linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] block: fix get_max_segment_size() overflow on 32bit arch
@ 2020-01-08  1:25 Ming Lei
  2020-01-08  2:06 ` Damien Le Moal
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2020-01-08  1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: linux-block, Ming Lei, Guenter Roeck

Commit 429120f3df2d starts to take account of segment's start dma address
when computing max segment size, and data type of 'unsigned long'
is used to do that. However, the segment mask may be 0xffffffff, so
the figured out segment size may be overflowed because DMA address can
be 64bit on 32bit arch.

Fixes the issue by using 'unsigned long long' to compute max segment
size.

Fixes: 429120f3df2d ("block: fix splitting segments on boundary masks")
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-merge.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index 347782a24a35..b0fcc72594cb 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -159,12 +159,12 @@ static inline unsigned get_max_io_size(struct request_queue *q,
 
 static inline unsigned get_max_segment_size(const struct request_queue *q,
 					    struct page *start_page,
-					    unsigned long offset)
+					    unsigned long long offset)
 {
 	unsigned long mask = queue_segment_boundary(q);
 
 	offset = mask & (page_to_phys(start_page) + offset);
-	return min_t(unsigned long, mask - offset + 1,
+	return min_t(unsigned long long, mask - offset + 1,
 		     queue_max_segment_size(q));
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] block: fix get_max_segment_size() overflow on 32bit arch
  2020-01-08  1:25 [PATCH] block: fix get_max_segment_size() overflow on 32bit arch Ming Lei
@ 2020-01-08  2:06 ` Damien Le Moal
  2020-01-08  2:34   ` Jens Axboe
  2020-01-08  2:38   ` Ming Lei
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2020-01-08  2:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ming Lei, Jens Axboe; +Cc: linux-block, Guenter Roeck

On 2020/01/08 10:25, Ming Lei wrote:
> Commit 429120f3df2d starts to take account of segment's start dma address
> when computing max segment size, and data type of 'unsigned long'
> is used to do that. However, the segment mask may be 0xffffffff, so
> the figured out segment size may be overflowed because DMA address can
> be 64bit on 32bit arch.
> 
> Fixes the issue by using 'unsigned long long' to compute max segment
> size.
> 
> Fixes: 429120f3df2d ("block: fix splitting segments on boundary masks")
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-merge.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index 347782a24a35..b0fcc72594cb 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -159,12 +159,12 @@ static inline unsigned get_max_io_size(struct request_queue *q,
>  
>  static inline unsigned get_max_segment_size(const struct request_queue *q,
>  					    struct page *start_page,
> -					    unsigned long offset)
> +					    unsigned long long offset)
>  {
>  	unsigned long mask = queue_segment_boundary(q);
>  
>  	offset = mask & (page_to_phys(start_page) + offset);

Shouldn't mask be an unsigned long long too for this to give the
expected correct result ?

> -	return min_t(unsigned long, mask - offset + 1,
> +	return min_t(unsigned long long, mask - offset + 1,
>  		     queue_max_segment_size(q));
>  }
>  
> 


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] block: fix get_max_segment_size() overflow on 32bit arch
  2020-01-08  2:06 ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2020-01-08  2:34   ` Jens Axboe
  2020-01-08  2:38     ` Damien Le Moal
  2020-01-08  2:38   ` Ming Lei
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-01-08  2:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Damien Le Moal, Ming Lei; +Cc: linux-block, Guenter Roeck

On 1/7/20 7:06 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2020/01/08 10:25, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Commit 429120f3df2d starts to take account of segment's start dma address
>> when computing max segment size, and data type of 'unsigned long'
>> is used to do that. However, the segment mask may be 0xffffffff, so
>> the figured out segment size may be overflowed because DMA address can
>> be 64bit on 32bit arch.
>>
>> Fixes the issue by using 'unsigned long long' to compute max segment
>> size.
>>
>> Fixes: 429120f3df2d ("block: fix splitting segments on boundary masks")
>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  block/blk-merge.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
>> index 347782a24a35..b0fcc72594cb 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
>> @@ -159,12 +159,12 @@ static inline unsigned get_max_io_size(struct request_queue *q,
>>  
>>  static inline unsigned get_max_segment_size(const struct request_queue *q,
>>  					    struct page *start_page,
>> -					    unsigned long offset)
>> +					    unsigned long long offset)
>>  {
>>  	unsigned long mask = queue_segment_boundary(q);
>>  
>>  	offset = mask & (page_to_phys(start_page) + offset);
> 
> Shouldn't mask be an unsigned long long too for this to give the
> expected correct result ?

Don't think so, and the seg boundary is a ulong to begin with as well.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] block: fix get_max_segment_size() overflow on 32bit arch
  2020-01-08  2:34   ` Jens Axboe
@ 2020-01-08  2:38     ` Damien Le Moal
  2020-01-08  2:47       ` Ming Lei
  2020-01-08  2:59       ` Guenter Roeck
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2020-01-08  2:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, Ming Lei; +Cc: linux-block, Guenter Roeck

On 2020/01/08 11:34, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/7/20 7:06 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 2020/01/08 10:25, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> Commit 429120f3df2d starts to take account of segment's start dma address
>>> when computing max segment size, and data type of 'unsigned long'
>>> is used to do that. However, the segment mask may be 0xffffffff, so
>>> the figured out segment size may be overflowed because DMA address can
>>> be 64bit on 32bit arch.
>>>
>>> Fixes the issue by using 'unsigned long long' to compute max segment
>>> size.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 429120f3df2d ("block: fix splitting segments on boundary masks")
>>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  block/blk-merge.c | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
>>> index 347782a24a35..b0fcc72594cb 100644
>>> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
>>> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
>>> @@ -159,12 +159,12 @@ static inline unsigned get_max_io_size(struct request_queue *q,
>>>  
>>>  static inline unsigned get_max_segment_size(const struct request_queue *q,
>>>  					    struct page *start_page,
>>> -					    unsigned long offset)
>>> +					    unsigned long long offset)
>>>  {
>>>  	unsigned long mask = queue_segment_boundary(q);
>>>  
>>>  	offset = mask & (page_to_phys(start_page) + offset);
>>
>> Shouldn't mask be an unsigned long long too for this to give the
>> expected correct result ?
> 
> Don't think so, and the seg boundary is a ulong to begin with as well.
> 

I was referring to 32bits arch were ulong is 32bits. So we would have

offset = 32bits & 64bits;

with the patch applied. But I am not sure how gcc handles that and if
this can be a problem.

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] block: fix get_max_segment_size() overflow on 32bit arch
  2020-01-08  2:06 ` Damien Le Moal
  2020-01-08  2:34   ` Jens Axboe
@ 2020-01-08  2:38   ` Ming Lei
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2020-01-08  2:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Damien Le Moal; +Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block, Guenter Roeck

On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 02:06:25AM +0000, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2020/01/08 10:25, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Commit 429120f3df2d starts to take account of segment's start dma address
> > when computing max segment size, and data type of 'unsigned long'
> > is used to do that. However, the segment mask may be 0xffffffff, so
> > the figured out segment size may be overflowed because DMA address can
> > be 64bit on 32bit arch.
> > 
> > Fixes the issue by using 'unsigned long long' to compute max segment
> > size.
> > 
> > Fixes: 429120f3df2d ("block: fix splitting segments on boundary masks")
> > Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  block/blk-merge.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> > index 347782a24a35..b0fcc72594cb 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> > @@ -159,12 +159,12 @@ static inline unsigned get_max_io_size(struct request_queue *q,
> >  
> >  static inline unsigned get_max_segment_size(const struct request_queue *q,
> >  					    struct page *start_page,
> > -					    unsigned long offset)
> > +					    unsigned long long offset)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned long mask = queue_segment_boundary(q);
> >  
> >  	offset = mask & (page_to_phys(start_page) + offset);
> 
> Shouldn't mask be an unsigned long long too for this to give the
> expected correct result ?

queue_segment_boundary() always returns 'unsigned long', so far not
see issue related with that.


