From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: bfoster@redhat.com, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcachefs: fix incorrect usage of REQ_OP_FLUSH
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:37:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6wpysqepf5nfpvugxutqqohkunjvewomk7lkvk2kd2cwkstg2@g7r3qz46txx7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240111073655.2095423-1-hch@lst.de>
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 08:36:55AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> REQ_OP_FLUSH is only for internal use in the blk-mq and request based
> drivers. File systems and other block layer consumers must use
> REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_PREFLUSH as documented in
> Documentation/block/writeback_cache_control.rst.
>
> While REQ_OP_FLUSH appears to work for blk-mq drivers it does not
> get the proper flush state machine handling, and completely fails
> for any bio based drivers, including all the stacking drivers. The
> block layer will also get a check in 6.8 to reject this use case
> entirely.
>
> [Note: completely untested, but as this never got fixed since the
> original bug report in November:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218184
>
> and the the discussion in December:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231221053016.72cqcfg46vxwohcj@moria.home.lan/T/
>
> this seems to be best way to force it]
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Hey Christoph, thanks - applied.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-11 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-11 7:36 [PATCH] bcachefs: fix incorrect usage of REQ_OP_FLUSH Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-11 16:37 ` Kent Overstreet [this message]
2024-01-19 21:32 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-01-22 6:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-22 6:37 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-01-22 6:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-22 17:37 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-01-22 17:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-22 17:42 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-01-22 18:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-23 0:42 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6wpysqepf5nfpvugxutqqohkunjvewomk7lkvk2kd2cwkstg2@g7r3qz46txx7 \
--to=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).