linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, clm@fb.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] iomap: support RWF_UNCACHED for buffered writes
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:49:33 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191218004933.GR19213@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a30113f7-2d5a-3adf-19c4-fe49e8ef1ae8@kernel.dk>

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 07:31:51AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/15/19 9:17 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 05:57:57PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 12/12/19 5:54 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> On 12/12/19 3:34 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>>> Just a thought on further optimisation for this for XFS.
> >>>> IOMAP_UNCACHED is being passed into the filesystem ->iomap_begin
> >>>> methods by iomap_apply().  Hence the filesystems know that it is
> >>>> an uncached IO that is being done, and we can tailor allocation
> >>>> strategies to suit the fact that the data is going to be written
> >>>> immediately.
> >>>>
> >>>> In this case, XFS needs to treat it the same way it treats direct
> >>>> IO. That is, we do immediate unwritten extent allocation rather than
> >>>> delayed allocation. This will reduce the allocation overhead and
> >>>> will optimise for immediate IO locality rather than optimise for
> >>>> delayed allocation.
> >>>>
> >>>> This should just be a relatively simple change to
> >>>> xfs_file_iomap_begin() along the lines of:
> >>>>
> >>>> -	if ((flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_ZERO)) && !(flags & IOMAP_DIRECT) &&
> >>>> -			!IS_DAX(inode) && !xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip)) {
> >>>> +	if ((flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_ZERO)) &&
> >>>> +	    !(flags & (IOMAP_DIRECT | IOMAP_UNCACHED)) &&
> >>>> +	    !IS_DAX(inode) && !xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip)) {
> >>>> 		/* Reserve delalloc blocks for regular writeback. */
> >>>> 		return xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay(inode, offset, length, flags,
> >>>> 				iomap);
> >>>> 	}
> >>>>
> >>>> so that it avoids delayed allocation for uncached IO...
> >>>
> >>> That's very handy! Thanks, I'll add that to the next version. Just out
> >>> of curiosity, would you prefer this as a separate patch, or just bundle
> >>> it with the iomap buffered RWF_UNCACHED patch? I'm assuming the latter,
> >>> and I'll just mention it in the changelog.
> >>
> >> OK, since it's in XFS, it'd be a separate patch.
> > 
> > *nod*
> > 
> >> The code you quote seems
> >> to be something out-of-tree?
> > 
> > Ah, I quoted the code in the 5.4 release branch, not the 5.5-rc1
> > tree. I'd forgotten that the xfs_file_iomap_begin() got massively
> > refactored in the 5.5 merge and I hadn't updated my cscope trees. SO
> > I'm guessing you want to go looking for the
> > xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin() and add another case to this
> > initial branch:
> > 
> >         /* we can't use delayed allocations when using extent size hints */
> >         if (xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip))
> >                 return xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(inode, offset, count,
> >                                 flags, iomap, srcmap);
> > 
> > To make the buffered write IO go down the direct IO allocation path...
> 
> Makes it even simpler! Something like this:
> 
> 
> commit 1783722cd4b7088a3c004462c7ae610b8e42b720
> Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Date:   Tue Dec 17 07:30:04 2019 -0700
> 
>     xfs: don't do delayed allocations for uncached buffered writes
>     
>     This data is going to be written immediately, so don't bother trying
>     to do delayed allocation for it.
>     
>     Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index 28e2d1f37267..d0cd4a05d59f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -847,8 +847,11 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
>  	int			allocfork = XFS_DATA_FORK;
>  	int			error = 0;
>  
> -	/* we can't use delayed allocations when using extent size hints */
> -	if (xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip))
> +	/*
> +	 * Don't do delayed allocations when using extent size hints, or
> +	 * if we were asked to do uncached buffered writes.
> +	 */
> +	if (xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip) || (flags & IOMAP_UNCACHED))
>  		return xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(inode, offset, count,
>  				flags, iomap, srcmap);
>  

Yup, that's pretty much what I was thinking. :)

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-18  0:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-11 15:29 [PATCHSET v3 0/5] Support for RWF_UNCACHED Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: add read support " Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: make generic_perform_write() take a struct kiocb Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: make buffered writes work with RWF_UNCACHED Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] iomap: pass in the write_begin/write_end flags to iomap_actor Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 17:19   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] iomap: support RWF_UNCACHED for buffered writes Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 17:19   ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-11 18:05     ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 22:34   ` Dave Chinner
2019-12-13  0:54     ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-13  0:57       ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-16  4:17         ` Dave Chinner
2019-12-17 14:31           ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-18  0:49             ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2019-12-18  1:01               ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 17:37 ` [PATCHSET v3 0/5] Support for RWF_UNCACHED Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 17:56   ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 19:14     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 19:34     ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 20:03       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 20:08         ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 20:18           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 21:04             ` Johannes Weiner
2019-12-12  1:30               ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 23:41             ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12  1:08               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12  1:11                 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12  1:22                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12  1:29                     ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12  1:41                       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12  1:56                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-12  2:47                           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12 17:52                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-12 18:29                               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12 20:05                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-12  1:41                       ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12  1:49                         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12  1:09               ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12  2:03                 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12  2:10                   ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12  2:21                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-12  2:38                     ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 22:18                 ` Dave Chinner
2019-12-13  1:32                   ` Chris Mason
2020-01-07 17:42                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-08 14:09                       ` Chris Mason
2020-02-01 10:33                     ` Andres Freund
2019-12-11 20:43           ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-11 20:04       ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 10:44 ` Martin Steigerwald
2019-12-12 15:16   ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 21:45     ` Martin Steigerwald
2019-12-12 22:15       ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 22:18     ` Linus Torvalds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-12-12 19:01 [PATCHSET v4 " Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 19:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] iomap: support RWF_UNCACHED for buffered writes Jens Axboe
2019-12-13  2:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-12-13  2:38     ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-10 20:42 [PATCHSET v2 0/5] Support for RWF_UNCACHED Jens Axboe
2019-12-10 20:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] iomap: support RWF_UNCACHED for buffered writes Jens Axboe
2019-12-11  1:14   ` Dave Chinner
2019-12-11 14:44     ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-10 16:24 [PATCHSET 0/5] Support for RWF_UNCACHED Jens Axboe
2019-12-10 16:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] iomap: support RWF_UNCACHED for buffered writes Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191218004933.GR19213@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).