* [PATCH 0/3] Add pin control support for lpass sc7280
@ 2021-10-07 13:48 Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu
2021-10-07 13:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: qcom: Update lpass variant independent functions as generic Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu @ 2021-10-07 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: agross, bjorn.andersson, lgirdwood, broonie, robh+dt, plai,
bgoswami, perex, tiwai, srinivas.kandagatla, rohitkr,
linux-arm-msm, alsa-devel, devicetree, linux-kernel, swboyd,
judyhsiao
Cc: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu
This patch series is to make lpass variant independent pin control
functions common and to add lpass sc7280 pincontrol support.
It also includes dt-bindings for lpass sc7280 lpi compatible.
Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (3):
pinctrl: qcom: Update lpass variant independent functions as generic
dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add sc7280 lpass lpi pinctrl compatible
pinctrl: qcom: Add SC7280 lpass pin configuration
.../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 4 +-
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.,
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: qcom: Update lpass variant independent functions as generic 2021-10-07 13:48 [PATCH 0/3] Add pin control support for lpass sc7280 Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu @ 2021-10-07 13:48 ` Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-07 17:57 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-10-07 13:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add sc7280 lpass lpi pinctrl compatible Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-07 13:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SC7280 lpass pin configuration Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu @ 2021-10-07 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: agross, bjorn.andersson, lgirdwood, broonie, robh+dt, plai, bgoswami, perex, tiwai, srinivas.kandagatla, rohitkr, linux-arm-msm, alsa-devel, devicetree, linux-kernel, swboyd, judyhsiao Cc: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu, Venkata Prasad Potturu Update pin control variable names to make common for all lpass varients. Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c index 2f19ab4..c0117c5 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ struct lpi_pinctrl { }; /* sm8250 variant specific data */ -static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc sm8250_lpi_pins[] = { +static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc lpass_lpi_pins[] = { PINCTRL_PIN(0, "gpio0"), PINCTRL_PIN(1, "gpio1"), PINCTRL_PIN(2, "gpio2"), @@ -124,7 +124,8 @@ static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc sm8250_lpi_pins[] = { PINCTRL_PIN(13, "gpio13"), }; -enum sm8250_lpi_functions { + +enum lpass_lpi_functions { LPI_MUX_dmic1_clk, LPI_MUX_dmic1_data, LPI_MUX_dmic2_clk, @@ -203,7 +204,7 @@ static const struct lpi_pingroup sm8250_groups[] = { LPI_PINGROUP(13, NO_SLEW, dmic3_data, i2s2_data, _, _), }; -static const struct lpi_function sm8250_functions[] = { +static const struct lpi_function lpass_functions[] = { LPI_FUNCTION(dmic1_clk), LPI_FUNCTION(dmic1_data), LPI_FUNCTION(dmic2_clk), @@ -228,12 +229,12 @@ static const struct lpi_function sm8250_functions[] = { }; static struct lpi_pinctrl_variant_data sm8250_lpi_data = { - .pins = sm8250_lpi_pins, - .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8250_lpi_pins), + .pins = lpass_lpi_pins, + .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(lpass_lpi_pins), .groups = sm8250_groups, .ngroups = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8250_groups), - .functions = sm8250_functions, - .nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8250_functions), + .functions = lpass_functions, + .nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(lpass_functions), }; static int lpi_gpio_read(struct lpi_pinctrl *state, unsigned int pin, @@ -615,7 +616,7 @@ static int lpi_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pctrl->slew_base), "Slew resource not provided\n"); - ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, MAX_LPI_NUM_CLKS, pctrl->clks); + ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_optional(dev, MAX_LPI_NUM_CLKS, pctrl->clks); if (ret) return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Can't get clocks\n"); -- Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: qcom: Update lpass variant independent functions as generic 2021-10-07 13:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: qcom: Update lpass variant independent functions as generic Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu @ 2021-10-07 17:57 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-10-27 7:42 ` Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Stephen Boyd @ 2021-10-07 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu, agross, alsa-devel, bgoswami, bjorn.andersson, broonie, devicetree, judyhsiao, lgirdwood, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel, perex, plai, robh+dt, rohitkr, srinivas.kandagatla, tiwai Cc: Venkata Prasad