 18:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-12 10:45 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] PCI: dwc: Correct msi_irq condition in dw_pcie_free_msi() Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-12 10:45 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] PCI: dwc: Convert msi_irq to the array Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-12 10:45 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] PCI: dwc: Propagate error from dma_mapping_error() Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-12 10:45 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] PCI: dwc: split MSI IRQ parsing/allocation to a separate function Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-12 18:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-12 10:45 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] PCI: dwc: Handle MSIs routed to multiple GIC interrupts Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-12 18:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-13 11:52 ` Johan Hovold
2022-05-13 12:19 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-13 12:33 ` Johan Hovold
2022-05-12 10:45 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] PCI: qcom: " Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-13 12:42 ` Johan Hovold
2022-05-13 12:48 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-13 12:57 ` Johan Hovold
2022-05-12 10:45 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] PCI: dwc: Implement special ISR handler for split MSI IRQ setup Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-12 10:45 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Support additional MSI interrupts Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-12 10:45 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: provide " Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-13 11:54 ` Johan Hovold
2022-05-13 12:24 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-13 8:58 ` [PATCH v8 00/10] PCI: qcom: Fix higher MSI vectors handling Johan Hovold
2022-05-13 9:28 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-13 9:36 ` Johan Hovold
2022-05-13 10:10 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-13 12:52 ` Johan Hovold
2022-05-13 13:50 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-13 15:11 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2022-05-13 12:39 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-13 13:08 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-13 13:17 ` Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yn51EsPE8Ulqvbva@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=svarbanov@mm-sol.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).