Re: [PATCH] audit: add task history record

[Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>]

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 12:29 PM Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 9:53:58 AM EDT Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 6:10 AM Tetsuo Handa
> > <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> > > On 2023/08/16 3:44, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 6:58 AM Tetsuo Handa
> > > > <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> > > >> When an unexpected system event occurs, the administrator may want to
> > > >> identify which application triggered the event. For example,
> > > >> unexpected process termination is still a real concern enough to write
> > > >> articles like https://access.redhat.com/solutions/165993 .
> > > >>
> > > >> This patch adds a record which emits TOMOYO-like task history
> > > >> information into the audit logs for better understanding of unexpected
> > > >> system events.
> > > >>
> > > >> type=UNKNOWN[1340] msg=audit(1691750738.271:108):
> > > >> history="name=swapper/0;pid=1;start=20230811194329=>name=init;pid=1;s
> > > >> tart=20230811194343=>name=systemd;pid=1;start=20230811194439=>name=ssh
> > > >> d;pid=3660;start=20230811104504=>name=sshd;pid=3767;start=202308111045
> > > >> 35"
> > > >
> > > > While I respect your persistence, we've talked about this quite a bit
> > > > already in other threads.  What you are trying to do is already
> > > > possible with audit
> > >
> > > How?
> >
> > If you configure audit to record exec() and friends you should have a
> > proper history of the processes started on the system.
>
> This is not a practical solution. Yes, technically this could be done. But it
> would be a huge burden on the system to keep up with this. And it would bury
> events you truly wanted to see effectively DoS'ing the audit system.

If the audit subsystem can't handle the load, that is a separate issue.

-- 
paul-moore.com

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit