linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: blk-mq: improvement CPU hotplug (simplified version) v3
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 12:09:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200525040952.GB791214@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26169cd9-49b8-b949-aaa3-9745e821c86c@acm.org>

On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 08:19:58AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2020-05-21 19:39, Ming Lei wrote:
> > You may argue that two hw queue may share single managed interrupt, that
> > is possible if driver plays the trick. But if driver plays the trick in
> > this way, it is driver's responsibility to guarantee that the managed
> > irq won't be shutdown if either of the two hctxs are active, such as,
> > making sure that hctx->cpumask + hctx->cpumask <= this managed interrupt's affinity.
> > It is definitely one strange enough case, and this patch doesn't
> > suppose to cover this strange case. But, this patch won't break this
> > case. Also just be curious, do you have such in-tree case? and are you
> > sure the driver uses managed interrupt?
> 
> I'm concerned about the block drivers that use RDMA (NVMeOF, SRP, iSER,
> ...). The functions that accept an interrupt vector argument
> (comp_vector), namely ib_alloc_cq() and ib_create_cq(), can be used in

PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY isn't used in RDMA driver, so RDMA NIC uses non-managed
irq.

> such a way that completion interrupts are handled on another CPU than
> those in hctx->cpumask.

As I explained, this patchset doesn't rely on that interrupts have to
be fired on hctx->cpumask, and it only changes the submission io path,
which is blk-mq's generic code path which doesn't depend on any driver's
specific behavior.

Please let us know if your concerns are addressed.



Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-25  4:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-20 17:06 blk-mq: improvement CPU hotplug (simplified version) v3 Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20 17:06 ` [PATCH 1/6] blk-mq: remove the bio argument to ->prepare_request Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20 18:16   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-22  9:11   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-05-20 17:06 ` [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: simplify the blk_mq_get_request calling convention Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20 18:22   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-22  9:13   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-05-20 17:06 ` [PATCH 3/6] blk-mq: move more request initialization to blk_mq_rq_ctx_init Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20 20:10   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-20 17:06 ` [PATCH 4/6] blk-mq: open code __blk_mq_alloc_request in blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-22  9:17   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-05-20 17:06 ` [PATCH 5/6] blk-mq: add blk_mq_all_tag_iter Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20 20:24   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-27  6:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-22  9:18   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-05-20 17:06 ` [PATCH 6/6] blk-mq: drain I/O when all CPUs in a hctx are offline Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-22  9:25   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-05-25  9:20     ` Ming Lei
2020-05-20 21:46 ` blk-mq: improvement CPU hotplug (simplified version) v3 Bart Van Assche
2020-05-21  2:57   ` Ming Lei
2020-05-21  3:50     ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-21  4:33       ` Ming Lei
2020-05-21 19:15         ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-22  2:39           ` Ming Lei
2020-05-22 14:47             ` Keith Busch
2020-05-23  3:05               ` Ming Lei
2020-05-23 15:19             ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-25  4:09               ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-05-25 15:32                 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-25 16:38                   ` Keith Busch
2020-05-26  0:37                   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200525040952.GB791214@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).