Thanks,
Ming


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] block: fix get_max_segment_size() overflow on 32bit arch
  2020-01-08  2:38     ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2020-01-08  2:47       ` Ming Lei
  2020-01-08  2:59       ` Guenter Roeck
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2020-01-08  2:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Damien Le Moal; +Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block, Guenter Roeck

On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 02:38:02AM +0000, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2020/01/08 11:34, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 1/7/20 7:06 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> >> On 2020/01/08 10:25, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>> Commit 429120f3df2d starts to take account of segment's start dma address
> >>> when computing max segment size, and data type of 'unsigned long'
> >>> is used to do that. However, the segment mask may be 0xffffffff, so
> >>> the figured out segment size may be overflowed because DMA address can
> >>> be 64bit on 32bit arch.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes the issue by using 'unsigned long long' to compute max segment
> >>> size.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 429120f3df2d ("block: fix splitting segments on boundary masks")
> >>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >>> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  block/blk-merge.c | 4 ++--
> >>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> >>> index 347782a24a35..b0fcc72594cb 100644
> >>> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> >>> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> >>> @@ -159,12 +159,12 @@ static inline unsigned get_max_io_size(struct request_queue *q,
> >>>  
> >>>  static inline unsigned get_max_segment_size(const struct request_queue *q,
> >>>  					    struct page *start_page,
> >>> -					    unsigned long offset)
> >>> +					    unsigned long long offset)
> >>>  {
> >>>  	unsigned long mask = queue_segment_boundary(q);
> >>>  
> >>>  	offset = mask & (page_to_phys(start_page) + offset);
> >>
> >> Shouldn't mask be an unsigned long long too for this to give the
> >> expected correct result ?
> > 
> > Don't think so, and the seg boundary is a ulong to begin with as well.
> > 
> 
> I was referring to 32bits arch were ulong is 32bits. So we would have
> 
> offset = 32bits & 64bits;
> 
> with the patch applied. But I am not sure how gcc handles that and if
> this can be a problem.

Both are 'unsigned', so C compiler will do zero extension for 32bits.


Thanks,
Ming


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] block: fix get_max_segment_size() overflow on 32bit arch
  2020-01-08  2:38     ` Damien Le Moal
  2020-01-08  2:47       ` Ming Lei
@ 2020-01-08  2:59       ` Guenter Roeck
  2020-01-08  3:02         ` Damien Le Moal
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2020-01-08  2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Damien Le Moal, Jens Axboe, Ming Lei; +Cc: linux-block

On 1/7/20 6:38 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2020/01/08 11:34, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 1/7/20 7:06 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> On 2020/01/08 10:25, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>> Commit 429120f3df2d starts to take account of segment's start dma address
>>>> when computing max segment size, and data type of 'unsigned long'
>>>> is used to do that. However, the segment mask may be 0xffffffff, so
>>>> the figured out segment size may be overflowed because DMA address can
>>>> be 64bit on 32bit arch.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes the issue by using 'unsigned long long' to compute max segment
>>>> size.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 429120f3df2d ("block: fix splitting segments on boundary masks")
>>>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>>> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   block/blk-merge.c | 4 ++--
>>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
>>>> index 347782a24a35..b0fcc72594cb 100644
>>>> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
>>>> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
>>>> @@ -159,12 +159,12 @@ static inline unsigned get_max_io_size(struct request_queue *q,
>>>>   
>>>>   static inline unsigned get_max_segment_size(const struct request_queue *q,
>>>>   					    struct page *start_page,
>>>> -					    unsigned long offset)
>>>> +					    unsigned long long offset)
>>>>   {
>>>>   	unsigned long mask = queue_segment_boundary(q);
>>>>   
>>>>   	offset = mask & (page_to_phys(start_page) + offset);
>>>
>>> Shouldn't mask be an unsigned long long too for this to give the
>>> expected correct result ?
>>
>> Don't think so, and the seg boundary is a ulong to begin with as well.
>>
> 
> I was referring to 32bits arch were ulong is 32bits. So we would have
> 
> offset = 32bits & 64bits;
> 
> with the patch applied. But I am not sure how gcc handles that and if
> this can be a problem.
> 