Potturu Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-10-07 06:48:37) > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c > index 2f19ab4..c0117c5 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c > @@ -124,7 +124,8 @@ static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc sm8250_lpi_pins[] = { > PINCTRL_PIN(13, "gpio13"), > }; > > -enum sm8250_lpi_functions { > + Please drop this extra newline so the diff makes sense. > +enum lpass_lpi_functions { > LPI_MUX_dmic1_clk, > LPI_MUX_dmic1_data, > LPI_MUX_dmic2_clk, > @@ -203,7 +204,7 @@ static const struct lpi_pingroup sm8250_groups[] = { > LPI_PINGROUP(13, NO_SLEW, dmic3_data, i2s2_data, _, _), > }; > > -static const struct lpi_function sm8250_functions[] = { > +static const struct lpi_function lpass_functions[] = { Why not follow the approach of other qcom pinctrl drivers and make a core driver that each SoC uses as a library? > LPI_FUNCTION(dmic1_clk), > LPI_FUNCTION(dmic1_data), > LPI_FUNCTION(dmic2_clk), > @@ -615,7 +616,7 @@ static int lpi_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pctrl->slew_base), > "Slew resource not provided\n"); > > - ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, MAX_LPI_NUM_CLKS, pctrl->clks); > + ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_optional(dev, MAX_LPI_NUM_CLKS, pctrl->clks); Please mention in the commit text why this is now optional. > if (ret) > return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Can't get clocks\n"); > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: qcom: Update lpass variant independent functions as generic 2021-10-07 17:57 ` Stephen Boyd @ 2021-10-27 7:42 ` Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu @ 2021-10-27 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Boyd, agross, alsa-devel, bgoswami, bjorn.andersson, broonie, devicetree, judyhsiao, lgirdwood, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel, perex, plai, robh+dt, rohitkr, srinivas.kandagatla, tiwai Cc: Venkata Prasad Potturu On 10/7/2021 11:27 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: Thanks for Your Time Stephen!!! > Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-10-07 06:48:37) >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c >> index 2f19ab4..c0117c5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c >> @@ -124,7 +124,8 @@ static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc sm8250_lpi_pins[] = { >> PINCTRL_PIN(13, "gpio13"), >> }; >> >> -enum sm8250_lpi_functions { >> + > Please drop this extra newline so the diff makes sense. Okay. >> +enum lpass_lpi_functions { >> LPI_MUX_dmic1_clk, >> LPI_MUX_dmic1_data, >> LPI_MUX_dmic2_clk, >> @@ -203,7 +204,7 @@ static const struct lpi_pingroup sm8250_groups[] = { >> LPI_PINGROUP(13, NO_SLEW, dmic3_data, i2s2_data, _, _), >> }; >> >> -static const struct lpi_function sm8250_functions[] = { >> +static const struct lpi_function lpass_functions[] = { > Why not follow the approach of other qcom pinctrl drivers and make a > core driver that each SoC uses as a library? Actually this driver is for lpass LPI pin control purpose. For this only 14 pins are there and mostly fixed for all platforms. So I feel for now this approach is fine. >> LPI_FUNCTION(dmic1_clk), >> LPI_FUNCTION(dmic1_data), >> LPI_FUNCTION(dmic2_clk), >> @@ -615,7 +616,7 @@ static int lpi_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pctrl->slew_base), >> "Slew resource not provided\n"); >> >> - ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, MAX_LPI_NUM_CLKS, pctrl->clks); >> + ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_optional(dev, MAX_LPI_NUM_CLKS, pctrl->clks); > Please mention in the commit text why this is now optional. Okay. will update commit message accordingly. > >> if (ret) >> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Can't get clocks\n"); >> -- Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add sc7280 lpass lpi pinctrl compatible 2021-10-07 13:48 [PATCH 0/3] Add pin control support for lpass sc7280 Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-07 13:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: qcom: Update lpass variant independent functions as generic Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu @ 2021-10-07 13:48 ` Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-07 17:59 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-10-08 2:46 ` Rob Herring 2021-10-07 13:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SC7280 lpass pin configuration Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu @ 2021-10-07 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: agross, bjorn.andersson, lgirdwood, broonie, robh+dt, plai, bgoswami, perex, tiwai, srinivas.kandagatla, rohitkr, linux-arm-msm, alsa-devel, devicetree, linux-kernel, swboyd, judyhsiao Cc: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu, Venkata Prasad Potturu Add device tree binding compatible name for Qualcomm SC7280 LPASS LPI pinctrl driver. Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.org> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml index e47ebf9..578b283 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ description: | properties: compatible: - const: qcom,sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl + enum: + - qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl + - qcom,sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl reg: minItems: 2 -- Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add sc7280 lpass lpi pinctrl compatible 2021-10-07 13:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add sc7280 lpass lpi pinctrl compatible Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu @ 2021-10-07 17:59 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-10-27 7:47 ` Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-08 2:46 ` Rob Herring 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Stephen Boyd @ 2021-10-07 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu, agross, alsa-devel, bgoswami, bjorn.andersson, broonie, devicetree, judyhsiao, lgirdwood, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel, perex, plai, robh+dt, rohitkr, srinivas.kandagatla, tiwai Cc: Venkata Prasad Potturu Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-10-07 06:48:38) > Add device tree binding compatible name for Qualcomm SC7280 LPASS LPI pinctrl driver. > > Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml > index e47ebf9..578b283 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml > @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ description: | > > properties: > compatible: > - const: qcom,sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl > + enum: > + - qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl > + - qcom,sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl I suspect we need to split the binding because the function list needs to change. Can you make a whole new file that's probably largely a copy of this file and/or extract the common bits into a meta schema and include that in both the files? Then the function list can be different and the clock property can be omitted in the sc7280 file. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add sc7280 lpass lpi pinctrl compatible 2021-10-07 17:59 ` Stephen Boyd @ 2021-10-27 7:47 ` Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-28 22:22 ` Stephen Boyd 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu @ 2021-10-27 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Boyd, agross, alsa-devel, bgoswami, bjorn.andersson, broonie, devicetree, judyhsiao, lgirdwood, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel, perex, plai, robh+dt, rohitkr, srinivas.kandagatla, tiwai Cc: Venkata Prasad Potturu On 10/7/2021 11:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-10-07 06:48:38) >> Add device tree binding compatible name for Qualcomm SC7280 LPASS LPI pinctrl driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml >> index e47ebf9..578b283 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml >> @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ description: | >> >> properties: >> compatible: >> - const: qcom,sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl >> + enum: >> + - qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl >> + - qcom,sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl > I suspect we need to split the binding because the function list needs > to change. Can you make a whole new file that's probably largely a copy > of this file and/or extract the common bits into a meta schema and > include that in both the files? Then the function list can be different > and the clock property can be omitted in the sc7280 file. As most are common functions and fixed number of LPASS Lpi pin configuration across platforms, Only diff is ADSP bypass platforms 2 clocks are optional. Otherwise clock design also same for SC7280 and SM8250 based architecture. So I feel Keeping common file is better for now. -- Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add sc7280 lpass lpi pinctrl compatible 2021-10-27 7:47 ` Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu @ 2021-10-28 22:22 ` Stephen Boyd 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Stephen Boyd @ 2021-10-28 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu, agross, alsa-devel, bgoswami, bjorn.andersson, broonie, devicetree, judyhsiao, lgirdwood, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel, perex, plai, robh+dt, rohitkr, srinivas.kandagatla, tiwai Cc: Venkata Prasad Potturu Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-10-27 00:47:52) > > On 10/7/2021 11:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-10-07 06:48:38) > >> Add device tree binding compatible name for Qualcomm SC7280 LPASS LPI pinctrl driver. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@codeaurora.org> > >> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.org> > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 4 +++- > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml > >> index e47ebf9..578b283 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml > >> @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ description: | > >> > >> properties: > >> compatible: > >> - const: qcom,sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl > >> + enum: > >> + - qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl > >> + - qcom,sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl > > I suspect we need to split the binding because the function list needs > > to change. Can you make a whole new file that's probably largely a copy > > of this file and/or extract the common bits into a meta schema and > > include that in both the files? Then the function list can be different > > and the clock property can be omitted in the sc7280 file. > > As most are common functions and fixed number of LPASS Lpi pin > configuration across platforms, > > Only diff is ADSP bypass platforms 2 clocks are optional. Otherwise > clock design also same for SC7280 and SM8250 based architecture. > > So I feel Keeping common file is better for now. I don't agree. We want to be very strict about what is exposed. It needs to match exactly what is supported on the SoC, not be a superset of it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add sc7280 lpass lpi pinctrl compatible 2021-10-07 13:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add sc7280 lpass lpi pinctrl compatible Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-07 17:59 ` Stephen Boyd @ 2021-10-08 2:46 ` Rob Herring 1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Rob Herring @ 2021-10-08 2:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu Cc: linux-kernel, bgoswami, perex, judyhsiao, plai, agross, broonie, Venkata Prasad Potturu, swboyd, linux-arm-msm, alsa-devel, devicetree, robh+dt, tiwai, srinivas.kandagatla, rohitkr, bjorn.andersson, lgirdwood On Thu, 07 Oct 2021 19:18:38 +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote: > Add device tree binding compatible name for Qualcomm SC7280 LPASS LPI pinctrl driver. > > Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is incorrect. These may not be new warnings. Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check. This will change in the future. Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1537726 pinctrl@33c0000: dmic01-active-pins: 'clk', 'data' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-hdk.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-mtp.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx203.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx206.dt.yaml pinctrl@33c0000: dmic01-active-pins: 'function' is a required property arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-hdk.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-mtp.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx203.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx206.dt.yaml pinctrl@33c0000: dmic01-active-pins: 'pins' is a required property arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-hdk.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-mtp.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx203.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx206.dt.yaml pinctrl@33c0000: dmic01-sleep-pins: 'clk', 'data' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-hdk.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-mtp.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx203.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx206.dt.yaml pinctrl@33c0000: dmic01-sleep-pins: 'function' is a required property arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-hdk.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-mtp.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx203.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx206.dt.yaml pinctrl@33c0000: dmic01-sleep-pins: 'pins' is a required property arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-hdk.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-mtp.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx203.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx206.dt.yaml pinctrl@33c0000: wsa-swr-active-pins: 'clk', 'data' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-hdk.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-mtp.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx203.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx206.dt.yaml pinctrl@33c0000: wsa-swr-active-pins: 'function' is a required property arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-hdk.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-mtp.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx203.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx206.dt.yaml pinctrl@33c0000: wsa-swr-active-pins: 'pins' is a required property arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-hdk.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-mtp.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx203.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx206.dt.yaml pinctrl@33c0000: wsa-swr-sleep-pins: 'clk', 'data' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-hdk.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-mtp.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx203.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx206.dt.yaml pinctrl@33c0000: wsa-swr-sleep-pins: 'function' is a required property arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-hdk.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-mtp.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx203.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx206.dt.yaml pinctrl@33c0000: wsa-swr-sleep-pins: 'pins' is a required property arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-hdk.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-mtp.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx203.dt.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250-sony-xperia-edo-pdx206.dt.yaml ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SC7280 lpass pin configuration 2021-10-07 13:48 [PATCH 0/3] Add pin control support for lpass sc7280 Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-07 13:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: qcom: Update lpass variant independent functions as generic Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-07 13:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add sc7280 lpass lpi pinctrl compatible Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu @ 2021-10-07 13:48 ` Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-07 17:54 ` Stephen Boyd 2 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu @ 2021-10-07 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: agross, bjorn.andersson, lgirdwood, broonie, robh+dt, plai, bgoswami, perex, tiwai, srinivas.kandagatla, rohitkr, linux-arm-msm, alsa-devel, devicetree, linux-kernel, swboyd, judyhsiao Cc: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu, Venkata Prasad Potturu Update pin control support for SC7280 LPASS LPI. Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c index c0117c5..0b68065 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc lpass_lpi_pins[] = { PINCTRL_PIN(11, "gpio11"), PINCTRL_PIN(12, "gpio12"), PINCTRL_PIN(13, "gpio13"), + PINCTRL_PIN(14, "gpio14"), }; @@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ enum lpass_lpi_functions { LPI_MUX_i2s1_ws, LPI_MUX_i2s2_clk, LPI_MUX_i2s2_data, + LPI_MUX_sc7280_i2s2_data, LPI_MUX_i2s2_ws, LPI_MUX_qua_mi2s_data, LPI_MUX_qua_mi2s_sclk, @@ -145,6 +147,7 @@ enum lpass_lpi_functions { LPI_MUX_swr_rx_data, LPI_MUX_swr_tx_clk, LPI_MUX_swr_tx_data, + LPI_MUX_sc7280_swr_tx_data, LPI_MUX_wsa_swr_clk, LPI_MUX_wsa_swr_data, LPI_MUX_gpio, @@ -165,8 +168,11 @@ static const unsigned int gpio10_pins[] = { 10 }; static const unsigned int gpio11_pins[] = { 11 }; static const unsigned int gpio12_pins[] = { 12 }; static const unsigned int gpio13_pins[] = { 13 }; +static const unsigned int gpio14_pins[] = { 14 }; + static const char * const swr_tx_clk_groups[] = { "gpio0" }; static const char * const swr_tx_data_groups[] = { "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio5" }; +static const char * const sc7280_swr_tx_data_groups[] = { "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio14" }; static const char * const swr_rx_clk_groups[] = { "gpio3" }; static const char * const swr_rx_data_groups[] = { "gpio4", "gpio5" }; static const char * const dmic1_clk_groups[] = { "gpio6" }; @@ -186,6 +192,7 @@ static const char * const i2s1_data_groups[] = { "gpio8", "gpio9" }; static const char * const wsa_swr_clk_groups[] = { "gpio10" }; static const char * const wsa_swr_data_groups[] = { "gpio11" }; static const char * const i2s2_data_groups[] = { "gpio12", "gpio12" }; +static const char * const sc7280_i2s2_data_groups[] = { "gpio12", "gpio13" }; static const struct lpi_pingroup sm8250_groups[] = { LPI_PINGROUP(0, 0, swr_tx_clk, qua_mi2s_sclk, _, _), @@ -204,6 +211,24 @@ static const struct lpi_pingroup sm8250_groups[] = { LPI_PINGROUP(13, NO_SLEW, dmic3_data, i2s2_data, _, _), }; +static const struct lpi_pingroup sc7280_groups[] = { + LPI_PINGROUP(0, 0, swr_tx_clk, qua_mi2s_sclk, _, _), + LPI_PINGROUP(1, 2, swr_tx_data, qua_mi2s_ws, _, _), + LPI_PINGROUP(2, 4, swr_tx_data, qua_mi2s_data, _, _), + LPI_PINGROUP(3, 8, swr_rx_clk, qua_mi2s_data, _, _), + LPI_PINGROUP(4, 10, swr_rx_data, qua_mi2s_data, _, _), + LPI_PINGROUP(5, 12, swr_rx_data, _, _, _), + LPI_PINGROUP(6, NO_SLEW, dmic1_clk, i2s1_clk, _, _), + LPI_PINGROUP(7, NO_SLEW, dmic1_data, i2s1_ws, _, _), + LPI_PINGROUP(8, NO_SLEW, dmic2_clk, i2s1_data, _, _), + LPI_PINGROUP(9, NO_SLEW, dmic2_data, i2s1_data, _, _), + LPI_PINGROUP(10, 16, i2s2_clk, wsa_swr_clk, _, _), + LPI_PINGROUP(11, 18, i2s2_ws, wsa_swr_data, _, _), + LPI_PINGROUP(12, NO_SLEW, dmic3_clk, sc7280_i2s2_data, _, _), + LPI_PINGROUP(13, NO_SLEW, dmic3_data, sc7280_i2s2_data, _, _), + LPI_PINGROUP(14, 6, sc7280_swr_tx_data, _, _, _), +}; + static const struct lpi_function lpass_functions[] = { LPI_FUNCTION(dmic1_clk), LPI_FUNCTION(dmic1_data), @@ -216,6 +241,7 @@ static const struct lpi_function lpass_functions[] = { LPI_FUNCTION(i2s1_ws), LPI_FUNCTION(i2s2_clk), LPI_FUNCTION(i2s2_data), + LPI_FUNCTION(sc7280_i2s2_data), LPI_FUNCTION(i2s2_ws), LPI_FUNCTION(qua_mi2s_data), LPI_FUNCTION(qua_mi2s_sclk), @@ -224,6 +250,7 @@ static const struct lpi_function lpass_functions[] = { LPI_FUNCTION(swr_rx_data), LPI_FUNCTION(swr_tx_clk), LPI_FUNCTION(swr_tx_data), + LPI_FUNCTION(sc7280_swr_tx_data), LPI_FUNCTION(wsa_swr_clk), LPI_FUNCTION(wsa_swr_data), }; @@ -237,6 +264,15 @@ static struct lpi_pinctrl_variant_data sm8250_lpi_data = { .nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(lpass_functions), }; +static struct lpi_pinctrl_variant_data sc7280_lpi_data = { + .pins = lpass_lpi_pins, + .