Re: [PATCH] IMA: Add log statements for failure conditions

* Re: [PATCH] IMA: Add log statements for failure conditions
       [not found] ` <1591382782.5816.36.camel@linux.ibm.com>
@ 2020-06-05 19:37   ` Paul Moore
  2020-06-05 19:54     ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2020-06-05 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mimi Zohar
  Cc: tusharsu, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian, linux-integrity, linux-audit,
	linux-kernel

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 2:46 PM Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> [Cc'ing Paul Moore]

If it's audit related, it's generally best to CC the linux-audit list,
not just me (fixed).

It's not clear to me what this pr_err() is trying to indicate other
than *something* failed.  Can someone provide some more background on
this message?

> Hi Lakshmi,
>
> On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 09:32 -0700, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > The final log statement in process_buffer_measurement() for failure
> > condition is at debug level. This does not log the message unless
> > the system log level is raised which would significantly increase
> > the messages in the system log. Change this log message to error level,
> > and add eventname and ima_hooks enum to the message for better triaging
> > failures in the function.
> >
> > ima_alloc_key_entry() does not log a message for failure condition.
> > Add an error message for failure condition in this function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
>
> These messages should probably be turned into audit messages.  Look at
> integerity_audit_msg().
>
> Mimi
>
> > ---
> >  security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c       | 3 ++-
> >  security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c | 2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> > index 9d0abedeae77..3b371f31597b 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> > @@ -756,7 +756,8 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size,
> >
> >  out:
> >       if (ret < 0)
> > -             pr_devel("%s: failed, result: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> > +             pr_err("%s failed. eventname: %s, func: %d, result: %d\n",
> > +                    __func__, eventname, func, ret);
> >
> >       return;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c
> > index cb3e3f501593..e51d0eb08d8a 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c
> > @@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ static struct ima_key_entry *ima_alloc_key_entry(struct key *keyring,
> >
> >  out:
> >       if (rc) {
> > +             pr_err("%s failed. keyring: %s, result: %d\n",
> > +                    __func__, keyring->description, rc);
> >               ima_free_key_entry(entry);
> >               entry = NULL;
> >       }
>

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread