linux-audit.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: casey.schaufler@intel.com, linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 03/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:01:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhS+3K-AAzo2Z9iYTCx6wax0h2_grXayULDWsCFKezf8Jg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200222000407.110158-4-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 7:04 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
>
> Change the secid parameter of security_audit_rule_match
> to a lsmblob structure pointer. Pass the entry from the
> lsmblob structure for the approprite slot to the LSM hook.
>
> Change the users of security_audit_rule_match to use the
> lsmblob instead of a u32. In some cases this requires a
> temporary conversion using lsmblob_init() that will go
> away when other interfaces get converted.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
> Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/security.h            |  7 ++++---
>  kernel/auditfilter.c                |  6 ++++--
>  kernel/auditsc.c                    | 14 ++++++++++----
>  security/integrity/ima/ima.h        |  4 ++--
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c |  7 +++++--
>  security/security.c                 |  8 +++++---
>  6 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

...

> diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> index 3a44abf4fced..509eb21eff7f 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> @@ -1327,6 +1327,7 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
>                         struct audit_field *f = &e->rule.fields[i];
>                         pid_t pid;
>                         u32 sid;
> +                       struct lsmblob blob;
>
>                         switch (f->type) {
>                         case AUDIT_PID:
> @@ -1357,8 +1358,9 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
>                         case AUDIT_SUBJ_CLR:
>                                 if (f->lsm_isset) {
>                                         security_task_getsecid(current, &sid);
> -                                       result = security_audit_rule_match(sid,
> -                                                  f->type, f->op,
> +                                       lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
> +                                       result = security_audit_rule_match(
> +                                                  &blob, f->type, f->op,
>                                                    f->lsm_rules);

Unless I'm mistaken this patch is almost exclusively the following pattern:

  lsmblob_init(blob, sid);
  security_audit_rule_match(blob, ...);

... which means we are assigning every array member in @blob the same
value of "sid" and then sending that into the LSM where each LSM is
going to then have to index into that array, to all get the same
value, and then do their match.  I'm assuming this will make more
sense as I progress through the rest of the patchset, but right now it
seems like we could get by just fine with a u32 here.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com


--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-06 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200222000407.110158-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2020-02-22  0:03 ` [PATCH v15 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:03   ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:03   ` [PATCH v15 01/23] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:03     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:03   ` [PATCH v15 02/23] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:03     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-06 20:55     ` Paul Moore
2020-02-22  0:03   ` [PATCH v15 03/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:03     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-06 22:01     ` Paul Moore [this message]
2020-03-09 23:58       ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-10  0:55         ` Paul Moore
2020-02-22  0:03   ` [PATCH v15 07/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:03     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-07  1:17     ` Paul Moore
2020-02-22  0:03   ` [PATCH v15 08/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:03     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-07  1:21     ` Paul Moore
2020-02-22  0:04   ` [PATCH v15 09/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:04     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:04   ` [PATCH v15 10/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:04     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:04   ` [PATCH v15 11/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:04     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-07  1:36     ` Paul Moore
2020-02-22  0:04   ` [PATCH v15 12/23] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:04     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:04   ` [PATCH v15 14/23] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:04     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:04   ` [PATCH v15 15/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:04     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-07  2:01     ` Paul Moore
2020-02-22  0:04   ` [PATCH v15 20/23] Audit: Add subj_LSM fields when necessary Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:04     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-07  2:18     ` Paul Moore
2020-03-07  2:24     ` Paul Moore
2020-03-10  1:25       ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-10 21:46         ` Paul Moore
2020-02-22  0:04   ` [PATCH v15 21/23] Audit: Include object data for all security modules Casey Schaufler
2020-02-22  0:04     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-07  2:31     ` Paul Moore
2020-03-09 17:45       ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-09 17:59         ` Paul Moore
2020-03-09 23:01           ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-10 21:42             ` Paul Moore
2020-02-27 17:29   ` [PATCH v15 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2020-03-03 17:22     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-03 17:54       ` Paul Moore
2020-03-03 17:58         ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-06 17:14       ` Steve Grubb
2020-03-09 17:15         ` Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHC9VhS+3K-AAzo2Z9iYTCx6wax0h2_grXayULDWsCFKezf8Jg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).