From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/4] blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before freeing one request pool
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 10:06:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJSgqS4YtQkNSiKr@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <423139b7-cb64-64dd-08f0-86f5b2681e70@acm.org>
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 06:11:59PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 5/5/21 7:58 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> > index 4a40d409f5dd..8b239dcce85f 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> > @@ -203,9 +203,14 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_find_and_get_req(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
> > unsigned int bitnr)
> > {
> > struct request *rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > - if (!rq || !refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref))
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&tags->lock, flags);
> > + if (!rq || !refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref)) {
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tags->lock, flags);
> > return NULL;
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tags->lock, flags);
> > return rq;
> > }
>
> Shouldn't the 'rq = tags->rqs[bitnr]' assignment be protected by tags->lock
> too? Otherwise a request pointer could be read before the request pointer
> clearing happens and the refcount_inc_not_zero() call could happen after the
> request clearing.
Right, will fix it.
--
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-07 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-05 14:58 [PATCH V5 0/4] blk-mq: fix request UAF related with iterating over tagset requests Ming Lei
2021-05-05 14:58 ` [PATCH V5 1/4] block: avoid double io accounting for flush request Ming Lei
2021-05-06 6:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-05 14:58 ` [PATCH V5 2/4] blk-mq: grab rq->refcount before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter Ming Lei
2021-05-06 6:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-06 7:30 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-05 14:58 ` [PATCH V5 3/4] blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before freeing one request pool Ming Lei
2021-05-06 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-06 7:34 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-06 12:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-06 13:38 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-07 6:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-07 7:30 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-06 14:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-07 0:11 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-07 1:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-07 2:05 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-07 3:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-07 6:31 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-07 6:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-08 2:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-06 15:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-07 0:13 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-07 1:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-07 2:06 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-05-05 14:58 ` [PATCH V5 4/4] blk-mq: clearing flush request reference in tags->rqs[] Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YJSgqS4YtQkNSiKr@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).