Type extension is well defined in the C standard.

The underlying problem here is that mask is 0xffffffff, and
page_to_phys(start_page) as well as offset are sometimes 0.
In this situation, mask - offset + 1 is 0 if offset is a 32 bit
variable, and 0x100000000 if offset is a 64 bit variable.
In the first case, this results in a wrong maximum segment
size of 0.

Guenter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] block: fix get_max_segment_size() overflow on 32bit arch
  2020-01-08  2:59       ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2020-01-08  3:02         ` Damien Le Moal
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2020-01-08  3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guenter Roeck, Jens Axboe, Ming Lei; +Cc: linux-block

On 2020/01/08 11:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 1/7/20 6:38 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 2020/01/08 11:34, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 1/7/20 7:06 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>>> On 2020/01/08 10:25, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>>> Commit 429120f3df2d starts to take account of segment's start dma address
>>>>> when computing max segment size, and data type of 'unsigned long'
>>>>> is used to do that. However, the segment mask may be 0xffffffff, so
>>>>> the figured out segment size may be overflowed because DMA address can
>>>>> be 64bit on 32bit arch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes the issue by using 'unsigned long long' to compute max segment
>>>>> size.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 429120f3df2d ("block: fix splitting segments on boundary masks")
>>>>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>>>> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   block/blk-merge.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
>>>>> index 347782a24a35..b0fcc72594cb 100644
>>>>> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
>>>>> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
>>>>> @@ -159,12 +159,12 @@ static inline unsigned get_max_io_size(struct request_queue *q,
>>>>>   
>>>>>   static inline unsigned get_max_segment_size(const struct request_queue *q,
>>>>>   					    struct page *start_page,
>>>>> -					    unsigned long offset)
>>>>> +					    unsigned long long offset)
>>>>>   {
>>>>>   	unsigned long mask = queue_segment_boundary(q);
>>>>>   
>>>>>   	offset = mask & (page_to_phys(start_page) + offset);
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't mask be an unsigned long long too for this to give the
>>>> expected correct result ?
>>>
>>> Don't think so, and the seg boundary is a ulong to begin with as well.
>>>
>>
>> I was referring to 32bits arch were ulong is 32bits. So we would have
>>
>> offset = 32bits & 64bits;
>>
>> with the patch applied. But I am not sure how gcc handles that and if
>> this can be a problem.
>>
> 
> Type extension is well defined in the C standard.
> 
> The underlying problem here is that mask is 0xffffffff, and
> page_to_phys(start_page) as well as offset are sometimes 0.
> In this situation, mask - offset + 1 is 0 if offset is a 32 bit
> variable, and 0x100000000 if offset is a 64 bit variable.
> In the first case, this results in a wrong maximum segment
> size of 0.

OK. Thanks for the clarification.

> 
> Guenter
> 


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-08  3:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-08  1:25 [PATCH] block: fix get_max_segment_size() overflow on 32bit arch Ming Lei
2020-01-08  2:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-01-08  2:34   ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-08  2:38     ` Damien Le Moal
2020-01-08  2:47       ` Ming Lei
2020-01-08  2:59       ` Guenter Roeck
2020-01-08  3:02         ` Damien Le Moal
2020-01-08  2:38   ` Ming Lei

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).