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(lpass_lpi_pins), + .groups = sc7280_groups, + .ngroups = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_groups), + .functions = lpass_functions, + .nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(lpass_functions), +}; + static int lpi_gpio_read(struct lpi_pinctrl *state, unsigned int pin, unsigned int addr) { @@ -678,6 +714,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id lpi_pinctrl_of_match[] = { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl", .data = &sm8250_lpi_data, }, + { + .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl", + .data = &sc7280_lpi_data, + }, { } }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, lpi_pinctrl_of_match); -- Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SC7280 lpass pin configuration 2021-10-07 13:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SC7280 lpass pin configuration Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu @ 2021-10-07 17:54 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-10-27 7:48 ` Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Stephen Boyd @ 2021-10-07 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu, agross, alsa-devel, bgoswami, bjorn.andersson, broonie, devicetree, judyhsiao, lgirdwood, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel, perex, plai, robh+dt, rohitkr, srinivas.kandagatla, tiwai Cc: Venkata Prasad Potturu Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-10-07 06:48:39) > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c > index c0117c5..0b68065 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c > @@ -237,6 +264,15 @@ static struct lpi_pinctrl_variant_data sm8250_lpi_data = { > .nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(lpass_functions), > }; > > +static struct lpi_pinctrl_variant_data sc7280_lpi_data = { Can this variant data be const? > + .pins = lpass_lpi_pins, > + .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(lpass_lpi_pins), > + .groups = sc7280_groups, > + .ngroups = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_groups), > + .functions = lpass_functions, > + .nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(lpass_functions), > +}; > + > static int lpi_gpio_read(struct lpi_pinctrl *state, unsigned int pin, > unsigned int addr) > { ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SC7280 lpass pin configuration 2021-10-07 17:54 ` Stephen Boyd @ 2021-10-27 7:48 ` Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu @ 2021-10-27 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Boyd, agross, alsa-devel, bgoswami, bjorn.andersson, broonie, devicetree, judyhsiao, lgirdwood, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel, perex, plai, robh+dt, rohitkr, srinivas.kandagatla, tiwai Cc: Venkata Prasad Potturu On 10/7/2021 11:24 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-10-07 06:48:39) >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c >> index c0117c5..0b68065 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c >> @@ -237,6 +264,15 @@ static struct lpi_pinctrl_variant_data sm8250_lpi_data = { >> .nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(lpass_functions), >> }; >> >> +static struct lpi_pinctrl_variant_data sc7280_lpi_data = { > Can this variant data be const? Okay. Will change accordingly. >> + .pins = lpass_lpi_pins, >> + .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(lpass_lpi_pins), >> + .groups = sc7280_groups, >> + .ngroups = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_groups), >> + .functions = lpass_functions, >> + .nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(lpass_functions), >> +}; >> + >> static int lpi_gpio_read(struct lpi_pinctrl *state, unsigned int pin, >> unsigned int addr) >> { -- Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-28 22:22 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-10-07 13:48 [PATCH 0/3] Add pin control support for lpass sc7280 Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-07 13:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: qcom: Update lpass variant independent functions as generic Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-07 17:57 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-10-27 7:42 ` Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-07 13:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add sc7280 lpass lpi pinctrl compatible Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-07 17:59 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-10-27 7:47 ` Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-28 22:22 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-10-08 2:46 ` Rob Herring 2021-10-07 13:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SC7280 lpass pin configuration Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu 2021-10-07 17:54 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-10-27 7:48 ` Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).