From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] nvme: consolidate nvme requirements based on transport type
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:09:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200914220951.GD148663@relinquished.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c502865-5ac1-9952-1b79-fef0f61749c6@deltatee.com>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 04:04:59PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-09-14 3:51 p.m., Omar Sandoval wrote:
> >> diff --git a/tests/nvme/002 b/tests/nvme/002
> >> index 07b7fdae2d39..aaa5ec4d729a 100755
> >> --- a/tests/nvme/002
> >> +++ b/tests/nvme/002
> >> @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@
> >> DESCRIPTION="create many subsystems and test discovery"
> >>
> >> requires() {
> >> - _have_program nvme && _have_modules loop nvme-loop nvmet && _have_configfs
> >> + _nvme_requires
> >> + _have_modules loop
> >
> > Bash functions return the status of the last executed command, and the
> > requires function needs to return 0 on success and 1 on failure. So,
> > this is losing the return value of _nvme_requires. Just chain multiple
> > checks with && to fix this (here and the other places _nvme_requires was
> > added with other checks):
> >
> > requires() {
> > _nvme_requires && _have_modules loop
> > }
>
> I noticed this too during my review, but based on my read of the current
> blktest code, the return value of the requires() function is not
> actually used. It seems to only check if SKIP_REASON is set.
>
> If we want to ensure the return value of requires() is correct, perhaps
> we should check it after we call it and then consult SKIP_REASON? And
> WARN or fail if SKIP_REASON is set when requires() didn't return 1.
>
> Also, we need to do more than adding &&s... _nvme_requires() will need
> to be fixed up as it calls other _have_x() functions and ignores their
> return value.
>
> Logan
Oops, you're right, I actually changed this a few months ago in
4824ac3f5c4a ("Skip tests based on SKIP_REASON, not return value").
Totally forgot about that :) IMO it's still cleaner to chain them
together.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-14 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-03 23:53 [PATCH v7 0/7] blktests: Add support to run nvme tests with tcp/rdma transports Sagi Grimberg
2020-09-03 23:53 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] nvme: consolidate nvme requirements based on transport type Sagi Grimberg
2020-09-04 0:18 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-09-14 21:51 ` Omar Sandoval
2020-09-14 22:04 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-14 22:09 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2020-09-14 22:23 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-14 22:25 ` Omar Sandoval
2020-09-03 23:53 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] nvme: consolidate some nvme-cli utility functions Sagi Grimberg
2020-09-04 0:19 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-09-03 23:53 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] nvme: make tests transport type agnostic Sagi Grimberg
2020-09-04 0:20 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-09-03 23:53 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] tests/nvme: restrict tests to specific transports Sagi Grimberg
2020-09-04 0:21 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-09-14 21:53 ` Omar Sandoval
2020-09-03 23:53 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] nvme: support nvme-tcp when runinng tests Sagi Grimberg
2020-09-04 0:21 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-09-03 23:53 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] common: move module_unload to common Sagi Grimberg
2020-09-04 0:22 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-09-03 23:53 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] nvme: support rdma transport type Sagi Grimberg
2020-09-04 0:23 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-09-04 17:00 ` Yi Zhang
2020-09-04 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] blktests: Add support to run nvme tests with tcp/rdma transports Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-11 22:06 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-09-25 17:32 ` Omar Sandoval
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200914220951.GD148663@relinquished.localdomain \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).